Maps

985 Words2 Pages

Ali Butt
44958
Project 1; Maps
19 march 2014

Project; Maps

Maps are seen to be people own perspective on the world and how they interpret them on maps. They are very individualistic, due to each person will draw their maps in regards to their own views on the world and places which are real significance to them. This view on mapmaking can be can be seen as prejudice and subjective as it tell about each person own view on how they see the world and tries to draw it on map and illustrated by the book the power of projection: How maps reflect global politics and history as “.Such projection may be manipulated to suit the cartographers agenda”(Klinghoffer,p.5).Moreover these individualist map when compared with maps by other cartographers, they are similarities and difference between the maps which will be illustrated and the reasons for these similarities and difference will be explained by using Map 1 and Map 2.
The similarities between map 1 and map 2 are both mapmakers study at AUS, love going to the same tea shop; visit the mall, go MMA (mixed martial arts training),to the movies, trying new places to eat ,new offer at existence places of eatery and going home. These similarities occur between both maps due to their projection which can be highlighted the power of projection: How maps reflect global politics and history as “Psychological projection provides the basis for geographical concepts as the interpreter establishes a vision from his own point of reference” (Klinghoffer, p.45). Subsequently the reasons for these similarities between the two maps as both cartographers are enrolled at the same university which is AUS. Also both like to have a cup of tea to unwind after the daily grind of universities life. Likewise both...

... middle of paper ...

...e instead of objective and when comparing any two maps you will find similarities and differences This can be beautifully summed up by the book the power of projection: How maps reflect global politics and history as “An expert at the library of congress maintains that such journalistic cartography demonstrated that maps could be active, dynamic, suggestive and demonstrative- clearly a far cry from scientific objectivity”(Klinghoffer,p39). And in historical context shows maps as subjective and difference between two maps as described in the book the power of projection: How maps reflect global politics and history as “Rather interesting is the story of a British map issued early in World War II. It indicated Soviet and German advances into Poland through the use of Arrows. When reprinted in China, only arrows of Soviet movements were included”(Klinghoffer,p.41-42).

Open Document