Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
positive effects of population growth on economic development
population growth and economic development research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Solow's Neo-Classical Model
The neo-classical growth model assumes that the economy converges towards a steady-state rate of growth. Given a neo-classical production function:
Y=A×F(K, N)
Assuming a constant rate of labor force growth (DN/N=n) and no technical progress (DA/A=0) then in a steady state rate of growth of output (DY/Y) equals rate of population growth which implies there is no growth in per capita income unless technical progress takes place.
A critical difference between the Harrod-Domar model and the neoclassical growth model lies in the effect the savings rate has on growth rates. In the Harrod-Domar model an increase in the savings rate increases the growth rate. However, in the neo classical model, an increase in the savings rate increases the per capita income but it does not result in a permanent (as compared to a temporary) increase in the growth rate.
To summarize, in the neo-classical model the rate of output growth equals the rate of growth of technical progress (DA/A) and the level per capita output is determined by the steady-state equation:
sy=(d+n)k
where s: savings rate
y: per capita output
d: depreciation rate of capital stock
n: population growth rate
k: per capita capital stock
While Solow’s neo-classical model explains the first five out of the six stylized facts quite well, it cannot explain the fact that growth rates differ between countries for long periods of time. This model would suggest convergence in growth rates, something that does not seem to take place (see table).
To explain this problem, theorists have focused their attention on technical progress and have made attempts to make the growth rate endogenous (i.e. determined within the theory). Various endogenous growth theory models, proposed by economists like Robert Lucas and Paul Romer, have constructed a dynamic model where the rate of growth of output depends on aggregate stock of capital (both physical and human) and on the level of research and development in an economy.
Suppose that real GDP per capita of the United States is $32,000 and its growth rate is 2% per
Slow, growth causes few jobs to be created as it means a slower rate of
Robert E. Lucas Jr.’s journal article, “Some Macroeconomics for the 21st Century” in the Journal of Economic Perspectives, uses both his own and other economist’s models to track and predict economic industrialization and growth by per capita income. Using models of growth on a country wide basis, Lucas is able to track the rate at which nations become industrialized, and the growth rate of the average income once industrialization has taken place. In doing so, he has come to the conclusion that the average rate of growth among industrialized nations is around 2% for the last 30 years, but is higher the closer the nation is to the point in time that it first industrialized. This conclusion is supported by his models, and is a generally accepted idea. Lucas goes on to say that the farther we get from the industrial revolution the average growth rate is more likely to hit 1.5% as a greater percentage of countries become industrialized.
To begin many theories hold a number of assumptions about the markets, but neoclassical takes this to an extreme. NGT assumes that there is full employment, no externalities or transportation costs and perfect competition just to name a few from the slew of others. This large amount of assumption is one reason why Romer established EGT in his 1986 dissertation (Fine) . These assumption are numerous and rather important in an economy and to assume all of these things it starts to take away from its real world application. Endogenous growth theory seeks to explain many of the assumptions that NGT hold constant. One such assumption is that technology is a constant and steady
Economic growth could be defined as the increasing in value of goods and the service, which is produced by economy. The increase is realized by increasing investment and the number of investment is depends on savings.
...e (HI) and low initial income and low growth (LILG) is not consistent with convergence process, due to the fact that former has already achieved steady state and the later yet not approached convergence. The coefficient of convergence is not significant for low initial income and high growth (LIHG), hence weak evidence. The reason may be of, time-lag in, the diffusion of technology from developed to developing countries, causing a big hindrance.
The End of Growth, by Richard Heinberg, goes into deep discussion of the current state of the economy and the its future state when growth ceases. Richard Heinberg discusses current trends within the economy that predict our eventual result. The author makes it very clear that growth is important. As a society, and a planet, we depend on growth. However, certain types of growth, specifically economic growth, are on a path to destruction. He suggests that we find a different definition of growth and focus on that instead of growing from an economic standpoint. Throughout the book, Heinberg uses the image of a balloon to describe our situation. He depicts our society as a balloon that is getting pumped up to be too large and will eventually pop. In other words,
Rostow, Walt W. 1960. The stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Every year there is a ‘league table‘ published showing the level of economic growth achieved by each country. The comparison is made using each countries Gross Domestic Product, or GDP. An important factor to look at is the difference between actual and potential economic growth. Actual economic growth increases in real GDP. This increase can occur as result of using previously unemployed resources, or reallocating resources into more productive areas or improving existing resources. Whereas potential economic growth is the productive capacity of the economy. For example, it can be shown by the predicted ability of the country to produce goods and services. This changes when there is an increase in the quantity or quality of the resources. All countries have different ways of achieving this with the resources they have available to them. For this reason it party answers the question of why some countries are richer than others. It is widely thought that the productive capacity of an economy will increase each year largely due to improvements in education and technology. This will obviously differ from country to country. For example, in the UK the quality of fertilizer could be improved, hence forth increase the years fruit and vegetable output.
Walt Whitman Rostow is United Stated economist, and also a father of ecomonic theory and growth. In Rostow view through his Stages of Growth Model, there are five stages in the process of economic growth and development. The five stages are The traditional society, The precondition for take off. The take off, The drive to maturity and The age of mass consumption. In these stages Rostow point out that both of the precondition stage for take off and take off stages is very important for a country economy growth. Capital and Technology raising, is one of the most important factor for a country to achieve economic maturity for economic development. After the end of the take off stages, in general most of the economies experienced lower economic growth rates. Also at the end of the stages, the age of mass consumption, is only for country that the most people there already live in the prosperity. The country that already on these stage is mainly from West.
where “three decades” refers to the 1980-2005 period. Also, data shows that between 1960 and 1980, average per capita growth in all countries of the world grew 83 percent, while in the globalisation era (1980-2000), it fell to 33 percent.2 Another shortcoming of classical economics was found in the so-called Leontief paradox (1953), when Wassily Leontief observed that “the most capital-abundant country in the world by any criterion”3, the US, exported labour-intensive commodities and imported capital-intensive ones, thus undermining the validity of the Heckscher-Ohlin model at its very
It is important to understand the foundation of this critical branch of economics. According to Zafirovski (96), classical theory’s fundamental principle is that economy is self‐regulating. Based on this theory, economy always has the potential for realizing the natural GDP level of the real output, which is the level of real GDP achieved when the resources of an economy are fully utilized (Canto, Joines and Laffer 52). Even though there are issues that arise within a certain period forcing economies to exceed or even fall below the natural real GDP level, there exists self-regulatory techniques within the market systems that always work in bringing the economy back to the natural real GDP level (Keynes 109). It is important to note that the classical principle, which holds that the economy is at or close to the natural level of real GDP-is founded on two strong beliefs, which include the Say's Law as well as the belief that wages, prices as well as interest rates are
Economic growth focuses on encouraging firms to invest or encouraging people to save, which in turn creates funds for firms to invest. It runs hand-in-hand with the goal of high employment because in order for firms to be comfortable investing in assets such as plants and equipment, unemployment must be low. Hereby, the people and resources will be available to spur economic growth.
Theoretical model of modern economic growth shows that long-term economic growth and raise the level of per capita income depends on technological progress. This is because of without technological progress and with the increase of capital per capita, marginal returns of capital would diminish and output per capita growth would eventually stagnate (Solow, 1956; Swan, 1956). Studies have shown that “experience, skills and knowledge in the long-term economic growth is playing an increasingly important role” (World Bank, 1999). Despite how technological progress work on economic growth, and how there are different views on the role of in the end, but I am afraid no one would deny that technical progress in the important role of economic development. In this sense, for a country to achieve long-term economic growth, we must continue to promote technological progress. However, economic growth theory is analyzed in general, and usually under the assumption that in the closed economy, and technological progress in a country not normally have taken place in various departments at the same time, and now the economy are often increasingly open economy. In this way, the technological progress in different economic impact on a country may be quite different. In addition, we assume that technological progress is Hicks neutral, is to an industry in itself, but technological progress also reflects the establishment of new industries and development. The new industries and technology-intensive industries generally older than the high, the use of less labor. Even the old industries, the general trend of technological progress is labor-saving.
In order for any country to survive in comparison to another developed country they must be able to grow and sustain a healthy and flourishing economy. This paper is designed to give a detailed insight of economic growth and the sectors that influence economic growth. Economic growth in a country is essential to the reduction of poverty, without such reduction; poverty would continue to increase therefore economic growth is inevitable. Through economic growth, it is also an aid in the reduction of the unemployment rate and it also helps to reduce the budget deficit of the government. Economic growth can also encourage better living standards for all it is citizens because with economic growth there are improvements in the public sectors, educational and healthcare facilities. Through economic growth social spending can also be increased without an increase of taxes.