The Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes
The terms "Suffragist" and "Suffragette" began to be used when the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) and the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) began to start fighting for the right of women to vote in general elections. Although the two sets of franchise fighters were fighting for the same cause, their methods of doing so were completely different.
The Suffragists were peaceful, and were the original members of the NUWSS. They believed that the way to votes for women was by using peaceful and legal ways to try and win the vote. Its campaign was entitled "Voiceless London", and they spread their hopes by putting forward
…show more content…
However, many women felt that these peaceful methods were not working, and in order for them to work, more extreme action had to be taken. These women became known as suffragettes.
Some of these women, broke away from the NUWSS and joined the newly-formed WSPU, created in 1903 by Emmeline Pankhurst. In 1905, the WSPU decided to take stronger action due to the failure of using peaceful and legal methods, as bills were constantly being turned away from the House of Commons and not many people were accepting that women should be allowed to vote. Their tactics started off quite quietly, with suffragettes being arrested for holding meetings outside of the House of Commons. The arrests soon began to become more frequent, with suffragettes being arrested for speaking to the crowd outside Liberal Party elections, and refusing to pay fines thus being sent to jail. However, they were quickly gaining popularity and they moved to London in 1906, to be nearer the capital. They soon declared war on the Liberal party for not fulfilling their promises. The suffragettes targeted Liberal
…show more content…
They realised by doing this, they could take advantage of the Liberal party.
Those who were arrested still helped out with the cause. They took part in hunger striking, which led to forced feeding. This was a huge propaganda advantage for the WSPU as it showed their members having tubes down their throat being forced against their will. The WSPU took pictures of staged prison scenarios, which looked as if the suffragettes were being mistreated.
A demonstration took place at Oxford Street in March 1912, where suffragettes broke every shop in the road. Over 200 suffragettes were arrested. This was a big blow to the WSPU, and other suffragettes were arrested for setting fire to theatres, post-boxes and cinemas.
In 1914, the WSPU split, due to some members disagreeing whether the level of violence was helping. The increased action of suffragettes had also ended any co-operation between the WSPU and the NUWSS, and they were left on their own.
However, Emmeline Pankhurst still called for more violence and the greens on golf courses were soaked in acid, public places like railways were destroyed and two bombs were placed in the
The Way in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different There were two different types of groups that were trying to get the vote for the women. These were The Suffragists and The Suffragettes. They were similar in the way that they both wanted the vote for women, but were very different in the tactics that were used for this. The Suffragists were formed in the 1890's, and they believed in peace. methods of campaigning and re-election.
Women were trying to get the vote for many years before 1900, however this was not a serious concern and they were not doing much to achieve this. However in 1900 this all changed. The NUWSS (Suffragists) and the WSPU (Suffragettes) were set up in the early years of 1900; their goal was to allow women to get the vote. Their reason was that women were already allowed to work on city councils and become doctors, some notable ones too such as Florence Nightingale. The NUWSS believed that if women were house owners and had respectable jobs they should be allowed to vote. This is because men who were allowed to vote could be white slave owners and lunatics so why could these men vote and women could not? Notably however Queen Elizabeth herself proclaimed that women should not get muddled up with the world of politics.
A women suffrage amendment was brought to the U.S. Congress in 1868 but failed to win support as well as a second amendment in 1878. In 1869 a woman named Elizabeth Cady Stanton got together with Susan B. Anthony, a women’s rights activist, and organized an association called the National Woman Suffrage Association. With this union they would gather with women and fight for women’s suffrage. Later, in 1890 they joined with their competitor the American Women Suffrage Association and became the National American Women Suffrage Association. “NAWSA adopted a moderate approach to female suffrage, eschewing some of the more radical feminism of other women’s rights groups in favor of a national plan designed to gain widespread support” (3). What the association did was they changed their initial tactic towards suffrage for women so that they can be able to obtain support from all over. Having little to no movement on the national front, suffragists took the next step to sate level. That was when Eastern states granted women suffrage, but hadn’t spread to Western states.
and spent the night a few nights in jail after refusing to pay a fine
Women's Suffrage in the right of women to share political privileges on equal terms with men, the right to vote in elections and referendums, and the right to hold public office. The women's suffrage was a worldwide issue that had begun a long time before the 19th century. The issues involving women's right to vote was aroused in 1839 when the American Missionary Association began to work to develop education opportunities for blacks and other minorities in the U.S. which begun with the defending of the slaves of the Amistad. (Banner, Lois W. 1,NP)
Women, like black slaves, were treated unequally from the male before the nineteenth century. The role of the women played the part of their description, physically and emotionally weak, which during this time period all women did was took care of their household and husband, and followed their orders. Women were classified as the “weaker sex” or below the standards of men in the early part of the century. Soon after the decades unfolded, women gradually surfaced to breathe the air of freedom and self determination, when they were given specific freedoms such as the opportunity for an education, their voting rights, ownership of property, and being employed.
The Ways in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different Although the Suffragists may be forgotten in history, they were as active as Suffragettes and it was with the input of both of their equally different methods that the vote won. Suffragettes were militant, resourceful, intelligent and determined and used violence and mainly illegal tactics to cause trouble and get themselves into the publics eye to bring awareness to their cause. Suffragists felt they were clearer about what they wanted to achieve and how they were going to achieve it. They weren't opposed to the suffragette methods; they just didn't believe that they would work and felt that the less dangerous, legal methods would win for them in the end.
The Differences Between the Methods of the Suffragists and the Suffragettes For women to campaign for being able to vote they were two main organisations involved in trying to make this successful for women. Their names were first the NUWSS were the suffragists group. The NUWSS were formed in 1897. Mrs Millicent Garret Fawcett was its president.
What does “movement” mean? There are many definitions for the word. In this case, I am referring to a political meaning. Movement is a series of organized activities working toward an objective. There have been many groups in history to start up movements throughout the decades. One that stands out to me the most is the Women’s Suffrage Movement. Women’s movements are led by powerful, courageous women who push to better the lives’ of women or lives’ of others. Most familiar movements are those involved in politics, in efforts to change the roles and status of womanhood in society. Groups of women also attempt to improve lives of others with the help of religious and charitable activities. Either it was a political, religious, or charitable women’s movement, each woman of each group have made an impact on today’s view of women and achieved greater political involvement.
Women had an arduous time trying to demand the rights they deserved to have. Women suffragist made associations and paraded down the street to endeavor rights. Two associations were made up, the National Woman Suffrage Association and the American Women Suffrage Association. The National Women Suffrage Association is also known as NWSA was developed by Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. This association work for suffrage at the federal level. They tried press for more extensive institutional changes, such as married women being granted right to own land. The American Women Suffrage Association is also known as AWSA was developed by Lucy Stone and Julia Ward Howe. This association aimed to secure the ballot through state legislation. The ladies at NWSA refused to endorse the amendment because it did not give women the ballot. However the ladies at AWSA argued that once the black man was enfranchised, women would achieve their goal.(Buechler) With making associations, suffragist would march together in a parade down streets. All women who believed in the women’s suffrage movement came together, not caring what class each other are in since the demands were the same for all who marched. The intent of the parades were to dazzle and impress observers and gain recruiters, as well grab the attention of legislators who ignore the suffragist petitions and dispel unfav...
Effectiveness of Suffragists and Suffragettes The suffragists and suffragettes campaigned for votes for women from 1906 to 1914. The suffragists campaigned politically, organising petitions, marches and meetings. The suffragettes were violent protesters, vandalising public property, private property, and men's affairs. But how effective were these campaigns, of violence and peace. The suffragist's greatest achievement was arguably the introduction of the conciliation bill.
At the beginning of the 20th century, public order in Britain faced strained period, when women started to agitate for equal electoral rights in the aggressive way. Since 1897 women fought for the rights. Suffragists, how they were called, believed in not cruel methods such as petitions in parliament and meetings. However, afflicted with failures and that in New Zealand and in Australia women acquired the rights, some women started violent methods in 1903 to draw attention in their fight. Suffragettes. At that time they were derided in newspapers and magazines. Suffragettes were known as ‘not womanly rebels who threw down a challenge their God these roles of mothers and daughters’ . This article will be focusing on suffragette contribute to
On 19th May 1905, 10 women went to speak to the Prime Minister. One of
The suffragette movement was founded to represent a stepping stone for modernistic ideas, but by the end of the 1900s, militancy was in important manners self-defeating. Antifeminist and anti-suffragist arguments were typically based on women’s intellectual inferiority and poor emotional discipline. Those statements became much more difficult to refute in court, since the suffragettes were emphasizing on irrational, often dangerous behavior with prevailing acts of violence and destructions. When imprisoned for their law-breaking activities, many WSPU members went on hunger strikes and were subjects to prison force-feeding via throat-insertion of tubes. This disturbing procedure provoked a new campaign against forcible feeding and temporary
During the beginning of the 20th century, the increase activity of the National Union Of Women attractive additional support of the suffrage movement. “However, it was possible to criticize the policy and tactics of the constitutional suffragist on several grounds. It was argued that the suffragists should have revolted in 1884, when the amendment to the reform bill of that year failed through the opposition of the liberal leadership, but the suffragists were too well mannered to do more protesting and concentrate all of their efforts on one private members bill.” The women suffrage’s organization could not force the political parties to adopt the cause of women’s suffrage and need a major party to pick up their campaign or there was no hope of a government bill. Women’s suffrages leaders saw that they need more of a drastic tactics to gain public awareness. Women started protesting by undergoing violence methods and tactics however, the National Union Of Women believed that any aggression or violence acts of protesting would only weaken the movement. These actions would persuade male’s voters that women are too emotional and thus could not be trusted with the responsible of voting. These gentle ways of protesting was unconvincing, as many political believed would give up or lose interests. The lack of actions cause many women to take strongest methods of protesting their rights and formed a more violent group called Suffragettes.