Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
racism in america against African-Americans
racism in america against African-Americans
racism in america against African-Americans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: racism in america against African-Americans
Cross Burnings
Imagine feeling extremely relaxed and comfortable. You have just tucked your children in for bed, and you are about to retire for the evening yourself. As soon as you drift off into a peaceful sleep, “BOOM!” Your children are crying, and your entire family is startled. You go into the living room to find out a brick has been thrown through your window. Attached to the brick, is a note reading “NIGGER!” Outside of your window, you see a group of cowards hiding behind white sheets standing in your yard next to a burning cross. I encourage everyone to help prevent such hideous hate crimes.
Hate crimes such as cross burnings are resurfacing. In 1998, a Black family in Virginia Beach was the victim of this senseless act. Two white men were convicted of an attempted cross burning. The men took a cross to a black neighbor’s yard with the intention of setting it on fire. Can you imagine the anxiety and the terror brought to this innocent family?
On November 2, 2001, the Virginia Supreme court lifted the state’s forty-nine year old ban on cross burning. The court ruled that cross burning is a form of symbolic expression protected by the First Amendment. It was a four to three decision that the 1952 statue unfairly discriminated against a particular symbol and viewpoint. According to Justice Donald W. Lemons, “Under our system of government, people have the right to use symbols to communicate. They may patriotically wave the flag or burn it in protest; they may worship the cross or burn it as an expression of bigotry.” Leroy R. Hassell, Sr., the only black justice, and two of his colleagues opposed this view, arguing that the law did not infringe upon protected speech. Hassell commented, the First Amendment does not permit a person to burn a cross in a manner that intentionally places another person in fear of bodily harm.” The Virginia Supreme Courts decision overturned the convictions of the two men who were charged in two incidents of cross burnings.
Hating another person just because of their race is not just affecting the adults, but it has a huge impact on our children. An anonymous teen responded to the Public Broadcast Stations hate crime topic via the talkback forum on their website. On November 26, 2001, the teen wrote, “why do people think it is right to kill other people because of their race?
Hate crimes have been a problem even in the past. Maybe worst than it is today. Some examples are the Ku Klux Klan and Holocaust. The Ku Klux Klan was a organization of whites who primarily targeted african americans according to the Tanenbaum organization. Although they had a primary target, they also killed homosexuals, people who helped african americans, and recently catholics. This is a major example of hate groups extremist committing hate crimes. They target a group of people who are different, and treat them as if they were not equal. Hate crimes can vary from leaving a hateful message to kidnapping and murder. The holocaust in Europe is also considered as a hate crime. They targeted the jews due to their hatred of them. According to the human rights campaign, since 1968, federal laws made did not cover much areas of hate crimes. Things like voting improved from a result of these laws, but gay and lesbian hate crimes have not been helped. Another incident of hate crime rising in the U.S. is 9/11. During the bombing of the Twin Towers, it caused the Americans to unite, but the downfall of the incident caused a brewing of hatred for muslims. “The Americans had hatred growing on muslims even if they were believed not to be the attackers”(hrc.org). Hate crimes have been bad since the past 100 years.
The fact that hate crimes still occur in America is another signpost that tolerance is still an unheard of notion to a lot of people. In 2007 the Federal Bureau of Investigation released statistics showing that 2,105 law enforcement agencies reported 9,080 offences of hate crime. This includes vandalism, intimidation, simple and aggravated assault, and murder. This also includes not only race statistics, but religious, sexual orientation, ethnicity, and disability motivated crimes. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission released statistics of discrimination charges for the same year with all ...
Over the years our county has had an ongoing history of racism, bigotry, hatred, and violence, but no one can forget that fateful day on April 20, 1999 when our country was yet again in despair and angered to find out the violen...
Laws continue to become protective of victims whether it is for hate crime or not. As time passes, more research will be conducted and laws will be created and modified. An example is, if a boss decides he no longer need your services, so he lets you go, which is no crime at all. But, if he decides to do so because he does not believe your race should being working for the company, it then becomes a hate crime when they verbalize that reason. That boss can be charged with a violation title IV of a Civil Rights
When the topic of hate and bias crime legislation is brought up two justifications commonly come to mind. In her article entitled “Why Liberals Should Hate ‘Hate Crime Legislation” author Heidi M. Hurd discusses the courts and states views that those who commit hate and bias crimes ought to be more severely punished. She takes into consideration both sides of the argument to determine the validity of each but ultimately ends the article in hopes to have persuaded the reader into understanding and agreeing with her view that laws concerning the punishment of hate and bias laws should not be codified. Hate crime is described as a violent, prejudice crime that occurs when a victim is targeted because of their membership in a specific group. The types of crime can vary from physical assault, vandalism, harassment or hate speech. Throughout the article Hurd tried to defend her view and explain why there should be no difference of punishment for similar crimes no matter the reason behind it. Her reason behind her article came from the law that President Obama signed in 2009 declaring that crimes committed with hatred or prejudice should have more sever punishments. While the court has their own views to justify their reasoning behind such decisions, in the article Hurd brings up points and facts to prove the wrongfulness of creating such a law. However, though Hurd has made her views clear in the following essay I will discuss reasons why the penalties are justifiable, why they should receive the same degree of punishment, less punishment and my personal view on the topic.
Lieberman M, Larner J. “Hate crime laws: punishment to fit the crime. Dissent”. 2010;(3):81. Available from: Academic OneFile, Ipswich, MA. Accessed April 1, 2014.
Every generation faces new challenges and new problems to which we have progressed, conquered or simply just swept right under the rug. In today’s world we are increasingly facing numerous social problems, such as income disparity, unemployment, political instability amongst many others, but racism seems to have resurfaced in these past years. Although, the United States has come a long way in the issue of racism, it has never completely conquered it. Incidents such the shooting at Ferguson Missouri has raised an upheaval of protesters against the Country’s system that claims equal treatment and equal opportunity for all, regardless of race or gender. Incidents such as the one previously mentioned, clearly depicts that white-power continues
In this world today, hate is becoming increasingly more abundant, especially as it concerns race. Whether it be an unarmed black man shot by a white police officer or the use of racial slurs towards someone, it seems like racism is all around us. In the book To Kill A Mockingbird, it shows a little girl named Scout using racial slurs. Racism is so culturally accepted in the town that it’s okay to use racial slurs such as the N-Word that even Atticus, a lawyer representing a black man falsely accused of rape, uses it a couple of times. Earlier this year, the Ku Klux Klan, a group of white supremacists, held a violent rally in Charlottesville, Virginia and proved that racism isn’t a thing of the past. In order to combat racism, groups of like-minded individuals with a common goal of making the world a more accepting place must come together to stand up
“It isn't against the law to burn a cross or any other religious symbol—yet it would be against the law to burn a flag, if these flag amendment folks have their way” (Levendosky). If you are allowed to buy a cross and go home and burn it why should you be held to a law that is the same as that. Making a flag more than what it should be is what is making the argument such a big deal. “Chief Justice William Rehnquist, in a dissent fifteen years ago, when the Court refused to hold flag burning a crime, wrote that "the true nature of the state's interest in this case is not only one of preserving 'the physical integrity of the flag' but also one of preserving the flag as an important symbol of nationhood and unity. . . . It is the character not the cloth of the flag that the states seek to protect" (Garbus). This quote represents taking this case too far. This case should be held between a couple of people in the government, but they should have a vote that declares what's what. And if people don’t like what happens then you can keep it to
Think about your largest insecurity and how you feel when others bring it to light. For some this is a daily occurrence as they are ridiculed for their race. In the article, “On Racist Speech,” author Charles R. Lawrence III discusses factors pertaining to racism and how it influences our daily lives negatively. Lawrence grew up through the stages of segregation and was able to watch our nation grow to what it is now. The topic that is brought to question is, do we really live in a truly integrated and equal country? Segregation is not only an issue of the past, but continues to be a problem in modern day. To diffuse our nation of hate speech, we must stand together and face the issues that we have created.
Mr. Johnson was arrested for violating Texas law in desecrating a venerated object. The case went to court in the state of Texas and Johnson was convicted. “The only criminal offense with which he was charged was the desecration of a venerated object in violation of Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 42.09(a) (3) (1989). [n1] After a trial, he was convicted, sentenced to one year in prison, and fined $2,000”. Johnson then appealed to the Supreme Court arguing that his actions were protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution as free speech. The Supreme Court agreed to hear this case and did so March 21,
King, Ryan D., Steven. F Messner, Robert D. Baller. 2009. “Contemporary Hate Crimes, Law Enforcement and the Legacy of Racial Violence.” American Sociological Association. 74: 291-315.
Hate crime is still being committed today and many believe that it would benefit victims and communities if hate crimes were punished more severely. However, hate crimes should not be punished more severely than other crimes that are motivated for other reasons; although the motivation (personal belief) and violence that constitute a hate crime are horrendous, criminals should be prosecuted for their wrongdoing, not for their beliefs. The idea that criminals should be punished more severely than crimes that are motivated by greed, anger, revenge is not acceptable. The potential motivations that were just given can constitute several crimes, like, murder. The issue (which, in my opinion, makes a good argument) is that it ‘’creates complicated moral problems by making it appear as if a murder is "worse" when committed because of the victim's race, religion, or sexual orientation.’’ (Hate crime laws, 2014) Murder is one the worst crimes that can be committed and it can have several motives and reasons behind it. Allowing hate crimes to be punished more severely or stating that hate crime is more ‘’aggressive’’ and ‘’brutal’’ is not fair to other victims and treats them
Someone commits a hate crime every hour. In the most recent data collection, 2014, a reported 17, 876 hate crimes were committed. This is a national crisis that we cannot allow to continue.
In America, hate crimes are a rising problem. Statistics show that a hate crime is committed every hour. A cross is burned every week. Eight blacks, three whites, three gays, three Jews, and one Latino become victims every day. Today, America prides itself on being a tolerant country. Through legislation including affirmative action and movements against racism, we see ourselves as a country offering equal opportunities to all. This statement, however, is slightly biased. Contrary to popular belief, everything is not wonderful in the land of the free and home of the brave. Many live in fear of being persecuted because of who they are naturally. The United States needs to find a way to combat these crimes, mainly through introducing tougher laws regarding hate crimes.