Julius Caesar's Soliloquy in Act Two

  • Length: 850 words (2.4 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document

Julius Caesar's Soliloquy in Act Two

In the play, Julius Caesar an important Soliloquy occurs in Act II,scene 1, lines 10-34. The passage is very important to the play because Brutus is deciding whether to join the conspiracy or not. Also an example of foreshadowing is used in the passage, because Brutus thinks, through the natural course of life, people with power become tyrants after a while. In the passage, conflict is also used because Brutus has to decide whether or not to betray Julius or join the conflict against Julius.
To support my thesis is Brutus is deciding if he should join the conspiracy against
Julius Caesar or not to join the conspiracy, this can be proved because Brutus says,
I know no reason to spurn him, But
for the general. He would be crowned.
How that might change his nature, there's the question.
( II, ii, 11-14)
Here Brutus is saying that he says no personal reason to kill him, but if Julius is crowned king, he would probably become a tyrant. In this passage, Brutus is making a decision based merely on an assumption. Another event within my passage to support my thesis is when Brutus says", By which he did ascend. So Caesar may; then lest he may, prevent".(II, iii, 27-28) Here I think Brutus is trying to say that Caesar will become power crazy and forget where he came from. In this part of Brutus' soliloquy, Brutus seems as though he probably will join the conspiracy at this point.
To support my thesis if Brutus is deciding to join the conspiracy against Caesar at
( I, ii, 135-162). If you are a conspirator it would be smart to bring Brutus in the conspiracy because no one would ever suspect Brutus would try to kill Caesar.
Here Brutus is explaining his inner feelings to Cassius. The sufferance of our souls, the time's
abuse. If these motives weak, break
off bedtimes. And every man hence
to his idle bed.
(II, i, 116-117)
This is a good chance for Cassius to get Brutus to join the conspiracy. Another important event is at ( I, ii, 18) where the soothsayer tells Ceasar to watch out for the eyes of March. This is a clue to an upcoming event in the story.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Julius Caesar's Soliloquy in Act Two." 123HelpMe.com. 26 May 2018
Title Length Color Rating  
The Character of Marc Antony in Julius Caesar Essay - Blending into the ground, waiting for the perfect moment to lash out, and then attacking when an opportunity presents itself, snakes hunt the same way some people do politics. In Rome, 44 BC, when one man fell prey, another man, camouflaged, found his opportunity to strike. As William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar progresses, the character of Marc Antony slowly reveals that he is not who he at first seems, a cunning manipulator rather than a blindly obedient lapdog. Antony, when he is introduced in Act 1 is running a traditional race on the Lupercal and is asked to touch Calpurnia by Caesar, who is referring to a superstition at the time that the touch of a runner in the race could cause...   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays]
:: 1 Works Cited
765 words
(2.2 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Importance of Fidelity in Julius Caesar Essay - Importance of Fidelity in Julius Caesar Humans have always been communal animals. They band together in groups, for social and survival needs. This sense of community brings about the values of dedication and loyalty. The alliances man has created inspires stories and plays about any number of time periods. Many examples of fidelity are illustrated in the characters of Julius Caesar. Antonius appears to be blindly loyal to Caesar. He comes off as a rash supporter in the scene that depicts Antonius viewing Caesar's body....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays] 578 words
(1.7 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Brutus Was Recognized as Hero in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar Essay examples - “A hero is an ordinary individual who finds the strength to preserver and endure in spite of overwhelming obstacles” (Christopher Reeve). Julius Caesar is a tragedy about a ruler that is murdered by a group of angry conspirators that go into a civil war against Caesar’s right hand man. By portraying the qualities of honorable Brutus, William Shakespeare, in his tragedy Julius Caesar, proves that anyone with good intentions, nobility, and the ability to recognize flaws can be a true hero. People constantly say that it is the thought that counts and that the intentions of the heart mean more than the actions....   [tags: Brutus, Heroes, Shakespeare, plays, Julius Caesar,] 1009 words
(2.9 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Marcus Brutus as a Tragic Hero in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar Essay - Marcus Brutus as a Tragic Hero in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar In the play Julius Caesar, the tragedy of the play was directed mainly at one specific character, Marcus Brutus. Brutus was the tragic hero of the play, because of his idealistic and pragmatic qualities. The mindset that Brutus possessed only allowed him to see the world and its people from one point of view. This point of view allowed him to make judgments that assumed only the best of people. This tragic weakness resulted in many errors throughout the play....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays] 1435 words
(4.1 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Marcus Brutus: The Tragic Hero Of Julius Ceasar Essay - “A man cannot become a hero until he can see the root of his own downfall.”(Aristotle). It should be noted that the Heroes downfall is his own fault as a result of his own free will, At times his death is seen as a waste of human potential. His death usually is not a pure loss, because it results in greater knowledge and awareness. In Julius Ceasar, William Shakespeare develops Marcus Brutus as the Tragic Hero whose ambition and naivety in his blind confidence in the nobility of man sparked guidance in a series of events which inevitably forced him to succumb to self destruction....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays]
:: 1 Works Cited
978 words
(2.8 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Shakespeare's Julius Caesar Essay - Shakespeare's Julius Caesar "A talent for drama is not a talent for writing, but is an ability to articulate human relationships"- Gore Vida. This is certainly true for William Shakespeare, on of the greatest writers of all time. He wrote such dramas like Romeo and Juliet, Macbeth, Hamlet and Othello. Julius Caesar is no different. His ability to relate to human nature by using drama accurately distinguishes Julius Caesar from the rest by creating suspense, eagerness and tension. Act III Scene II is an especially important part to the play....   [tags: Plays William Shakespeare Caesar Essays] 834 words
(2.4 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Julius Caesar Act III Journal Questions Essay - Julius Caesar Act III Journal Questions 1) Caesar makes some claims about himself in Act III. Based on internal evidence in the play, are these claims true. Do you think the qualities he claims to have would be good qualities in a ruler. Caesar refers to himself as “immovable as the North Star,” and given the turn of events that brought him to the Senate, this is likely very true. Caesar is indeed immovable, even the face of overwhelming opposition. Despite numerous warnings from his wife and soothsayers about his impended doom, he ignores the danger and goes to the Senate....   [tags: plebeians, shakespeare]
:: 1 Works Cited
932 words
(2.7 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay about The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare - In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus faces an internal conflict involving his best friend Caesar becoming the ruler of Rome. Brutus must decide whether to let Caesar live, knowing he would be a bad ruler for Rome, or whether he should kill him for the good of the people. Based on Brutus’ knowledge, his decision to kill Caesar was justified with reason, being innocently misled and manipulated, and the intention of doing what was best for the general good of Rome. Julius Caesar was murdered before being crowned the ruler of Rome due to fear that his personality and many of his characteristics would lead to his rule being one similar to a dictatorship....   [tags: brutus, tragic hero, play, rome]
:: 1 Works Cited
970 words
(2.8 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Julius Caesar - Mark Antony Essay - Mark Antony &#9;The character of Mark Antony from Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar may be viewed as simply the confident and devoted supporter of Julius Caesar. On the contrary, Antony presents the qualities of a shrewd flatterer, a ruthless tyrant, as well as a loyal follower. Antony’s characteristics will change as the play progresses. He will begin using flattery to get what he wants, but he will eventually depend on his powerful relentlessness. Furthermore, Antony uses these various attributes to make him successful....   [tags: essays research papers] 1003 words
(2.9 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Julius Caesar Essay - SUMMARY: Shakespeare's Julius Caesar is the story of the resulting conflicts from the assassination of perpetual dictator and Roman emperor, Julius Caesar. A great friend of Caesar, Mark Antony, comes to the senate to see the dead body of their dictator. He pretends to not be angry at those who took part in the assassination, and asks to speak at his funeral, a request which he is granted. However, after the men leave, he begins a soliloquy in which he suggests that Caesar's spirit will take revenge upon his murderers and invoke a war involving the entire country....   [tags: essays research papers] 558 words
(1.6 pages)
Good Essays [preview]

Caesar was warned many times during the play about the conspiracy. Ceasar was sent a letter warning him of the conspiracy. A portion of the letter as follows: To speak and strike? O Rome, I make thee
promise, If the redress will follow, thou receivest
Thy full petition at the hand of Brutus!
( II,i , 55-58)
Here Cassius has said that there is a plan to strike? I make the promise, if this happens, that the entire conspiracy rest in the hand of Brutus. I think that Lucius says in not too many words, that the entire conspiracy rests on Brutus. A few passages after the soliloquy. Brutus and the conspirators are discussing how they should kill Caesar.
Our course will seem too bloody, Caius Cassius,
To cut the head off and then hack the limbs,
Like wrath in death and envy afterwards; For
Antony is but a limb of Caesar.Lets be sacrificers,
but not butchers, Caius.
( II, i, 162-166)
In the passage the conspirators have decided that the best way to kill Caesar is by cutting off his head. They also say that they will be sacrificers not butchers. To me, when the conspirators say," lets be sacrificers , but not butchers".( II, i,166) , that's just a cop out
to say that they are killing Caesar in the name of the Gods, instead of the truth. Which is, they are killing Ceasar because they are jealous of him.
Recalling the first line of Brutus' soliloquy,"It must be by his death" .(II, i, 10) Virgil K. Whitaker says,"two assumptions are implicit in this remark. Caesar can be prevented from being king only by killing him, and killing a ruler is justified only if he is a tyrant".1Also in that same passage," I know no cause to spurn at him".(II, i , 11) Virgil K. Whitaker goes on to say:
Shakespeare has done his best to make the
fallacies in the reasoning obvious. Brutus says
explicity that he has no evidence to support the
conclusion that Caesar will become immoral and
that he must kill on an assumption without basis.
His error in assuming that he is acting for the Roman
people is proved by later events.2
Whitaker is right, Brutus makes a bad judgment based on a very outrageous assumption.
Adrien Bonjur idea of the first passage is very different from Virgil Whitaker's. He goes on to say.
This opening is at the same time a conclusion and thus
delicately suggests the longer inner conflict which has been
surging in Brutus's soul: it lends the whole monologue its
real perspective and depth.3
Here Adrien Bonjur says that the opening suggests a longer inner conflict that has been building up inside and waiting to come out. Robert Ornstein writes about the same passage,
It may be a common proof that power corrupts, but there is
no evidence , by Brutus' own candid admission, that Ceasar,
who has already risen to the heights of power-who
dominates Rome-has been corrupted. Thus despite the
general truth of Brutus' observations, his actual decision
to kill Caesar is based upon an almost incredible assumption: that the act of coronation will change the
nature of a man long accustomed to great power, whose
past( in Brutus' eyes) has been blameless and whose
temper is rational.4

A brief summary of the passage is Brutus is not jealous of Ceasar, but Cassius convinces Brutus that once Caesar is in power,
he will become a tyrant and enslave the people of Rome.
Figurative language as related to the thesis is foreshadowing, and a soliloquy occurs in (II, i , 10-34). Foreshadowing is used when Brutus said "he would rather be a village than to repute himself a son of Rome". This is an example of foreshadowing because Brutus says he would do anything to not be Caesar's slave even kill him. This is implying that he would probably be apart of the assassination attempt on Ceasar. Shakespeare's choice of words in the passage are nothing jealous, not at all doubting; work me of, persuade me of and aim meaning idea. All of these words in one meaning or
another, have something to do with persuading someone.
In conclusion, I would like to say that the passage I have chosen is very instrumental to the play. If Brutus doesn't join the conspiracy against Caesar, the story probably would have turned out much different and Caesar would likely still be alive.


Scott, Mark. Shakespeare Criticism. Detroit; Book Toweson Press, 1987.

Return to 123HelpMe.com