Eine sache die mir am meisten Gefalt, dass er macht, oder solte ich sagen das er nicht macht, ist arbeiten. Ich weiss dass man arbeiten solte, aber wenn mann es nich tun muss, muss dass toll sein. Eine sache die damit kompt, ist dass man sich kaum um Geld kummern muss. Das ist weil mann auch nicht sehr viel zu kaufen hat. Er kricht freies Essen, und lebt eimphach Drousen. Ich finde wenn er soetwas tun kann, und kein problem damit hat, ist dass auch ok. Noch eine sache die damit kompt, ist dass er nich Matierialistishen sachen brauch. Ich glaube das heutzutage viel, zu viele Leute sich dadrum kummern. Er hat auch sehr viel Freiheit, und Freie Zeit. Aber, die eine sache vo ich am meisten neidish bin, ist dass er mit seinem Leben ganzs zufrieden war. Dass ist sehr swehr zu tun.
Ich konnte vieleicht so leben. Nich fur immer, aber bestimpt so lang dass ich etwas uber meine eigene personlichkeit lehrne konnte. Es wurde auch fantastisch sein, nicht Arbeiten zu mussen. Auch Wenn man so was tut, lehrnt man sehr viel. Wenn mann wieder zuruck zu dass ‘normale’ leben geht, wurde mann, sehr viel mehr, zufrieden sein.
Da sind aber sehr viele sachen die mir nicht gefalen wurden. Erstens hatte ich nurgendwo zu schlafen. Ich hatte auch nich mein eigenes Badezimmer. Dass wurde meinen dass ich mich nich jeden Tag mich washen konnte. Ich weiss auch nicht ob ich dass vertragen konnte, dass andere Leute mich hassen und denken dass ich uberhaubt nichts bin. Noch eine wichtige sache ist dass ich nicht gehrne bettlen wurde. Ich konte nich in der Stasse sitzen und dauernt fur Geld fraggen von fremden. Mir gefalt auch meinchmal ein richtig gutes essen.
Deutsche Brauerei has been a family owned and operated corporation for 12 generations, which has created a high level of focus and control. Each generation has kept the management and operations processes relatively simple, centered on brewing practices and quality. Deutsche Brauerei’s rapid growth in recent years can be attributed to several factors. First and foremost, the company’s success is centered on the product itself, which has won numerous quality awards and is quite popular in Germany. Another contributing factor to the recent growth may have been a bit inadvertent. The purchase of new equipment in 1994, which was necessary as a result of a fire that destroyed the old equipment, allowed the company to increase brewing capacity and efficiency. Finally, Deutsche Brauerei’s decision to enter the Ukranian market in 1998 contributed significantly to the rapid growth. The collapse of the U.S.S.R. brought market reforms, and Deutsche Brauerei jumped on the opportunity to enter the fragmented beer industry, capture the large population and capitalize on the prime location in Europe. Lukas Schweitzer was savvy enough to hire local expert Oleg Pinchuk away from a competitor as the marketing manager, and Oleg was instrumental in building the business in Ukraine by securing accounts and implementing the field warehousing to support distributors. Deutsche’s beer was hugely popular in the Ukraine almost immediately, and volume sales more than offset the depreciation of the Ukrainian currency. Sales in Ukraine accounted for 28% of Deutsche’s total sales, and skyrocketed from 4,262 euros in 1998 to 25,847 euros in 2001.
Conflicting thoughts are often profound in Hamlet, like how he is faced with a choice of now or never but always has approached them carefully. One was when Hamlet speaks while walking into an empty room and begins to question why we do what we do. ``To be or not to be-that is the question `` 127, a famous quote from Hamlet. Provoking the thought of reason in his actions. To act now or later would be his though...
Or, finally, third "average" approach of the special influence on free activity of the person, with the purpose of understanding him of Truth of the Boon. If, certainly, both Truth and Boon still appreciated by the man of Freedom. Presently the classical statement of a problem has got other form. How will the concept of the Boon and Paideia be transformed, if the relations between Freedom and Truth will considerably change to opposite? In such form the problem is put in the title of the article. Actually before the terms "Freedom" and "Truth" a word "essence" is omitted. Classics talk about "essence of Freedom" and "the essence of Truth". One should remember and mentally "thought" about it. The complete name should sound like: "Ambiguity of Schelling understanding of "essence of Freedom as of a Truth - God" in comparison with ambiguity of Heidegger understanding of "essence of Truth of Being as Freedom" in struggle of philosophical ideas on a problem of con-crete (total specific) "self-development – self-creativity – self-creation" of Paideia. "in a whole" "now-and-here" "in this person" today". The understanding of relations between Freedom and Truth by Schelling appears to be the representation of understanding of relations between Freedom and Truth by Heidegger.
To initiate, this passage comes from the British writer C.S Lewis and his prose piece ‘Perelandra’. It was published in 1944 and thus probably written during the last couple of years of the Second World War (which ended in 1945). This piece is a descriptive narration which lacks any type of direct dialogue between the characters, as we mainly have only one, and has an interesting play on the verb tenses.
Connecting Sociology to situations that arise in everyday life has become easier and easier as i have progressed through Intro to Sociology this semester. When choosing what book I was going to analyze for my report, I chose Methland by Nick Reding. It details the quote “death and life of an american small town” through the perspective of those involved in the epidemic of the production of methamphetamine’s in the rural town of Oelwein Iowa. Despite the odds of a poor, small, and rural town in Middle America, Oelwein climbed to the top of the economic ladder with a multi million dollar drug franchise spread throughout the 1990’s. The midwest suffered greatly in the 1980’s with the downfall of the agricultural business in the United States. Soon drug dealers started flocking to these seemingly desolate towns in rural America to safely distribute their product. With the loss of jobs due to the farming downfall, many residents of Oelwein were seeking work and pay in anyway they could find. This is what started the official meth epidemic. Reding spent 4 years in his hometown of Oelwein Iowa to gain insight on the production and consumption of methamphetamine’s in this small town and also shines a spotlight on the problems of meth in this country today. But ironically, the comparison in this story of how the production and consumption of meth seemed to be driving this small town further into extinction, it also brought it back to life. Despite the destruction methamphetamines caused in Oelwein Iowa, the epidemic also brought the town back to life in a way that is irreversible. The highlight of the division of social class and who is able to climb up the social ladder is themed throughout the entire novel.
“To be or not to be that is the question.” (III. i L 56). This soliloquy is one of the most recited piece by those who are familiar with the line. Although, not many may know the true meaning behind the line. It is significant to analyze how the use of soliloquies can enhance the message in Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet and in other literary elements. Hamlet’s soliloquy reveals that he is contemplating suicide due to complications he experienced in the play. However, soliloquies are often confused with the function of an aside, which is a comment a character directs to only the audience can hear inner thoughts by the speaker. By understanding these dramatic devices that appear in the play, it will reveal the dynamics of Hamlet’s
In the unit “The Spirit of Individualism” there are two parts, “Celebrations of the self” and “The Dark side of Individualism” with pieces that present very different perspectives on human nature. “The Dark side of Individualism” portrays human nature as greedy, confused, easily caught up in fame, and addicted to wealth and possessions. In “Celebrations of the Self”, human nature is viewed in a more positive light. The characteristics shown are self reliance, independence, wisdom and selflessness. “The Dark side of Individualism” pieces are written in a more macabre tone, whereas “Celebrations of the Self” pieces have a more positive and uplifting tone to them. The generalizations of human nature are different because of the pieces in “The Dark side of Individualism” and “Celebrations of the Self” have entirely different views on life and human nature.
William Shakespeare’s Hamlet is laden with tragedy from the start, and this adversity is reflected in the title character. Being informed of his father’s murder and the appalling circumstances surrounding the crime, Hamlet is given the emotionally taxing task of avenging his death. It is clear that having to complete this grim undertaking takes its toll on Hamlet emotionally. Beginning as a seemingly contemplative and sensitive character, we observe Hamlet grow increasingly depressed and deranged as the play wears on. Hamlet is so determined to make his father proud that he allows the job on hand to completely consume him. We realize that Hamlet has a tendency to mull and ponder excessively, which causes the notorious delays of action throughout the play. It is often during these periods of deep thought and reflection that we hear one of Hamlet’s famous soliloquies, which are obviously relative to Hamlet’s apprehensions and worries surrounding his current situation. The seven soliloquies throughout the play offer insight pertaining to the deteriorating mental state of Hamlet, and the circumstances which induce his decent into madness.
On the journey through the path of life, there are encounters with many different incidents and situations where we must act accordingly. Depending on what type of personality is possessed, there are numerous ways that we can deal with these encounters. In the play Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, the main character is confronted with a cluster of dilemmas and is in emotional distress. The ghost that encounters Hamlet, the monarchs’ incest, and the contemplation of murder, are the major conflicts which he must deal with one way or another. As a result of these three issues, as well as Hamlet’s particular character, he handles these issues internally which causes internal struggle and a passive response.
Prior, to this passage Hamlet had just been introduced with Claudius and Gertrude reminding him about his principal duty to the state. This is Hamlet’s first soliloquy out of six, it acts as an indicator of his character, and establishes the inner turmoil which develops as the play progresses. The soliloquy can be divided into three major thematic parts: suicide/death, betrayal/corruption, and duty.
Rahman, Rubina, and Sameera Abbas. "Antic Disposition: Hamlet in the Light of Cooperative Principle." The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 21.1 (2013): 51-60. ProQuest. Web. 24 Apr. 2014.
Hamlet gives us seven soliloquies, all centered on the most important existential themes: the emptiness of existence, suicide, death, suffering, action, a fear of death which puts off the most momentous decisions, the fear of the beyond, the degradation of the flesh, the triumph of vice over virtue, the pride and hypocrisy of human beings, and the difficulty of acting under the weight of a thought 'which makes cowards of us all'. He offers us also, in the last act, some remarks made in conversation with Horatio in the cemetery which it is suitable to place in the same context as the soliloquies because the themes of life and death in general and his attitude when confronted by his own death have been with him constantly. Four of his seven soliloquies deserve our special attention: 'O that this too sullied flesh would melt', 'O what a rogue and peasant slave am I!', 'To be, or not to be, that is the question', and 'How all occasions do inform against me'.
Her husband must take on the role of mediator to weigh her selfish desires against laws and morals that condemn stealing. This role represents the ego, which regulates the selfish id and the strict moral superego to reach a decision (Guerin 130). He decides that his wife's urgent need for the rampion outweighs the moral ...
The story begins with Montresor’s monologue, explaining why he wants to take revenge on Fortunado, actually a friend of him. “The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge”. Although the writer doesn’t give the detail explanation of what, on earth, Fortunato did by the “thousand injuries”, we can still feel the anger of Montresor, burning in his mind. He wants to revenge, using his own way. “It must be understood that neither by word nor deed had I given Fortunato cause to doubt my good will. I continued as was my wont, to smile in his face, and he did not perceive that my smile NOW was at the thought of his immolation.” He knew Fortunato’s characteristics well, including the weak point. That is how he did the whole revenge.