# The Relationship between the Angle of Elevation of a Ramp and the Speed of a Bal

Length: 2227 words (6.4 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Excellent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#### Text Preview

The Relationship between the Angle of Elevation of a Ramp and the Speed of a Ball

Introduction

In this piece of coursework I'm going to investigate and measure the
speed of the ball rolling down a ramp. From the data that I'm going to
collect I'm going to be able to work out the Gravitational potential
energy when changing the height, the friction force acting on the ball
whilst it rolling down, and finally the kinetic energy exerted by the
ball.

Planning

Fair Testing

Before I would start the experiment I would have to devise a suitable
method that would provide a safe test, which is fair and accurate. In
this experiment I'm going to have to roll down a ball whilst changing
the angle of elevation of the ramp, and the factors that would have an
effect on the accuracy of the output results are;

Ã˜ Size of the ball

Ã˜ Heaviness of the ball

Ã˜ Length of the ramp

Ã˜ Height of the ramp

Ã˜ Texture of the ball

Ã˜ Smoothness of the ramp

Ã˜ Angle of ramp from the ground surface

Here in this experiment the only factor that I'm going to change would
be the height of the ramp which in turn would affect the angle of the
ramp too, if the length of the ramp stays constant.

For the experiment to be a fair one I have to;

Ã˜ Keep all the factors that affect the experiment constant except the
ones that I'm testing.

Ã˜ All the experiments have to be done by the same person on the same
day, because if we changed the person that is doing the experiment it
may lead to different reaction times making the experiment inaccurate

Ã˜ All I have to change is the height of the of the ramp from the
ground it's resting on. And by keeping the length of the ramp constant
that would in turn proportionally change the angle of the ramp.

If I managed to keep all the factors that I need constant, constant

## Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

MLA Citation:
"The Relationship between the Angle of Elevation of a Ramp and the Speed of a Bal." 123HelpMe.com. 14 Dec 2017
<http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=122673>.
Title Length Color Rating
- Angle of Geese and Other Poems MOMADAY had been writing poetry since his college days at University of New Mexico, and this volume incorporates many of his earlier efforts. Momaday admired the poetry of Hart Crane as an undergraduate, and early poems like "Los Alamos" show Crane's influence. Under the tutelage of Yvor Winters at Stanford Momaday developed an ability to provide clear, precise details and images in his verse. As a graduate student at Stanford, Momaday absorbed the influence of an eclectic group of poets including Emily Dickinson, Wallace Stevens, Paul Valery, Charles Baudelaire, and Frederick Goddard Tuckerman, the subject of Momaday's PhD dissertation....   [tags: Momaday's Angle of Geese]
:: 1 Works Cited
538 words
(1.5 pages)
Good Essays
- Investigating the Relationship Between the Braking Distance of a Toy Car and the Height of the Ramp Planning To carry out this experiment safely I will ensure that the necessary safety precautions are taken place. Goggles and lab coats should be worn during the experiment. All likely safety hazards are eliminated. I will make sure the ramp is placed on the table in a stable manner and that I will ensure that the ramp is not too high. The procedure of this experiment is to first get a ramp of suitable length, and place onto the bench....   [tags: Papers] 582 words
(1.7 pages)
Strong Essays
- Investigating the Relationship Between the Lengths, Perimeter and Area of a Right Angle Triangle Coursework Aim To investigate the relationships between the lengths, perimeter and area of a right angle triangle. Pythagoras Theorem is a² + b² = c². 'a' being the shortest side, 'b' being the middle side and 'c' being the longest side of a right angled triangle. So the (smallest number)² + (middle number)² = (largest number)² The number 3, 4 and 5 satisfy this condition 3² + 4² = 5² because 3² = 3 x 3 = 9 4² = 4 x 4 = 16 5² = 5 x 5 = 25 and so 3² + 4² = 9 + 16 = 25 = 5² The numbers 5,12, 13 and 7,24,25 also work for this theorem 5² + 12² = 1...   [tags: Papers] 2080 words
(5.9 pages)
Strong Essays
- Factors Determining the Stopping Distance of Rollers Down a Ramp Theory- ------- When the roller is rolling down the slope then potential energy is converted to kinetic energy that converts into heat energy. MGH = Â½MVsquared The loss of kinetic energy on the carpet is â€¦. Â½MVsquared = braking force x braking distance thereforeâ€¦. Â½Mvsquared = F x so MGH = F x [IMAGE] If m, g and f are constant thenâ€¦. [IMAGE] However if G is constant thenâ€¦. [IMAGE] Soâ€¦....   [tags: Papers] 1777 words
(5.1 pages)
Strong Essays
- Assessed Experiment on the Efficiency of a Ramp Planning ======== I am investigating the efficiency of a ramp depending on the mass of the load , the height of the ramp or the angle. I have chosen the amount of load to be lifted up the ramp because I think I can get a more accurate set of results this way. The ramp is a basic but very effective way of moving objects to a greater height more easily than simply lifting. Fair Test · I will take all of my results on the same day with the same equipment and area....   [tags: Free Essays] 428 words
(1.2 pages)
Strong Essays
- It’s been nearly 20 years since my high school graduation. Just as time has passed, technology has advanced, and so has the elevation of drug use. As I reflect back in regards to the drug taking behavior I can recall that there was a stereotype of those who were labeled drug users. Several factors contributed to using drugs, but the one factor that was and still prevalent was peer pressure. This is a time in the adolescent’s life when peer approval is an essential component for the direction of his or her behavior....   [tags: peers, marijuana, recreation] 1104 words
(3.2 pages)
Strong Essays
- The Effect of Height of a Ramp on the Speed of a Trolley For this piece of coursework, I intend to investigate the relationship between the heights of a ramp to the change in speed. I will be measuring the speed from these heights: - * 5cm * 10cm * 15cm * 20cm * 25cm. Formula AIM The aim of this investigation is to find out what the relationship his between the height or a ramp and the change in speed. Hypothesis The greater the height of the ramp the more the speed of the trolley would increase....   [tags: Papers] 1129 words
(3.2 pages)
Strong Essays
- Projectile Motion Lab Introduction: The purpose of this experiment was to find how changing the angle and velocity would affect the distance the object went, height the object went, and time the object was in the air. Before this lab I could not tell how the angle and velocity would change the results. I needed to figure out what angle and what velocity made the object go farther or make it stay in the air longer. I also found mass will affect the height and distance. I used the site Galileo and Einstein to figure out these factors....   [tags: angle, velocity, distance relationship]
:: 1 Works Cited
696 words
(2 pages)
Strong Essays
- Investigating the Factors that Affect the Acceleration of a Ball Bearing Down a Ramp I intend to investigate what factors affect the acceleration of a ball bearing down a ramp. I will measure how long the ball bearing takes to roll down a ramp, and my other variable will be to measure the final velocity of the ball bearing rolling down the ramp. Using this information I will then be able to work out the acceleration of the ball bearing down the ramp....   [tags: Papers] 1916 words
(5.5 pages)
Strong Essays
- Have you ever been driving down the road and approach a turn too fast. What happens. You and the car undergo centrifugal force and you as well as the car are pushed away from the turn, or up the grade also know as a superelevation. An engineer must balance this force raising the grade on one side of the road. It should be noted that under theoretical observations steering would be effortless but in order to provide these ideal conditions the friction factor would be zero and the vehicle weight would balance the centrifugal force¹....   [tags: physics science] 550 words
(1.6 pages)
Strong Essays

### Related Searches

and would provide expected results then my experiment would be a fair
and accurate test.

Preliminary Work

Golf Ball

Height of Slope

Angle of slope

Time Taken (s)

1

2

3

4

6

1.7

4.1

4.24

4.19

4.16

9

2.58

3.38

3.26

3.25

3.31

12

3.44

3.1

2.92

2.19

3.03

15

4.3

2.69

2.72

2.69

2.68

18

5.16

2.44

2.36

2.33

2.37

Squash Ball

Height of Slope

Angle of slope

Time Taken(s)

1

2

3

4

6

1.7

4.87

4.79

4.79

4.73

9

2.58

3.74

3.75

3.76

3.74

12

3.44

3.34

3.25

3.27

3.24

15

4.3

2.89

2.83

2.89

2.91

18

5.16

2.60

2.67

2.53

2.62

Table Tennis Ball

Height of Slope

Angle of slope

Time Taken(s)

1

2

3

4

6

1.7

Went

4.53

5.08

5.26

9

2.58

Off

3.88

/

3.91

12

3.44

course

15

4.3

18

5.16

Tennis Ball

Height of Slope

Angle of slope

Time Taken(s)

1

2

3

4

6

1.70

6.95

5.67

6.05

5.79

9

2.58

4.65

4.91

4.79

4.82

12

3.44

3.75

3.72

3.69

3.67

15

4.30

3.22

3.19

3.12

3.18

18

5.16

2.75

2.89

2.75

2.79

Above are the preliminary results.

Selecting the most Suitable Apparatus

When looking at the preliminary results the golf ball traveled too
fast for us to be able to stop the time accurately, the table tennis
ball was too light so has gone off course most of the time, due to the
air resistance, and that was enough to deflect it. The tennis ball was
too big and I don't think it would be a good idea to use it, as we
would find it hard to place correctly on the starting point line, and
it would take too much time which might lead to anomalies. But the
squash ball to me was the most suitable ball to use, and it stays in
its path all time which is in a straight line down the ramp. In the
preliminary tests we used 3 cm think books to lift up the ramp, but I
don't think that that would be a good idea, because the books might be
compressed a bit, which would decrease the height we are aiming to
achieve. So I think I'm going to use building blocks that are 8.2cm in
height each and that would cancel out the chance of any change in the
height due to compression. When thinking about time, the most accurate
stopwatch we can get would be a 2 d.p. stopwatch and that's all we've
got. There are lots of different types of ramps out there, with
different types of surfaces but the only one that was available to me
was a wooden ramp that has a groove going through it, to provide a
path for the ball to roll through. Below is the apparatus that I'm
going to use to do the experiment.

Apparatus

* Ramp that has been graved in a straight line to provide a course
for the ball to roll through. (length of ramp is 200cm)

* Squash Ball (24.43 grams)

* Stop Watch (2.d.p accuracy)

* Building Blocks that are 8.2 cm in height each.

Prediction

I predict that the increase in the ramps angle is proportional to the
speed of the ball. So if the angle increases the speed of the ball
increases too. If the ramp was completely horizontal (angle 0o) the
velocity of the ball would be zero as there would be no way of the
gravitation pulling it through downwards, but if the ramp was put to a
small gradient the ball would roll down slowly, and as you increase
the gradient the speed of the ball increases too. But when the ramp is
put vertically (900) the ball would free fall at the speed of gravity
(9.81 m/s), due to the ramp not being there to put friction against
the ball, and to deflect its course to another direction. As I would
get different speeds, as I differentiate the steepness of the ramp, I
will have to work out the mean speed using an equation which is the
following;

Mean speed (m/s) = Distance Traveled (m) X Mean Time Taken (S)

Secondly I predict that as the Gravitational potential energy
increases, the kinetic energy also increases proportionally

Thirdly I predict that as the height of the ramp increases the G.P.E
also increases proportionally

Fourthly I predict that as the speed of the ball (squared) increases
the kinetic energy exerted is also increased proportionally.

Fifthly I predict that as the kinetic energy increases the friction
force also increases, and that the friction force is greater than the
kinetic energy.

Number

Predication

1

As the angle of the ramp increases the speed of the ball increases
proportionally.

2

As the Gravitational potential energy increases, the kinetic energy
also increases proportionally

3

As the height of the ramp increases the G.P.E also increases
proportionally

4

As the speed of the ball (squared) increases the kinetic energy
exerted is also increased proportionally.

5

As the kinetic energy increases the friction force also increases, and
that the friction force is greater than the kinetic energy.

So to work out the G.P.E I would use this formula;

G.P.E (j) = Weight (N) X Change in Height (m)

But to work out the weight I would first have to use this formula;

Weight= Mass (kg) X Gravity (N/Kg) Where the gravity is constant at
9.81N/Kg

To work out Kinetic energy I would use this formula;

Ek (j) = Â½ Mass (Kg) X Speed2 (m/s2)

And finally to work out the Friction force I would use;

Friction Force (j) = G.P.E (j) - K.E. (j)

Number & Range of Readings

As my main non constant value would be the height, I will have to
choose the heights that I'm able to have using the building blocks. I
will have six different heights which I think would give me a large
range of results. The heights would be 8.2, 16.4, 24.6, 32.8, 41 and
49.2 centimeters. To work out how big the angles are I have to use
this formula;

Angle = sin-1(Opp/Hyp)

Angle = sin-1(height of ramp/200)

So the angles of the heights are;

Height (cm)

8.2cm

16.4cm

24.6cm

32.8cm

41cm

49.2cm

Angle (Ã˜0)

2.3490

4.7030

7.0650

9.4390

11.8290

14.2410

For each height I think a suitable number of readings would be five of
each height, which would make any anomalous results appear clearly,
and would also when taken out average would get rid or minor errors

Methodology

Firstly I would collect the apparatus, and then I would set it up. (As
shown below.) then I would with a red marker, mark down the starting
point, then the end point which is exactly 200cm. I did this so that
I'd be able to start the ball from the same position, and end it the
same for all the tests. After it being set up, I draw an empty table
of results, so that I would fill it in as I do each experiment. Then I
would place the squash ball which is 24.43g and has a diameter of
3.9cm. at the starting point, and hold it with one hand, and have my
other hand on the stop watch so that I let go of the ball, and start
the stop watch together, to get rid of ad much human error, then I
would stop the stopwatch as the ball crosses the finish line, which
would be placed 200cm after the starting line. I would repeat that for
every height respectively, five times each. After I finish all the
heights, and all their repeats, I would take apart the apparatus
carefully, and place each part in its designated place.

[IMAGE]

Safety

One of the most important aspects of the experiment is safety. As it
would be the safety of my colleagues in the class. So I would have to
handle every thing very cautiously incase the ramp or the building
blocks fall on someone and injure them. So I will have to do my best
to avoid such accidents from happening.

Results;

Height

Angle

Time Taken

Speed average

(cm)

1

2

3

4

5

Average

m/s

8.2

2.349

4.37

4.44

4.44

4.41

4.41

4.414

0.453

16.4

4.703

2.75

2.8

2.81

2.84

2.88

2.816

0.710

24.6

7.065

2.37

2.37

2.44

2.44

2.39

2.402

0.832

32.8

9.439

1.96

1.97

2.03

2.03

2.03

2.004

0.998

41

11.829

1.78

1.78

1.78

1.85

1.82

1.802

1.109

49.2

14.241

1.75

1.75

1.71

1.72

1.69

1.724

1.160

Weight = 0.2343 X 9.81

Weight = 2.298483 Newton's

G.P.E Results; G.P.E (j) = Weight (N) X Change in Height (m)

Height

Weight

G.P.E

(m)

(N)

(J)

0.082

2.29848

0.188476

0.164

2.298483

0.376951

0.246

2.298483

0.565427

0.328

2.298483

0.753902

0.41

2.298483

0.942378

0.492

2.298483

1.130854

K.E Results; Ek (j) = Â½ Mass (Kg) X Speed2 (m/s2)

Mass

Speed^2

K.E.

(Kg)

(m/s)^2

(J)

0.2343

0.205303

0.024051

0.2343

0.504423

0.059093

0.2343

0.693288

0.081219

0.2343

0.996012

0.116683

0.2343

1.231829

0.144309

0.2343

1.345815

0.157662

Friction Force Results; Friction Force (j) = G.P.E (j) - K.E. (j)

G.P.E

K.E

Friction Force

(J)

(J)

(J)

0.188476

0.024051

0.164424357

0.376951

0.059093

0.317858083

0.565427

0.081219

0.484208072

0.753902

0.116683

0.637219622

0.942378

0.144309

0.798069265

1.130854

0.157662

0.973191371

Analyzing your Evidence & Drawing Conclusions

Graph Number

Graph

1

Angle of Ramp against Speed of Ball

2

G.P.E against K.E

3

Height of ramp against G.P.E

4

Speed of Ball squared against Kinetic energy exerted

5

Kinetic energy against Friction Force

Graph number one, provides evidence for my first prediction, which is
that as the angle of elevation increase the speed of the ball
increases too. And the graph shows that by starting first starting
off, and going in a positively skewed straight line. This happened
because as the angle increases the G.P.E increases and the friction
force acting on the ball decreases because the gravity force
strengthens.

Graph number two, shows that as the G.P.E increase the Kinetic energy
increases. Because if we increase the height of the ramp, the G.P.E
would increase proportionally as we would see in graph three. And when
the G.P.E increases this means that when the object is moving
downwards the kinetic energy also increases, because there would be
more speed when rolling down. And that graph and results fully support
my prediction number two, which states that when Gravitational
potential energy increases the Kinetic energy also increases
proportionally.

Graph number three, shows how the G.P.E is affected by the height of
the ramp in centimeters. And the graph shows a positive gradient of
0.23J/cm this means that every centimeter you increase on the ramp
that I'm using the gravitational potential energy increases too by
0.23 joules. And that supports my prediction number three, which was
as the ramp height increases the G.P.E increases also proportionally.
Which also shows that the further away the object from the ground the
more G.P.E it's got stored in it, ready to be let out as Kinetic
energy.

Graph number four, after working out the gradient on the graph, shows
that as every one joule is added, would increase the speed of the ball
by 9m/s. which supports my prediction number four which states that as
the speed of the ball increase would mean that the kinetic energy
would also increase proportionally. And that also proves that if an
object wanted to move it would need a specific amount of kinetic
energy but if it wanted to go faster or stronger, it would need more
kinetic energy, that statement works both ways.

Graph number five, shows the proportionality between the friction
force and the kinetic energy. And the graph shows that at small amount
they are proportional but when they increase the friction becomes
bigger than the kinetic energy, in which that decreases the
efficiency, and loses energy as heats energy.

K.E *100 = percentage useful energy used

G.P.E

0.024051*100=24.051/0.188476=12.76% percent of the G.P.E transforms
into useful kinetic energy, the rest 87.24% is wasted as heat energy.
And that proves my last prediction which states that the friction
force is greater than the kinetic force!

During this experiment I have tested the relationships between the
height of a ramp and the speed of a ball rolling down it. Through this
I have come in to contact with the G.P.E, K.E. and the Friction
Forces. Which occurs relying on the variation in the height of the
ramp and the speed of the ball. All my predictions have been proved
using the graphs and the results, as my results were very accurate
except for a couple of anomalous results occurring. These anomalous
results may occur due toâ€¦:

Ã˜ Timing the stop watch incorrectly, for example, letting the ball
roll first then pressing the start button on the stop watch a quarter
of a second later may alter the tests accuracy dramatically.

Ã˜ The grooves on the ramp might have parts that decrease the speed of
the ball.

Ã˜ The ball was not accelerating the whole time at the same
acceleration, which that would make a difference when it came to do
the calculations.

I don't think repeating any more test for results would make it more
accurate cause I've already had carried out 5 samples of each test.

I think I have carried out a suitable range of results but there was
an area for improvement as I could have investigated larger heights,
which would mean larger angles.

Improvements

Things that I would improve in this experiment are;

Ã˜ Lager range of heights and angles

Ã˜ Larger variety of ball to use

Ã˜ A different surface for the ball to roll on, a smoother surface,
such as plastic, or metal, with would reduce friction

Ã˜ A stop watch that is connected to the computer, and uses lasers to
start and stop the stopwatch when the ball rolls through them.

Ã˜ Shorter ramp to keep the ball accelerating.

The whole experiment was a success in that I gained knowledge of
things I didn't know before, I have carried out the experiment safely,
fairly and accurately.