Vengeance and Dishonesty in The Crucible, by Arthur Miller

592 Words2 Pages

Each character has a certain failing that they represent in The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, more than anyone else. For Thomas Putnam his failing is how he would do anything to get vengeance on Francis Nurse. John Proctor failing is dishonesty to protect which undoubtedly cause his own down fall. Reverend Parris whose materialistic ways for money will end up with him having nothing. Putnam’s vengeance, Proctor’s dishonesty to protect, and Parris’ materialism all show a failing that will have consequences for someone in Salem.
In The Crucible vengeance is shown through Thomas Putnam because he is a wealthy land owning man high in the social class. Putnam did not like that Francis Nurse was rising in social status by gaining more land, and his wife’s brother-in-law, Bayley, who wanted to be come minister of Salem was stopped by the Nurse faction. When witchcraft was mentioned Putnam saw this as an opportunity to get his vengeance on Francis Nurse for hurting his family honor and rising up in power. He was going to get his vengeance on Francis through his wife Rebecca. “That the guidin...

Open Document