Essay Color Key

Free Essays
Unrated Essays
Better Essays
Stronger Essays
Powerful Essays
Term Papers
Research Papers





Principles of Criminal Liability

Rate This Paper:

Length: 1086 words (3.1 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Red (FREE)      
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Principles of Criminal Liability
"Law, with all its weaknesses, is all that stands between civilization
and barbarism" (John Derbyshire)

Criminal Liability is what unlocks the logical structure of the
Criminal Law. Each element of a crime that the prosecutor needs to
prove (beyond a reasonable doubt) is a principle of criminal
liability. There are some crimes that only involve a subset of all the
principles of liability, and these are called "crimes of criminal
conduct". Burglary, for example, is such a crime because all you need
to prove beyond a reasonable doubt is an actus reusconcurring with a
mens rea. On the other hand, there are crimes that involve all the
principles of liability, and these are called "true crimes". Homicide,
for example, is such a crime because you need to prove actus reus,
mens rea, concurrence, causation, and harm. The requirement that the
prosecutor must prove each element of criminal liability beyond a
reasonable doubt is called the "corpus delicti rule".

Liability needs to be distinguished from the following concepts:

* culpability (purposely, knowingly, recklessly, negligently) -
infers intent

* capacity (infancy, intoxication, insanity) - capacity defenses

* responsibility (volition, free will, competency) - presumptions

There are five principles of liability in Criminal Law:

* Principle of Actus Reus

* Principle of Mens Rea

* Principle of Concurrence

* Principle of Causation

* Principle of Resulting Harm

THE PRINCIPLE OF ACTUS REUS

· involuntariness -- sleepwalking, hypnotic behavior, etc. are seen as
examples of acting upon forces beyond individual control, and are
therefore not normally included in the principle of actus reus.
However, certain "voluntarily induced involuntary acts" such as drowsy
driving might arguably be included if the prior voluntary act created
the risk of a future involuntary act.

· manifest criminality -- caught red-handed, clear-cut case of actus
reusproven beyond a reasonable doubt

· possession -- the law recognizes various degrees of this. Actual
possession means physically on your person. Constructive possession
means physically under your control. Knowing possession means you know
what you are possessing. Mere possession means you don't know what you
are possessing. Unwitting possession is when something has been
planted on you. The only punishable types of possession are the ones
that are conscious and knowable.

· procuring -- obtaining things with the intent of using them for
criminal purposes; e.g., precursor chemicals for making narcotics,
"pimping" for a prostitute, and procuring another to commit a crime
("accessory before the fact")

· status or condition -- sometimes a chronic condition qualifies as
action, e.g., drug addiction, alcoholism, on the assumption that first
use is voluntary. Sometimes the condition, e.g. chronic alcoholism, is
treated as a disease which exculpates an individual. Most often, it's
the punishment aspect of criminal law in these kinds of cases that
triggers an 8th Amendment issue. Equal Protection and other
constitutional issues may be triggered.

· thoughts -- sometimes, not often, the expression of angry thoughts,
e.g., "I'll kill you for that" is taken as expressing the resolution
and will to commit a crime, but in general, thoughts are not part of
the principle of actus reus. Daydreaming and fantasy are also not
easily included in the principle of mens rea.

· words -- these are considered "verbal acts"; e.g. sexual harassment,
solicitation, terroristic threats, assault, inciting to riot.

THE PRINCIPLE OF MENS REA

· circumstantial -- determination of mens rea through indirect
evidence

· confessions -- clear-cut direct evidence of mens rea beyond a
reasonable doubt

· constructive intent -- one has the constructive intent to kill if
they are driving at high speeds on an icy road with lots of
pedestrians around, e.g.

· general intent -- the intent to commit the actus reusof the crime
one is charged with; e.g., rape and intent to penetrate

· specific intent -- the intent to do something beyond the actus reusof
the crime one is charged with; e.g., breaking and entering with intent
to burglarize

· strict liability -- crimes requiring no mens rea; liability without
fault; corporate crime, environmental crime

· transferred intent -- the intent to harm one victim but instead harm
another

THE PRINCIPLE OF CONCURRENCE

· attendant circumstances -- some crimes have additional elements that
must accompany the criminal act and the criminal mind; e.g., rape, but
not with your wife

· enterprise liability -- in corporate law, this is the idea that both
the act and the agency (mens rea) for it can be imputed to the
corporation; e.g., product safety

· year-and-a-day rule -- common law rule that the final result of an
act must occur no later than a year and a day after the criminal state
of mind. For example, if you struck someone on the head with intent to
kill, but they didn't die until a year and two days later, you could
not be prosecuted for murder. Many states have abolished this rule or
extended the time limit. In California, it's three years.

· vicarious liability -- sometimes, under some rules, the guilty party
would not be the person who committed the act but the person who
intended the act; e.g., supervisors of employees

THE PRINCIPLE OF CAUSATION

· actual cause -- a necessary but not sufficient condition to prove
causation beyond a reasonable doubt; prosecutor must also prove
proximate cause

· but for or sine qua non causation -- setting in motion a chain of
events that sooner or later lead to the harmful result; but for the
actor's conduct, the result would not have occurred

· intervening cause -- unforeseen events that still hold the defendant
accountable

· legal causation -- a prosecutor's logic of both actual and proximate
cause

· proximate cause -- the fairness of how far back the prosecutor goes
in the chain of events to hold a particular defendant accountable;
literally means the next or closest cause

· superceding cause -- unforeseen events that exculpate a defendant

PRINCIPLES OF RESULTING HARM

These are issues involving the law of accessories and attempts (later
lecture).

RESPONSIBILITY FOR CRIME: PRESUMPTIONS

Presumptions are court-ordered assumptions that the jury must take as
true unless rebutted by evidence. Their purpose is to simplify and
expedite the trial process. The judge, for example at some point in
testimony, may remind the jury that it is OK to assume that allpeople
form somekind of intent before or during their behavior. It is wrong,
however, for the judge to order the jury to assumeintent or a specific
kind of intent in a case. Presumptions are not a substitute for
evidence. Presumptions are supposed to be friendly reminders about
safe, scientific assumptions about human nature or human behavior in
general. The most common presumptions are:

· reminders that the accused is considered innocent until proven
guilty

· reminders that the accused is to be considered sane, normal, and
competent

It is important to understand that presumptions are not inferences.
Presumptions mustbe accepted as true by the jury. Inferences maybe
accepted as true by the jury, but the trick is to get the jury to
believe they thought of it first. Lawyers are not allowed to engage in
the practice of "stacking of inferences", or basing an inference
solely upon another inference. Lawyers are also prohibited by logic
from making certain "impermissible inferences" and here's an example
of how the logic goes:

Evidence admitted:

Inferences that can be drawn:

Witnesses testify that X repeatedly hit Y on the head with a club
until stopped by passerbys

Intent to kill or seriously injure; Purposely or Knowingly using club
as deadly weapon.

Witnesses testify that X repeatedly hit Y on the head with a rolled-up
newspaper

Intent to kill cannot be inferred; newspaper cannot be construed as a
deadly weapon

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Principles of Criminal Liability." 123HelpMe.com. 30 Aug 2014
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=122818>.




Related Searches





Important Note: If you'd like to save a copy of the paper on your computer, you can COPY and PASTE it into your word processor. Please, follow these steps to do that in Windows:

1. Select the text of the paper with the mouse and press Ctrl+C.
2. Open your word processor and press Ctrl+V.

Company's Liability

123HelpMe.com (the "Web Site") is produced by the "Company". The contents of this Web Site, such as text, graphics, images, audio, video and all other material ("Material"), are protected by copyright under both United States and foreign laws. The Company makes no representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of the Material or about the results to be obtained from using the Material. You expressly agree that any use of the Material is entirely at your own risk. Most of the Material on the Web Site is provided and maintained by third parties. This third party Material may not be screened by the Company prior to its inclusion on the Web Site. You expressly agree that the Company is not liable or responsible for any defamatory, offensive, or illegal conduct of other subscribers or third parties.

The Materials are provided on an as-is basis without warranty express or implied. The Company and its suppliers and affiliates disclaim all warranties, including the warranty of non-infringement of proprietary or third party rights, and the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. The Company and its suppliers make no warranties as to the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of the material, services, text, graphics and links.

For a complete statement of the Terms of Service, please see our website. By obtaining these materials you agree to abide by the terms herein, by our Terms of Service as posted on the website and any and all alterations, revisions and amendments thereto.



Return to 123HelpMe.com

Copyright © 2000-2013 123HelpMe.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Service