Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss the impact of technology on warfare
Technological advancements in WWII
Technological advancements in WWII
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discuss the impact of technology on warfare
Warfare, has been used throughout the centuries by kings, emperors, and rulers to protect their land and more so their people. There are two types of warfare, one being that of traditional warfare which generally, consists of leaders using mass armies to conquer the opposing side, however, changes in technologies and weapons meant that leaders had to rethink the way in which they fought battles. The use of gunpowder weapons changed the way in which battles were fought dating back as early as the late 13th century with the introduction of the bronze-barrelled cannon (Rietbergen, 1998). Bacon argues that with the introduction of the new technology, the way in which the state observes the rest of the world has changed. That is, trade routes made it possible for the spread of gunpowder weapons that until the end of the 13th century was not possible (Rietbergen, 1998). Philosopher, Kenneth Waltz famous for writing The Spread of Nuclear Weapons in 1981, argued that wars exist in an anarchic domain as long as there is a lust for power between States. It is also argued that if States where to go to war it is because it feels that it is at risk of attack and needs to defend itself and it’s citizens (Waltz, 1998). Therefore, it is important to initially understand background into the causes of war and the development of traditional warfare into the transformation to modern warfare. The essay will then illustrate that it was not until the Starlin era that the need for change from traditional warfare to modern warfare was evident due to the changes in areas of technology and strategies (Snyder, 2008). Furthermore, the extent of the impact of the Cold War period signified that the use of traditional warfare would be inadequate as a nuclear d...
... middle of paper ...
... Social Catastrophe, Jonathan Cape, - London
Hough, O., 2006, Understand Global Security, Routledge, - New York
Kennedy, P., 1989, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, Fontana Press, - London
Powell, R., 2003, ‘Nuclear Deterrence Theory, Nuclear Proliferation, and National Missile Defence’, International Security, 27 (4), pp. 86-118
Rietbergen, P., 2006, Europe: A Cultural History, Anthony Rowe, - Wiltshire
Robertson, G., 2008, Crimes against Humanity, Penguin Books, - London
Rousseau, J., 1968, The Social Contract, Penguin Classics, - London
Snyder, C., 2008, Contemporary Security and Strategy, Palgrave Macmillan, - New York
Volkogonov, D., 1999, The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire, Harper Collins, - London
Waltz, K., 1981, ‘The spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May be Better’, Adelphi Papers, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 171, pp 1-30.
'Nuclear weapons protect our country. The very fact we have them means no-one will ever use them' In this account, I am going to discuss the diverse arguments which concern the issue of nuclear weapons, and whether or not their ownership actually voids use. Exploring both contrasting arguments, I will discuss both sides to the subject; arguments which support this statement contrast a great deal to those who rebut it, yet both sides have their valid reasons to their case; those who favour
The sole reason for Chinese nuclear force was to deter a nuclear attack on China. The development of U.S. missile defense systems, however, has compelled China to take an offensive reaction to this and began to advance its nuclear force. Now, there are two main reasons why a U.S. missile defense system would influenced China’s nuclear force modernization. First, a U.S. missile defense system undermines China’s nuclear minimum deterrence. Second, China continues to view the United States as its main
Since the deployment of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, the world has been threatened by nuclear weapons. Although there has not been a nuclear accident, the risk of having one is not impossible. Presently the world has enough nuclear warheads to wipe out all civilization. As technology advanced, more sophisticated and deadly nuclear weapons were built. More countries have nuclear capabilities than there were 50 years ago. As dangerous as nuclear weapons may seem, many have believed
China’s Nuclear Program Introduction China's nuclear weapons program has always been unique among the programs of the five official nuclear weapons states recognized by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. For a variety of economic, political, and cultural reasons, the Chinese program has had a very different trajectory of development, with different objectives, than those of the other major powers' nuclear weapons and missile programs. China's nuclear and ballistic missile programs
Libyan Chemical Weapons Proliferation Introduction A legacy of aggression exists between the United States and Libya which pervades every facet of U.S. foreign policy, particularly in the non-proliferation arena. The absolute distrust of Revolutionary Leader Colonel Mu'ammar Abu Minyar al-Qadhafi and his government expressed by U.S. officials has prompted the United States to play the role of policing non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons, the so-called weapons of mass destruction
Background In the face of uncertain developments in the Iranian nuclear program, there are two important aspects to be taken into consideration by the U.S. government. Firstly, there is substantial evidence that the Islamic Republic is on the verge of achieving break-out capability for creating a nuclear device. It is estimated that such a development could happen within the next six months. In the meantime, the election of a new, moderate President of the Islamic Republic H.E. Hassan Rouhani, whose
submarine force will celebrate the first century of service by highly skilled people in some of the most technologically advanced vessels ever built. The past 100 years have witnessed the evolution of a force that mastered submersible warfare, introduced nuclear propulsion to create the true submarine, and for decades patrolled the deep ocean front line; the hottest part of an otherwise Cold War. Submarines in War The U.S. Navy’s involvement with the submarine dates form 1888 when the Bureau of Construction
The dropping of the first atomic bomb marked a turning point in the way nations fight one another. The destructive nature of the atomic bomb changed the course of warfare forever. “The effectiveness of nuclear deterrence is best explained by the fact that it was based on fear unlike other peace-keeping strategies of the twentieth century.” This gradual shift to a “fear based” strategy was in response to the failures of previous peace keeping strategies earlier in the century during World War I and
similarities. Terrorists like drug traffickers, need weapons and engage in violence to achieve goals. Terrorists, like drug traffickers, are often involved in hiding and laundering sources of funds. Both terrorists and drug traffickers operate transnationally, and often get logistical and operational support from local ethnic satellite communities. Both groups often rely on the criminal community for support: they may need smuggled weapons, forged documents and safe houses to operate effectively
One such ‘democracy’ in need to protection was found in Korea. Prior to the detonation of atomic bombs over Japan, a meeting of allied command planned a land war against Japan. Russia, it was agreed, within three months of Victory in Europe day would move into Korea and prepare for attack. Russian forces would advance to north of the 38th parallel. American forces would meet them south of the 38th . From here the forces would coordinate an attack on Japan, however before this plan could be enacted
Loder, and Benjamin Sutherland. "Disharmony in the spheres." In Modern Warfare, Intelligence and Deterrence: The technologies that are transforming them, edited by Benjamin Sutherland, 101-102. London: Economist Newspaper Ltd., 2011. Miles, James, Anton La Guardia, Natasha Loder, and Benjamin Sutherland. "Space invaders: China admits shooting down a satellite." In Modern Warfare, Intelligence and Deterrence: The technologies that are transforming them, edited by Benjamin Sutherland, 101-102. London:
The Cold War, Latin America, and Cuban Pretensions as a Global Power Following the Cuban Revolution of 1959 and the Castro regime’s subsequent alliance with the Soviet Union, Cuba emerged to play a substantial global role in Cold War politics. Most famously, Cuba featured as the staging ground for the super power confrontation of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Moreover, throughout the Cold War, Cuba provided near constant support for revolutionary movements across the Latin American region. Finally
The truth will do away with a lot of silly ideas, a lot of completely wrong notions, which millions of people now believe about the atomic bomb. These ideas could easily cause great panic. And right now the possibility of panic is one of the best weapons any enemy could use against us." (Gerstell, How to Survive an Atomic Bomb 1) "Why should the bomb be approached with reverence? Reverence can be a paralyzing state of mind. For me the comic sense is the most eminently human reaction to the mysteries
bloody battles to arise and cause the fall of states. The rise of just institutions have helped kinship stay in certain parts of society over others. There are certain limits to kinship according to Robert Bates. Bates stresses the important of deterrence and that it can only work if revenge is seen credible. He says that as a family is getting wealthier, they fall prey to theft and arm themselves for protection. The readiness of a family or society to use violence is more a reason for it to rarely
Security Threats and Trade Barriers "As defence, however, is much more important than opulence..." In 1776, even as Adam Smith was championing the ideals of a free market economy, he recognized that the interests of national security far outweighed the principles of free trade. More then two centuries later, that sentiment proves to still be accurate and in use. Since the early 1900s, the United States has used this precept to defend its position on trade barriers to hostile nations, and