Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
effect of Technology in people',s
effect of Technology in people',s
the effect of technology on human personality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: effect of Technology in people',s
It has become aparent to me in the past few months that most people are not really thinkers. Most who read this essay will be lost, and will not comprehend many of the theories I adress. I cannot begin to understand why, but most people are not even the least bit curious about what in our lives is real.
From where I stand right now, I know or believe to know certain things. I believe that this pencil is real. I believe this note book is real. I believe the people in this park are real. But, how can I know this? The first question to answer might be, what does it mean to know? This is a valid question, but I don't intend to answer it. For now I will assume that whatever it is that I can recall from my mind's memory, I know. For instance, I know this pecil is composed of matter. I know this paper is composed of matter. So, now the question again arises. . .
Is this pencil and paper real? The immediate answer which I do not wish to contest with is, yes. But why? Well, first its made of matter. As I look arround the park I see people, statues, architecture, earth, sky, and manny other things. Is it matter that makes something real. I think not necesarrily, but all things composed of matter are real. This is because I can react with them. Things that I can't react, or act upon cannot be real right?
So now I've established a small chunk of what is real in my life. Now what about the people? What is it about people or any living composition of matter that makes them move? I understand, that muscles move bodies, nervous systems move muscles, minds moves nervous systems, but what moves minds?
I was stumped for a very long time, where I had become very unproductive, sitting looking at the park, wondering what moves the mind. Shortly after I thought the park would provide no answer for me, a couple came walking in throught the south archway. I thought to my self, "its kinda cool to see two strangers (to me, not eachother) in love, talking, sharing moments, comunicating. Then I some lyrics popped into my head, "reestablish comunication.
Our minds are powerful, how we think makes us who we are, the more our minds open and
By deeming that nothing is certain and recognizing that our senses are false, this is a step to prove that “I” exist. Following the logic of sense deception and the idea that nothing is certain, there has to be a material thing that doubts and is deceived. According to Descartes in the Second Meditation, that material thing is “I,” thus “I am, I exist.” Since the material thing (body) is known, what is the material conceptually made of? I believe that the doubting thing, “I,” has knowledge that depends on things that are certain, but it can also sense (simulate images of things). Supporting my argument that humans need reason to prove their existence, I quote Descartes when he says “I would seem to be speaking no less foolishly were I to say: I will use my imagination in order to recognize more distinctly who I am.” In this quotation, Descartes reiterates my previous point that sensing is unreliable and that reason is the only way to knowing our existence. Since we need reason to determine our existence, it means that human is a “thinking thing” because it “doubts, understands, affirm, denies, wills, refuses and imagines.” The “Wax argument” is a good example of why reason is essential. The Wax argument is a theory that discusses the different conditions of wax. Wax has a distinct form when it is solid but melt when close to fire. Without reason how will I know
‘the act of knowing using mental processes such as imagining, remembering, understanding, generalising, finding reasons and causes, making inferences, decision making, forming preferences, desires and intentions, planning and learning’ (Doherty & Hughes, 2009:257)
What we see is not the truth, but rather our interpretation and distortion of the things we struggle to perceive. Our imagination, ideologies and perceptions fuse with our conception of reality, as we transform the world around us, give meanings to abstractions, and find order in a world programmed by madness. We are prone to madness, to nature, to the metaphorical forces that influence and envelop reality. In order to understand the metaphysical realm, we conceptualize these divine, omnipotent forces through our uses of symbols, thus creating an understandable world defined by rationality and philosophy thinking. Philosophical thinking and rationality enable us to both understand our world metaphorical and define what humanity is. These ideas
Without perception, in our illusions and hallucinations, we lose “our sense of beings,” (Capra). Lost in “isolation,” (Capra) perhaps lost within our own illusion, our abstractions, we lose the ability to judge, to dichotomize, reality from illusions, right from wrong.
Knowledge is of two different kinds: what we know or where we can go find the information upon it. The face of knowing something is sometimes gained through experience. With knowledge or the thought that you know something there are many possible and equally definitions of knowledge. People saying that they know something is a justification that they believe it, but facts could be proven and shown that what they believe is not true. It shouldn’t have to be a good reason for anyone to say they know such things and believe in it. If you know something, you know something. No feedback to test my knowledge. We all don’t think or act the same so the knowledge is different upon each human.
Paul, R. 1990, ‘Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World’, Centre for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique. Retrieved 18 May 2010 from
Life is coming toward us at such a rate that every second displays a new scene of potentially new challenges. Therefore, we must expand our thinking abilities in order to survive. Technology is also growing rapidly, thus we are continually influenced and pushed to find new alternative options. Thinking is a process of response, and if it is productive, it results in changing our world views and knowledge. It is an independent action that happens continually whether we choose it or not. Buddha argued that, “We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts, we make the world.” As a result, we affect the world with the way we think about it. Our brains are regularly dealing with thoughts which are reflected in our facial expression, speech, and attitude. There are two ways in which we think, convergent and divergent, which were introduced first by Joy Paul Guilford in 1967. When multiple options are offered, the best one is chosen and that is convergent thinking. However, divergent thinking offers just one option with a variety of outcomes. While convergent thinking is essential in academic achievement, divergent thinking is essential to succeed in today’s world.
When one really thinks about it, the only thing we can be sure of is the existence of our minds. Whatever one believes is all perceived through senses, emotions, and thoughts such as sight or past experiences/knowledge. In actuality, anything we perceive cannot be believed as fact. On one end of the spectrum, extremists known as solipsists would argue that nothing exists but their minds, they make up the entirety of their reality and nobody else even exists. The floor beneath our feet does not exist and neither do our peers. If you try to argue that this life you lead is real because you can see the world, or through science, or that it is a dream that even if so, would still be perceived as a reality. Your senses have to be filtered through your mind, but to do that your mind has to tell you about the external world- which is what is being called into question- so trying to prove that your senses are reliable will leave to arguing in circles. Science again has this same issue- if one cannot establish the reliability of the senses in relation to an external w...
For the philosopher, the acknowledgment of the existence and the importance of the human imagination is a necessary trait. Without an active and informed imagination, one cannot make judgment calls or investigate the world with the skill and ease of the great philosophers. If one does not have an imagination, one cannot fathom Plato’s analogy of the cave, one cannot imagine the gray shadows flickering against the cold and jagged wall. Without an imagination, one cannot picture the ideal city, or Santa Clause, or divide the imagination into two parts. In the same way, the imagination is an intricate and useful part of human nature. The mind, a multi-faceted folder of sense, dreams, and imagination opens the door for philosophy to lead the way in pursuit of the good, the true, and the beautiful.
Just as it is human nature to feel desire, it is also human nature to long for an understanding of Earth’s unanswerable questions. Prior to scientific discoveries, humans developed their own means of understanding- religion. Although religion originally served as a means to explain natural phenomenona as well as spiritual ones, as science began to answer those kinds of questions, religion evolved to explain what science could not. Questions about the meaning of life and the mortality of man were answered in various formats. Unfortunately, as it is human nature to desire knowledge, it is also human nature to physically see manifestations of this knowledge. By creating immutable answers to mutable questions, mankind accidentally created a paradox. In order to achieve the answers that men desired, they must have faith in them. Since faith and doubt go hand in hand, it is impossible to have one without the other. For some, doubt wins over and they refuse to be associated with anything spiritual. Yet others are willing to take a leap of faith and believe in the unknown, their rational minds clinging to the idea that this knowledge will perhaps grant them immortality. After all, it is only human nature to desire survival. Nevertheless, doubt often worms itself into their minds, often in times of intense emotional time periods, often brought on by the grief over losing a loved one. Since art is often a reflection of the human mind, many works of art mirror the artist’s most intense emotional experiences. An example of such a work is Sir Alfred Tennyson’s series of poems, entitled In Memoriam A.H.H. These poems follow Tennyson throughout a three year mourning period after the sudden death of his close friend, Arthur Henry H...
In my Theory of Knowledge class, I learned that belief and truth can be very contrasting ideas. In my opinion, I can believe something that may not necessarily be true. However, there can also be truth that is impossible for me to believe. Belief is a mental state in which someone is confident in the existence of something, but may not necessarily have objective proof to support their claim. Truth is objective and public; it is eternal and unchanging without biast. People can believe in something different and can also all believe in the same idea. The overlap between truth and belief creates knowledge; therefore, an acquisition of knowledge will bring us further to what we believe to be a ‘truth’. Knowledge can be acquired in several ways, such as using emotion, reason and sense perception. These ways of knowing affect how we perceive reality, and help us create our beliefs.
What is ideal and what is real? We seem to have this idealized concept of what love is supposed to be like according to the way society has molded us. Perhaps these ideals are more about the self than they are about a relationship between two people. We want to feel loved, and when we get that love from another person we become determined to secure that feeling. By securing these feelings we lean towards controlling that relationship. However, control is merely a way of fabricating and disguising reality. And by manipulating reality in this way we create an ideal relationship stemming mainly from our own selfish vain imaginings.
Jerome S. B. , Goodnow J. J. and Austin G.A. (1967) Overview ( p.231-247):In A study of thinking . John Wiley and Sons Ltd, USA
...be asked of this grand production: why are we acting? It might seem as though we are being foolishly ignorant and throwing away the opportunity to fully and passionately seek out truth and once and for all be rid of our superficial mindsets, but that will never be. In the first place, man will never be capable to see the world with open and unbiased eyes, and secondly it is probably best that he doesn’t. The world needs childlike trust and hopefulness, it needs the ability to believe in something greater than itself, it needs the opportunity to foolishly and whole-heartedly believe in something that brings joy into its heart. There are certain personal and world truths that individuals should strive to understand simply to have a greater knowledge of life, but realism can cast a cruel hand on imagination and freedom that no human being should be held captive to.