Free Affirmative Action Essays - I'm White, Angry, and Against Affirmative Action
- Length: 1265 words (3.6 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
I'm White, Angry, and Against Affirmative Action
Papers are piling up on top of a desk. People are running around
trying to meet their deadlines. Assignments are being pushed back to later
dates. Phones are being answered, but put on hold for the next available
representatives. The president of the firm puts out a notice of hire. The
word is spread throughout the business community through the newspaper and
the internet. Resumes are received every business day. The board members
of the firm review hundreds of resumes that are received daily. They rate
the applications according to qualifications and experiences. The names
are disregarded at this point. A dozen of the applicants are chosen, and
notified to setup initial interviews. One applicant meets all the
qualifications, and has had numerous experiences in the field. This
applicant clearly surpasses all the other applicants. The commitee is very
impressed by this young man. He heads home in delight, hoping to hear from
the marketing firm again. Unfortunately, he never hears from
them again. The main reason why he was not chosen, was because of the
color of his skin. Since he is Asian, they could not hire him, because 50%
of their employees are Asian. Under the affirmative action, they must
employ someone who is underrepresented. This type of situation happens
often. It is not the qualifications, but the color of the skin that
employers look for today. Affirmative action is a step backwards. We are
back to color and race differences. We are all Americans and should be
treated as so, not what ethnicity we are. Affirmative action should be
abolished solely because we do not want to make the same mistake our
society made in the past --- discriminate according to color. Two wrongs
do not make a right.
Many people say that we should keep affirmative action to render
fairness to the minorities because of the wrongs that was once put on to
them. This simply does not make sense. To compensate someone, a person
must have gone through an experience. People today did not go through such
discrimination, as their past ancestors. How can we punish someone for
what they had no control? Our white society today did not commit the
wrongs that were committed a generation ago. We should not punish them,
but rather treat everyone fairly. We should treat everyone as Americans.
As Bakke quotes the Constitution,
"...The guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment extend to all persons.
It's language is explicit: "No State shall... deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." It is settled beyond
question that the rights created by the first section of the Fourteenth
Amendment are, by its terms, guaranteed to the individual." (Bakke, p.485)
In the past, we were fighting to abolish racial separation, but today, we
have affirmative action, which still brings about the separation of the
different races. We should fight for equality for all. Affirmative action
affects everyone, including our children.
Under the affirmative action law, our schools are currently
recruiting students according to race and color. According to a critic on
"A college board survey, described in Andrew Hacker's Two Nations, in 1992
the average combined SAT score for black students whose parents earn more
than $70,000 a year was 854, which was twenty-five points lower than the
average SAT for white students whose parents earn less than $20,000 a
year." (Rosen, p.3)
In effect, the solution by supporters of affirmative action is to
lower the school's standards so that they can accept a more diverse group
of students. This solution is ridiculous, simply because everyone has a
chance to do good. It is just a matter of effort. If a student is spoiled,
and does not realize how important an education is, he will not study as
hard as someone who has been brought up with education as their number one
goal. Family incomes have less to do with SAT scores than the efforts
students put into their studies. We should not lower our standards.
Instead, all students should raise their own standards in order to improve
our society. For example, the University of California in Berkeley has a
diverse student body with a majority of Asians. An Asian student coming
out of high school with a 4.0 GPA, and a list of extra curricular
activities would not be accepted simply because of his ethnicity. Instead
the school would rather accept a Mexican student with a 3.0 GPA. Why
should the student who did not study as hard be rewarded just because of
his race? Nobody has the choice of ethnicity when they are born, so we
should not deprive anyone when they make the effort. Affirmative action
also brings about different standards in grading.
The National Merit Scholarship has one standard for African
Americans, and one for the rest of the applicants. This type of double
standards is absurd, because black students are not graded any differently
in the classroom. This also implies that black students are not capable of
handling the same material as the rest of the Americans are. This double
standard, in itself, is an insult to the black community. There are many
black people who want to be treated equally, without any special assistance.
By giving minorities special treatment, we are simultaneously insulting
them by implying they are of a lower class. As Judge O'Connor of Richmond
"Classifications based on race carry a danger of stigmatic harm. Unless
they are strictly reserved for remedial settings, they may in fact promote
notions of racial inferiority and lead to a politics of racial hostility.
We thus reaffirm the view expressed by the plurality in Wygant that the
standard of review under the Equal Protection Clause is not dependent on
the race of those burdened or benefited by a particular classification."
We do not want to cause any more hostility than there already is in our
society by imposing special standards. Our goal is to promote unity in our
society, not separation. This also affects the efficiency in our workforce.
In the work place, people hired under special assistance may slow
the process. If someone was hired over another simply because of the color
of his skin, and not by his qualifications, the business loses as well.
They must pay someone the same salary they would have paid a more efficient
employee. Lowering standards in the workplace, to accommodate a race, is a
step back to poorly made products. In the 1980's, American cars were
marked with a distinction of poor quality. Since then, our cars have
vastly improved, but the distinction is still planted in many people's
minds. If we lower our standards in the white collar force, we may develop
the same distinction in our corporate businesses as we have in our cars.
Another point is that many people say that affirmative action will bring
diversity to our workforce. A projection done by the San Jose Tribune
suggests that by the year 2000, white males will make up only 10% of new
hires. This does not promote diversity, rather reverse discrimination.
To have a unified and peaceful society, we must move away from the
separation of color lines. We moved forward when we abolished segregation,
but we are now moving back by imposing Affirmative action. This is not the
way to solve anything. Affirmative action will just cause more hostility
between races, which in turn, can lead to hatred.