In the case of Pomona County, Calif. Versus Keith Cook, the defendant was charged with murder after hitting and killing Jadine Russell a 55-year old mother of five. Mr. Cook's was driving under the influence of alcohol; his blood alcohol level was twice the state of California's legal limit.
This is how the story is known; Keith Cook had been enjoying himself at a party when he had an altercation with the party host. After Mr. Cook, made a flirtatious remark towards the party host's wife. The party host did not appreciate the manner in which Mr. Cook was behaving and he asked him to leave. Other party-goers offered Mr. Cook a ride, but he refused, got in his vehicle and headed home from the party. Meanwhile Jadine Russell, along with her daughter and two police officers were on the side of the road by Russell's disabled car. Keith Cook came up the hill driving over 70 miles per hour, in a 50 mile per hour zone, hit Jadine Russell's car and sent it into the four bystanders. The four victims never saw it coming. Jadine Russell was rushed to the hospital where she was pronounced dead a few hours after the accident. Mr. Cook did not dispute that his carelessness caused the accident and the death of Jadine Russell, but he and his attorneys say Mr. Cook is innocent of her murder. Cooks attorneys also argue that while doctors worked feverously to save Mrs. Russell's life, she refused the very treatment that could have helped her, a blood transfusion. Doctors testified that Mrs. Russell had a punctured spleen and that a blood transfusion could have saved her life. So why would Jadine Russell refuse the one measure that could have saved her life? She was a devout Jehovah witness, a religion that forbids members of having the blood of another person in their body. I'm not going to pretend that I understand exactly why they believe this, nor am I going to argue the correctness of this belief, but I digress. Doctors say Mrs. Russell refused blood at least 10 times and even pulled at the I.V. in her arm. When the doctors explained to her that her decision could be life threatening, she responded by saying, "If it's my time to go, it's my time to go."
It would be irresponsible not to note that after further investigation it was uncovered that Mr.
Understanding addiction is a complicated subject that inspires controversy and debate. Not only do people want to understand addiction because of the curiosity to understand human beings and human nature, but there are factors that go into the defining of addiction such as public policy and health care coverage. There are two theories that are on the opposite spectrum when it comes to addiction which include the “disease concept” and the “choice theory”. One defines addiction as a disease, something that is out of one’s control, while the other thinks of it as a choice or a moral deficiency that resides in a person. The consequence of this gap is the delay in gaining control over drug abuse. While the people who support the choice theory see
2. Facts: On July 2016, a group of six people, including Captain Eric Wilson, was in Fort Collins heavily drinking at a friend’s bachelor party. Captain Wilson broke into an SUV that he believed to be one of his friend’s, Mike. After waiting for Mike for some time, Captain Wilson decided to hot-wire the car and drive home. While driving home, Captain Wilson was intoxicated to the point of swerving and killing an innocent bicyclist. After getting out of the vehicle
Before reading the different articles on the “American Dream”, I did not know anything about the American Dream. But now I have a better understanding of it. We are living the American Dream. The American Dream is the ideal that every US citizen should have an equal opportunity to achieve success and prosperity through hard work, determination, and initiative. None of this applies to us because nothing is equal in America. The reasons why I believe that we are not living the American Dream in the 1960s is because we are still living with “Discrimination” according to the Mike Brown case. “Indifference” has a lot to do with the way the society is today. Finally, “Economic Indifference” is also evidence that we are not living
Kathleen Weiand shot and killed her husband Todd. At trial, Kathleen’s defense was BWS; because of Todd’s abuse, she had no choice but to kill him, fearing that if she did not, he would eventually kill her. Defense expert Dr. Len...
A man by the name of Challer D. Wadsley was charged with attempted murder, intimidation with a dangerous weapon, domestic abuse, false imprisonment and public intoxication due to the events that took place Monday morning on October second. In which Wadsley and his girlfriend, Courtney Opheim, engaged in an argument while in Opheim’s car that escalated to Wadsley holding a .20-gauge shotgun to her head and firing threats while she was in the process of driving. Which Opheim successfully managed to pull over and have Wadsley execute her car, yet lead to Wadsley firing rounds at her vehicle as she attempted to drive away. This ending in Wadsley’s arrest after the Palo Alto County Sheriff’s Department received several 911 calls of an
...iately discovered and the patient was fine, but had there been proper communication between the healthcare staff, such blunders could have been avoided altogether (Dolanksy, 2013).
“The Perils of Indifference” is a speech that Elie Wiesel delivered in Washington D.C. on April 12, 1999, exactly 54 years after his release from the Nazi concentration camp Buchenwald by American troops. Both Congress along with President Clinton and Mrs. Clinton were present to hear the speech. Wiesel spoke briefly about what it was like in the concentration camps, but he focused mostly on the topic of Indifference. His speech was effective in its use of rhetoric to convince the audience that as individuals and as a world culture we cannot afford to become indifferent to the suffering around us.
One flaw of the insanity plea is how the victims and their families are affected. For example on March 21, 2010, Kathy Powell, the mother of 21 year old Taylor Powell, who was brutally murdered by Jarrod Wyatt outside Klamath, Oregon, said the suspect's recent insanity plea was a complete lie. Mrs. Powell said she knows little about what happened that night, but voiced frustration about the defense's efforts to suggest her son somehow instigated the fight that led to his death. Wyatt, age 26, was being charged with murder, aggravated mayhem, and torture. He pleaded a dual plea of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity.
Having an abortion is a moral choice. The essay “A Moral Choice” by Mary Gordan discusses many issues concerning abortion, the author clearly favors pro-choice. The debate about when a fetus is alive (437) is a concern as to when it is acceptable to get an abortion. As well as the morality of abortion judged in the media, religion, society, and by self. The women who get abortions are critiqued as cold and technological (441). These normal everyday women have made this moral decision for centuries. Although society needs to be realistic our world is over populated and some women are not designed to have children. How do women make this moral decision?
Moral decisions can be difficult to make if it goes against your beliefs. You could choose to either follow your orders or follow your instincts. The stories “Gregory” by Panos Ioannides and “The Day of the Last Rock Fight” by Joseph Whitehill, both have endings that results in a negative outcome; both the protagonists are conflicted whether they should be loyal to their leader or friend, or follow their instincts. The soldier from “Gregory” is conflicted to whether he has to kill Gregory or not, and Ronnie is in a situation where he has to make a decision to whether he should have reported his best friend Peter or not. These protagonists are negatively affected from the decisions they make. In “Gregory”, the soldier regrets killing “Gregory”, and in “The Day of the Last Rock Fight”, Ronnie is heavily burdened after making the decision not to tell the detective of how Gene Hanlon dies. Furthermore, both the stories portray how it can be difficult making decisions when you know that your decision could have a great impact on the society and yourself.
Summary: “Wild to Mild” is about how cats became a thing. Before cats were tigers they were hunters at a point they help egyptian hunt for birds. They ate meat and their bodies build for power,speed, and stealth. The article was also about how people domesticated tigers into cats. Archaeologist found cats living near humans in Israel but they couldn’t tell if it was a wild cat or a pet. The ancient Egypt may have like cats because they ate pesky rats,mice,and snake. Some families shave their eyebrow if their cat die that how much they fell in love with cats. Some people like the Europeans believed cats were sent by devils but now cats are all over the place. Human learn to love
A case exists where a post-surgical patient was suffering from low bloody pressure. The nurse taking care of him noted this and asked the supervisor what to do. The supervisor asked her to contact the physician that was on call. The physician said to give the patient Albumin. The nurse on duty read in the patient’s chart that he had been given albumin, a product of blood. On reading also that the patient was a Jehovah Witness, she reported the case to the hospital CEO who gave the decision to inform the patient. The on-call physician resented the CEO’s involvement as he did not ...
When viewed from a strictly medical, psychological aspect, Andrea Yates medical history indicates that after the birth of her first child, she began to suffer from various forms of depression and suicide attempts. If one only examines the paper trail and doesn’t think beyond what the medical history does or does not indicate, then perhaps, Andrea would be innocent by reason of mental insanity as the 2006 acquittal suggest. However, when viewed form a legal aspect there are several inconstancies that challenge if this former nurse was insane or if she in fact premeditated the murder of her children as well as her acquittal.
Once I took care of a Jehovah’s Witness patient that had hemorrhaged after having a vaginal birth. She had an estimated blood loss of 1200ml. The patient’s hemoglobin results reflected a decrease from 8.0 hemoglobin level to a 6.7 hemoglobin level. The patient’s pulse was
As some believe that we humans have free will, they believe that we have the freedom of choice and the freedom of action. But, if all of our actions have a reason behind them, or if there is a causal explanation behind each of our choices, it is difficult to say that we actually have the freedom of will. For this reason, determinism challenges free will, as the determinist believes that all of our decisions are governed by some form of natural law, and that all of our behaviors are explainable by this law.