Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
louis riel traitor or hero
louis riel traitor or hero
louis riel traitor or hero
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: louis riel traitor or hero
There were many occasions in history wherein the French and English Canadians have clashed but the first major historical event to tear the relationship into pieces was the Northwest Rebellion. The French Canadians regarded the Northwest Rebellion a noble cause and Louis Riel a hero who stood up to protect the rights of the French-speaking Métis. The English saw the rebellion as a threat to Canada's sovereignty and Riel as a traitor. Louis Riel had taken up residence in the United States after the Red River Rebellion. A delegation traveled to Montana to enlist Riel's help once again to stop the Canadian government from encroaching on Métis land. Riel returned to Canada with the delegation and drew up a petition of grievances that had the support of both English and French speaking Métis as well as the immigrant settlers of the area. The petition was sent to the federal government calling for improved political representation, modification of the homesteading laws, and a land grant for the Métis among the seventeen items called for. Riel and his followers believed themselves to not being taken seriously by the Canadian government so he set up the first provisional government in the Northwest. Riel's earlier religious training was affecting his way of looking at his situation and he began fighting against the church and calling for war against the Canadian government. He proclaimed himself, "Prophet of the New World" and claimed his authority came directly from God (Stanley 302). Riel's provisional government was beginning to lose its original support and even the French-speaking Métis began to question his intentions. He hurriedly restored the unity with the treason trial of Charles Nolin and ... ... middle of paper ... ...e real problem was "French Canadians' unwillingness to accept the death penalty for a French-speaking Catholic" (Flanagan 84). The protests against Riel's execution were not confined to newspapers. In Quebec, thousands of people voiced their disapproval at rallies, the biggest one led by Honore Mercier. To protest Riel's execution, a new provincial party, the Parti National was formed in Quebec with Mercier as its leader. The newly formed party won the next provincial election beginning the decline of the conservative party. The controversy surrounding the trial and execution of Louis Riel has been debated throughout Canadian history with the French-speaking Canadians firmly planted against the English. Today, the government has recognized Riel as the legitimate leader of the Métis people. He is now regarded as a hero for representing the Métis.
...e to power in Quebec. This indicates that Quebecers supported non-violent methods in order to achieve independence for Quebec, rather than the violent methods of the FLQ, also indicating that the efforts of the FLQ would have been subdued by the Parti Quebecois. The death of Pierre Laporte was another unfortunate occurrence as a result of the War Measures Act which could have been avoided, yet some still believe his death is not related to the invocation of the War Measures Act. Justification is required for all actions which spark debate, and in events where the justification is provided under false pretences, someone must be held responsible. In this case it remains the Trudeau government. Trudeau may have had an admirable political career in which he made many wise decisions, however, the invocation of the War Measures Act in October 1970 was not one of them.
Louis Riel was a hero and a representative for the Metis people. His ultimate goals was to protect his people and try to obtain the same rights for his Metis people, which were given to the White English in Canada. He represented those who could not represent themselves. . Louis Riel and the Metis people demanded equal rights for each person, but time after time, the government refused to provide them with these rights. After the Rebellion Louis Riel was elected by Manitoba in the House of Commons. Riel went to Ottawa in an attempt to take his seat, but was not allowed because he was threatened that if he was near the house of commons he would be shot by many, I believe that this was the governments fault. The government had the ability to stop the threats, but chose
Was Louis Riel a hero or a traitor? Well, some individuals say that he was a hero, and others say that he was a traitor. Individually I believe that Louis Riel was a hero because he was the forefather of Manitoba, which is a province of Canada. The fact that he was a persuasive politician and spiritual leader made him a hero as well. Lastly, he stood up for Native rights. Others like the British had thought of him mostly as a traitor, because they were not able to understand that Louis Riel had just needed the Canadian government to treat his people fairly, and that he was willing to do everything for his people. Instead the government had thought that he was violent and evil, so a threat to them. Most people who had seen him as a traitor had realized that he did everything for his people…after his hanging.
Société historique de Saint-Boniface. (2010). The Death of Louis Riel. Centre du patrimoine. Information received from: http://shsb.mb.ca/en/node/1381
Since Canada was one country, the French- Canadians always disagreeing to help in all three of these wars did not show a lot of patriotism to the country. Especially during the time of the Boer War there was an outrageous reaction in Quebec against the English-speaking Canadians wanting to fight for their mother country Britain.
This change in mentality demonstrates how Riel is part of the living process of confederation. The unique relationship shared by Riel and the Canadian government also exists between Riel and the Métis. Previously, the Métis relied on Riel for his help in securing their rights and liberating them, going on to even ask him to go back to Canada during his exodus to Montana, in order to present a list of grievance to the Canadian government. This has changed today, where the province of Manitoba is self-reliant and the Métis people are able to garner support for their own causes. The changing situation of Riel’s treatment shows how as a result of the constantly changing process of confederation, we now treat him in a different way than we would have in the past. While Riel is a strong example of how confederation is very much a living process, Canadians and society today continues to influence Canada as much if not even more than the Founding Fathers did in the past. Even today, our feelings toward certain aspects of the government and confederation are still evolving and changing as we become more
rebellion the government sent 3,000 troops on the new railroad. Louis Riel leading different groups of First Nations fought the government and lost. Louis Riel was found guilty and hanged for his actions. It took 10 years of surveying to determine the best route across Canada. Many Chinese and surveyors lives were lost during the building of the railroad due to the dangerous work, bad weather and the lack of food. The Canadian Pacific Railroad is considered to be one of Canada's greatest feats of engineering. The railroad was finally built in 1885. When the last stake was hammered in the rail line in Vancouver, BC. The Canadian Pacific Railroad is a significant aspect of Canadian history.
Several factors and events, contributed to a metis identity, furthermore it hastened metis emergence and development. Metis identity was formed on the bases of common purposes, enemies and pride. The bison hunt, shared cultural practices, and military events cemented unity of the metis nation as one. The fur trade played a major role in the contribution of a metis identity, one which would become stronger as it developed. “We must cherish our inheritance. We must preserve our nationality for the youth of our future. The story should be written down to pass on.” (Louis Riel)
Throughout history, French-English relations have contained lots of cultural tension due to the discrimination and treatment that French Canadians have dealt with over the years. The minority group held grudges against the government since the conscription crisis of World War 1 in 1917 where French Canadians were forced to fight a war that many of them didn't want to participate in. Since then, the Federal government has been working towards appeasing the Québecois from the 1960s until the 2000s. Canada’s government had successfully responded to the rise of Québec separatism by addressing the appropriate political, cultural and social factors required to prevent the province from becoming sovereign.
government, t. p. (n.d.). Quebec Nationalism - Quebec History. Faculty.marianopolis.edu. Retrieved May 27, 2012, from http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/quebechistory/events/natpart4.htm
Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau’s vision of multiculturalism also energized fierce disagreement in Quebec given the
Louis Riel was one of the most controversial figures in Canadian history, and even to this day – more than a century after his execution – he continues to be remembered. Many believed him to be a villain; others saw him as a hero. So who was he really? Born in St. Boniface at the Red River Settlement of Canada (present-day Winnipeg, Manitoba) on October 22, 1844, Louis Riel hoped one day to follow his father’s footsteps and become a great Métis leader just like him. Eventually, Riel was seen as a hero to the French-speaking Métis. In the Canadian West, however, most people regarded him as a villain due to his execution in 1885. Nevertheless, Louis Riel was not really a villain by heart; only a flawed man who made many mistakes in his life. Today many more people are seeing him as a visionary, and recognizing the numerous contributions that he made to building Canada up as a nation. He was indubitably a Canadian hero, mainly due to his involvement with the Métis, confederating Manitoba with Canada, and approaching problems peacefully.
To decide what to do after Quebec separates, First Ministers and the ROC, must first look at why it happened. Perhaps Quebec's profound nationalism and unique national identity conflicted with citizens in the ROC; in order to gain understanding of their decision the ROC must look at Quebec's past. Quebec was not always treated fairly nor where they given many rights in regards t...
...in later years. Pontiac’s rebellion also caused Britain to be short of cash after having to pay for two consecutive battles. The British looked to the colonies for money without giving the colonies any say in the matter. This lead to the famous phrase, “no taxation without representation.” Another thing that happened during the French and Indian war was a much underpublicized meeting between the colonists. This was the first meeting the colonists ever had by their own accord. The meeting was called by Benjamin Franklin and was known as The Albany Plan of Union. Although the meeting got very little accomplished it still has to be considered a success because it showed that there were colonists willing to have independence. The over taxation and the fact the colonists got to see someone stand up to the British were the major events that lead to the American Revolution.
Quebec is a distinct society within Canada (Darkside). With its own civil code, language, and a single dominant faith (Roman Catholic), French Quebec is defiantly distinctive from the rest of Canada and many Quebecois are fighting to preserve that distinction (Darkside). Francophones of Quebec are fighting not only to preserve this distinction but also to be recognized as an entity separate from Canada with acknowledged cultural differences ranging not only from religion, but from ethnic roots which spread to linguistic differences as well. This desire to preserve their culture is what makes them a politically relevant example of a country pursuing nationalistic causes. We will explore the ethnic and linguistic traits and cultural events that inspire Quebecois nationalism.