For and Against Pacifism

  • Length: 778 words (2.2 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document

For and Against Pacifism

Pacifism subscribes to the idea of peace being the best goal and they
best means of achieving peace is always through peaceful methods. So
pacifists reject the use if physical force, even in the defence, and
maintain war is always wrong.

When it comes to pacifism there are arguments both for and against its
wide spread use. Arguments for include the teachings of Jesus, which
show that he taught about love our neighbours as ourselves and that we
should turn our cheek to violence against us. This is shown in Matthew
26:52 Jesus instructs Peter to drop his sword and not fight the Roman
guard and says 'all who live by the sword, will die by the sword.' And
again in Luke 6:7 where he instructed 'if someone strikes your cheek,
turn to him the other also.' These show Jesus was very much a pacifist
himself and as we are taught to follow Jesus example we should also
adopt pacifist views.

Another argument in favour of pacifism is that of the Hebrew idea of
Shalom. Shalom is a Hebrew word, which can be translated to mean
peace. However the idea behind shalom is much more than peace. It
embraces wholeness, a complete well-being, and a lively harmony. It is
about trust, openness, caring and justice. Shalom is a gift from God
and was brought to earth by Jesus.

Different Christian organisations have taken what the Bible teaches
about pacifism and interpreted it to be part of what their faith
teaches. For example Jehovah's witnesses refuse military service as a
matter if conscience, as their belief is that God demands pacifism
from them as his followers, regardless of any hostility they may face
or cost it may bring to them in other words their lives being taken.
They believe the state do not have the authority to go against God and
make anyone kill another human being. Then there is the Society of
Friends or the Quakers who believe under no circumstances must force
be used by armed forces, there should be no war weapons of any kind

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"For and Against Pacifism." 20 May 2018
Title Length Color Rating  
Just War and Pacifism Essay - The question "Can war be justified?" plagued mankind since the first war. The Just War Theory holds that war can be just. The theory has evolved for thousands of years and modern theorists, such as Michael Walzer, author of Just and Unjust Wars, puts forth criteria for a just war, such as jus ad bellum and jus in bello. Jus ad bellum includes reasons for going to war, and jus in bello deals with the people who wage war. The criteria in jus ad bellum include; just cause, declaration by a proper authority, right intention, a reasonable chance of success, the end proportional to the means, and war as a last resort....   [tags: War Pacifism Peace Essays]
:: 7 Works Cited
1886 words
(5.4 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Pacifism: An Alternative to Constant War Essay - Imagine for a moment a world without war and hatred; a peaceful union of people with a large spectrum of beliefs. Pacifism has proved largely successful for millions of individuals as well as several nations. Gandhi was the pre-eminent political and ideological leader during the Indian independence movement. He pioneered satyagraha. This is defined as resistance to tyranny through mass civil disobedience, a philosophy firmly founded upon ahmisa, or total nonviolence. This concept helped India gain independence and inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world....   [tags: Argumentative Essay] 1139 words
(3.3 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on The Teachings of Religion on War and Pacifism - The Teachings of Religion on War and Pacifism mples of the teaching against war given from the bible. Although Christians refuse to fight at war, they can still be part of war in a non-combat way (e.g. a medical aid to the injured of war.), or they might use non-violent methods as a different approach to war, e.g. a sile Pacifism is the refusal to use violence in any situation. Many Christians are pacifists, as they believe that God doesn't want them to fight their neighbours and the Bible tells them this....   [tags: Papers] 1570 words
(4.5 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on Pacifism & Conscientious Objection - During the 20th century America has been involved in many conflicts that have led to war or the taking up of arms against other humans and nations. Although the vast majority of Americans have blindly accepted these actions throughout the century, more and more people are seeing war as morally wrong. Reasons for this epiphany are based off of a variety of things and encompass many other aspects related to war and killing examples include: due to moral and ethical principles, objection to war due to strong religious beliefs, the objection to violence due to the same ideals above, objection to the government's use of force, and the objection to the use of weapons of mass destruction....   [tags: essays research papers fc]
:: 5 Works Cited
2869 words
(8.2 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on Pacifism - Pacifism is the belief that violence is not the way to resolve differences. They believe that war can be avoided and that there are better and longer lasting solutions to disputes. There are, however, various categories of ‘pacifist’. A ‘total pacifist’ is someone who completely avoids violence and believes it can never be justified, not even in self-defence or to protect others – this they see as the only morally correct view of war. A relative pacifist is someone who may use violence in certain situations but who supports disarmament....   [tags: essays research papers] 897 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay on Biblical Teachings to Support Pacifism - Biblical Teachings to Support Pacifism In the Bible, there are varied situations reflecting the teaching of war and peace, and Christians may have different views and opinions concerning the morality of war and whether the right to use violence can ever be justified. The Bible can be used to support many different views. People who hold the view that war can never be justified and recognise that there is evil in the world, but that evil cannot be overcome with the use of weapons which harm and kill are known as pacifists....   [tags: Free Essays] 369 words
(1.1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Liberty in Pacifism and The War by George Orwell and Lady Liberty by Delacroix - Attaining Liberty Liberty is one of if not the most highly desired things in this world today and in the past. In many countries people beg and fight for liberty but other places people have it given to them. Throughout history there have been examples of countries resulting to violence and warfare in order to attain the liberties they seek. The United States, in the Revolutionary War, fought for their liberties and their freedom, and the French during the French Revolution fought for theirs as well....   [tags: revolutionary war, battle, painting]
:: 1 Works Cited
1012 words
(2.9 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
The Just War Theory Described in Living Justice by Thomas Massaro Essay - The just war theory is described by Thomas Massaro in his book Living Justice as the “principle that warfare might be justified under certain conditions” (108). The complexities involved with international relations makes determining a just war very difficult. Even though historically pacifism hasn’t gained much traction within Catholic circles, it currently is gaining popularity with many mainstream Catholics. With so many differing views on military action, one might ask, “What determines a just war....   [tags: international relations, pacifism, catholicism]
:: 6 Works Cited
1398 words
(4 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
The Just War Theory Essay - ... For the actions of war to meet the Just War Theory requirements, a legal system that implements justice must initiate the call to action. These systems are in place enforce accountability among war parties, keeping in check the overall cost, validity, and probabilities of war. This requirement, while noble idealistically, relies on the assumption authority exists without corruption. A legitimate authority may endorse a war, but the intentions may conflict with other aspects of the Just War Theory....   [tags: pacifism, christianity, WWII, Iraq] 1705 words
(4.9 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Essay A. A. Milne's Life and Accomplishments - In 1910, “after reading Norman Angell's book The Great Illusion, Alan committed himself to pacifism, a cause that he served the rest of his life” (Wheeler). Even before this, Milne’s personality tended to lean in this direction; as exhibited in his childhood, a fundamental characteristic of Milne’s was his hatred of violence and aggression. He also had a strong sense of Puritanism, “partly natural, partly imposed by his Victorian upbringing” (Wheeler). These tendencies affected all of his writing, including the Pooh books, for many of his works carry light-hearted and innocent sense, but also an overwhelming sense of moral justice....   [tags: pooh books, pacifism, the great illusion]
:: 4 Works Cited
1711 words
(4.9 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]

and violence should never be met with violence. They say God has given
everybody an inner light to live by, and the inner light will help us
see the true reality of the situations we find ourselves in.

Finally properly the best arguments for the idea of pacifisms are
examples of when it has been used and has worked to chance an
injustice. There are two main examples of this Martin Luther King the
civil rights leader who in the fifties and sixties used peaceful
methods to gain full civil rights for American Negro. The second
example is that of the Hindu, Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi who through
peaceful methods fought to overcome British rule in India. Both these
men however did lose their life.

Arguments against it come from such people as Jeff McMahan, the Roman
Catholic Church and the just war theory.

Then there are the arguments against pacifism the first of these comes
from Jeff McMahan who insists that pacifism is difficult to maintain.
He believes this to be the case as it takes away the decision of a
victim whether a violent response is just. Pacifism expects a person
to stay non-violent in every situation. Which can be very difficult if
you are faced with violence against you. So another problem which
arises from this is that pacifism treats every situation as the same
whereas in fact situations are very different and unique.

The argument against pacifism put forward by the Roman Catholic
Church. They say that it is your duty to try and stop sin or wickness
if it arises using whatever means necessary to overcome it. And if
fail to do your duty and act against it you are indirectly promoting
it and this cannot be morally right.

The main argument against pacifism comes in the shape of the just war
theory which is a theory devised by Christians as to decide whether
war is justifiable or not. It sets out rules on how a war can be just.
These include war must be declared by legitimate authority, war is
only to be fought to confront a real and certain danger, war should
only be fought for the advancement of good or avoidance of evil, war
must be a last resort with all peaceful methods used to try and
resolve the problem first. The just war theory does have many things
in common with pacifism such as the fact it believes all peaceful
methods should be tried to avoid conflict first also in the way it
believes war is the last resort. So the main argument it puts against
pacifism is that there are occasions where all peaceful means of
trying to resolve the conflict have been exhausted and war is the only
way of over turning the evil so should be fought according to the rest
of the criteria put forward in the just war. Pacifism fails to
recognise the fact that peaceful methods will not always work and
gives no help in what to do if peaceful methods fail.

So in conclusion pacifism is a very good idea and if it could be put
in to total practice in a society, we would live in a much-improved
society. However for it to be able to exist you need a society where
every evil or conflict can overcome by using peaceful means. Seen, as
we don't live in a society like that it would be very difficult to
live by pacifisms principles, about the best means of achieving peace
is always through peaceful methods, making conflict inevitable as it
is the only way of dealing with many of the evils in today's society.
So as it has been said "to secure peace, is to prepare for war". Also
how realistic is it to be able to stay peaceful when you are faced
violence either against you or you property. I know if I found my self
in a situation where I was faced with violence I would feel that
meeting violence with violence was justifiable. So basically I
pacifism is a great idea but putting it into practice in the type of
society we live in today just wouldn't we are faced with to many evils
that wont be removed by peaceful means.

Return to