Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
literature accoding to vladimir nabokov
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: literature accoding to vladimir nabokov
The poem "Fame", by Vladimir Nabokov, seems to begin with the description or rather a search for the description of a character to be placed in one form of literary sat, whether poem or prose. The character's physical description is already formulated in the narrator's mind, "waxlike, lean-loined, with red nostrils soot-stuffed", but the narrator is struggling with the placement of the character, whether human, important, or "nothing special--just garrulous dust." The narrator continues with the description of the character while still unable to decide his standing. Deciding that the narrator is without fame in line 20, the narrator decides that only those of meek hearts can listen to his character's words. One can assume then that those of proud hearts choose not to adhere to this speaker because he holds no fame therefore to them, no words.
In wearing "illustrations of various substantial arguments" in the form of "a panama hat, a cap, a helmet a fez", comparative to "headgear in the sense of externalized thoughts, the created character's speech confuses the narrator himself, the creator This confusion is suggestively due to, the narrator's, intuitively Nabokov, lack of full understanding of the language in which the author is using; a lack of being aground in one language or culture, "I kept changing countries like counterfeit money."
The character's speech or diction is far from Nabokov's native language yet not fully the adulterer but a strange fusion of the two, understandable to none other than the speaker. Such lack of understanding thus leading to the forgotten writer, who, "hopelessly fading into exile", strives on with wasted pages of prose. No one will attempt to understand the rogue émigré writer who is only partially Russian now. In a poetic work, the one being read now, the writer, who is suggestively one and the same with the created character, will contemplate such matters as being forgotten and yet that too, the poem, will also be forgotten and read by no one.
Nabokov seems to be, as the narrator said before, contemplating the ideas of fame, of fame in his own country and yet when transferred from one literary country to another, only a translation, at times, or a fragment of your work is esteemed as it once was.
One can assume that the narrator then arises from his poem and comes back to it at a later period bearing knowledge that would have completely erased the first half of the poem if prior possessed.
In the end of the narrator’s consciousness, the tone of the poem shifted from a hopeless bleak
I transformed the poem by writing it as a story as though I am the
effects of both time past and time present on the final version of the poem. Like
Howard Nemerov was a very different type of poet than the rest of the poets during the time when this piece was written. Nemerov had himself been in the war, and come back home to a new country of consumerism and routine. When the 50’s ways of anti-communism and conservative thoughts were on the outs and the more liberal/revolutionary ways of thinking and acting came around, Nemerov did not follow the path of most of writers then. Most writers of the time thought of themselves as artist making a social stand, Nemerov was not very keen on protests or big on writing about social class values. He more or less stood back and wrote from a more sarcastic, paradoxical way. Being known as a “satirist filled with compassion,” Nemerov wrote on his observations and gave his opinion of them in the tone in which he wrote each piece (Labrie 145). This is quite evident in his poetry from around this time frame especially in the piece “Life Cycle of Common Man.”
The next part of the sets itself separately from the beginning of the poem, and allows the...
Tyutchev was one of the pioneers of Russian poetry, who showed the inner world of a woman, trying to support her side. The love poetry of Feodor Ivanovich is full of desire to understand the woman’s soul. He always highlights that the beloved of his persona is clearer, higher – she morally exceeds her beloved, because of her sufferings, which are greater, than his ones. Tyutchev idealizes woman, which makes her being a center of the best and the lightest in the World. On the other hand, Fet does not describe the entire feeling of love as Feodor Ivanovich does, instead, the love seems to decay into separate impressions, inner turmoil – the poet describes the exact moment of love. As it is illustrated by his poem ‘Whispers. Timid breathing. Trilling’, where the world of nature merges with the world of human’s feeling. Fet describes the feelings through the symbols of nature. What is more remarkable, is that the poem is written without any verb, which makes it very melodic and signing. Fet sees music, love and the nature are unique organic
Dostoevsky’s St. Petersburg is a large, uncaring city which fosters a western style of individualism. As Peter Lowe notes, “The city is crowded, but there is no communality in its crowds, no sense of being part of some greater ‘whole.’” Mrs. Raskolnikov initially notices a change in her son marked by his current state of desperate depression, but she fails to realize the full extent of these changes, even after he is convicted for the murder. The conditions and influences are also noticed by Raskolnikov’s mother who comments on the heat and the enclosed environment which is present throughout the city. When visiting Raskolnikov, she exclaims "I'm sure...
Tabloid culture is, in simple terms, gossip. Anna Hummel, a student of University of California, quoted Robin Dunbar; a published expert on gossip, in her short paper called ‘The Evolutionary significance of Gossip’. She says, ‘As humans, we take pride in our ability to think critically and express ourselves through art, music, religion, politics, and science. But in reality, most of these subjects are not discussed in the majority of human social discourse. About two-thirds of all human conversation is gossip (Dunbar 1996: 4); informal, trivial chatter, usually about the lives of other people’.
"To me he seemed like a trapped man, whose only wish was to be left alone, to the peace of his own art and to the tragic destiny to which he, like most of his countrymen, has been forced to resign himself." Nicholas Nabokov on meeting Shostakovich in 1949 in New York
will not fade from the memories of the population. The stories of Beowolf are a
For the reader to grasp the concept that this sonnet is about writer’s block Sidney has to cement the idea that Astrophil is a writer. In this duality, being both the star lover and writer, we begin to see Stella as a metaphor for a writer’s work and audience. Opening the sonnet with a profession of love for Stella, the object of Astrophil’s affection, he is hurt that he does not have her love. In the view of a passionate writer it is as if some critic has said that you are or your work is inadequate and without their approval. In order to gain the critics or Stella’s love he w...
Gurov is at the age of forty, he has a daughter at the age of twelve and also two other sons. By this time in most adults’ life they grow up. A man of this age most of the time is working on his career or focusing on his family. This is the complete opposite of Gurov. Gurov starts out in this short story as a lying, cheating, and heartless guy. When it was his time to marry he was very young and irresponsible about it, he marries a lady that he does not fall in love with. She will never truly make him happy. As a getaway from his unhappiness Gurov constantly cheats on his wife with various other girls. Not only does he cheat, but he feels nothing for these women. Gurov uses these women for the satisfaction to please his self and does not have any respect for women in general. Gurov refers to women as “the l...
Frank, Joseph. Through the Russian Prism: Essays on Literature and Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.
However, the poem remains intentionally ambiguous about the content of ideal writing. For example, instead of explicitly detailing the content of ideal writing, the poem uses ambiguous terms such as “great wits” and “nameless” to describe writing. “Great wits” is vague enough to apply to any piece of writing and instead provides an objective trait that writers should ideally possess. The mention of “nameless” solidifies the argument that the art does not have to be confined to a particular subject or type and instead can vary from work to work. Instead of creating rules to confine poets, the poem presents objective truths of what creates an ideal
In the second part of this essay expanding upon my reading of nineteenth century Russian authors, the short stories of Anton Chekhov, “The Lady with the White Dog” and the “Medical Case” will be compared. These two great authors’ whose stylistic qualities often create problems in interpretation for non-Russian speaking readers like me that I’ve thoroughly enjoyed.