Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature of drug trafficking in USA
Drug trafficking in the us
Drug trafficking in the us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
United States versus Jones
514 Words2 Pages
Citation: United States v Jones/ United States courts of Appeals/ District of Columbia, 2012/132 S. Ct. 945 Facts: In 2004, the FBI initiated an investigation on Jones and other associates for a possible drug trafficking. During the investigation FBI agents obtained a warrant authorizing them to install a Global Positioning System tracking device on a Jeep, Jones used regularly. The warrant allowed agent to install the tracking device within 10th days of its issue but agents did not install the device until the 11th day. The GPS gave the FBI information regarding the Jeep’s and Jones every movement and based on the information provided agents determined that drug trafficking activity was present. Eventually it secured an indictment of jones and others for drug trafficking conspiracy charges, although the District court suppressed the GPS date obtained while the jeep was in Jones curtilage of the home they held that other date obtained outside in the public areas was admissible as jones had no reasonable expectation of privacy. The Distinct court reversed and held that admission of ev...
Related
Eeoc V. Consolidated Service System Summary
685 Words | 2 PagesEEOC v. Consolidated Service System, 989 F.2d 233 (Cir. 1993), as cited by Bennett-Alexander, D.D. and Hartman, L. P. (2014) at 195.
Florida versus Jardines
592 Words | 2 PagesFacts: On November 2006 the Miami-Dade police department received an anonymous tip that the home of Joelis Jardines was been used to grow marihuana. On December 2006 two detectives along with a trained drug sniffing dog approached Jardines home. At the front door the dog signaled for drugs, as well as the detective who smelled the marihuana coming from inside. Detectives then wrote an affidavit and obtained a search warrant that confirmed the growth of marihuana in Jardine’s home. Jardines was then charged for drug trafficking. Jardines then tried to suppress all evidence and say that in theory during the drug sniffing dog was an illegal search under the 4th amendment. The trial courts then ruled to suppress all evidence, the state appellate courts then appealed and reversed, the standing concluding that there was no illegal search and the dog’s presence did not require a warrant. The Florida supreme court then reverse the appellate court’s decision and concluded that a dog sniffing a home for investigativ...
The Case Of The US V. Jones Case Is Judicial Review?
1110 Words | 3 Pages... consent to the installation, this action should be considered as a “trespass” (Supreme 7). Dreeben has a weak following statement saying that it could be counted as a “technical trespass” but that would then make U.S. v. Karo a technical trespass (Supreme 7). Here, Dreeben illustrates the “but he did it too” tactic that younger kids use when they are questioned after getting in trouble. Kids say this when they really do not know what to say or how to justify their actions. Dreeben realizes that this would be considered as a trespass which would then mean that it was a violation of the Fourth Amendment. However, he tried to revert to the method of putting the blame of someone else because he struggled at justifying an opposing view towards Jones during this time. The court moves on from the trespassing issue to the topic of warrants for the GPS (Supreme 17).
United States vs Martha Stewart
1199 Words | 3 PagesMartha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic were indicted on criminal charges arising from Martha Stewarts December 27, 2001 sale of 3,928 shares of stock in ImClone Systems, Inc. ("ImClone"). ImClone is a biotechnology company whose then-chief executive officer, Samuel Waksal, was a friend of Stewart's and a client of Stewart's stockbroker at Merrill Lynch, defendant Peter Bacanovic. On December 25, 2001, ImClone learned that the Food and Drug Administration had rejected the company's application for approval of Erbitux, a cancer-fighting drug. On December 28, the day after Stewart sold her shares; ImClone publicly announced that the Erbitux application had been rejected. Shortly after ImClone's announcement, the Securities and Exchange Commission "SEC" and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York launched investigations into trading in ImClone stock in advance of the announcement to the public of the news about Erbitux.
The President Needs the Line-item Veto
3295 Words | 7 Pagesal., Appellants v. City of New York et al. Supreme Court of the United States. U.S. 1998. Web. 6 May 2014.
American Civil Liberties: Do Americans Have Enough Protections for Civil Liberties, or Not?
1449 Words | 3 PagesWagner, F. D. (2010). McDonald et al. v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.. Supreme Court of the United States, 1, 1-214. Retrieved May 4, 2014, from http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1521.pdf
Section 7 of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
1891 Words | 4 PagesMelvin, Justice. "In The Supreme Court Of British Columbia." Issues In Law & Medicine 9.3 (1993): 309. Academic Search Complete. Web. 16 Nov. 2013.
Flag-Burning is No Crime
1153 Words | 3 Pages(B) "Texas v. Johnson Certiorari To The Court Of Criminal Appeals Of Texas." Blacula. (1989): 20pp. Online. Internet. 16 Nov. 1999.
The Judicial Process and Batson Case
2726 Words | 6 PagesStewart, David (1986) “Court rules against jury selection based on race” ABA Journal, July 1: 72 ABAJ 68.
4th Amendment Violations
1605 Words | 4 Pages...hed the car in places where contraband would not normally be found, but it had no relation to the discovery of the cocaine. The weapons found at the ranch are admissible due to the fact the agents had a warrant to search the ranch for drugs and weapons. The Lamborghini is not admissible due to the fact it was not covered by the warrant and the VID# was not in plain sight of the Agent doing the search. The statement made about trying to find Snow White would not be admissible in court because Agent Smith arrested Doe and started asking him questions about Doe's crime before Doe was read his Miranda Rights. Lastly, the statement Doe made about his supplier would be admissible in court because Doe was read his Miranda Rights and acknowledged his understanding of the rights and made a voluntary confession afterwards with no coercion on the part of the Agents involved.
Is Flag Burning Protected by the First Amendment?
2205 Words | 5 PagesO' Connor, Sandra D. "Boos v. Barry." 22 March 1988. World Wide Web. 3 March 2001.
Mapp v. Ohio
569 Words | 2 PagesThree police officers were looking for a bombing suspect at Miss Mapp’s residence they asked her if they could search her house she refused to allow them. Miss Mapp said that they would need a search to enter her house so they left to go retrieve one. The three police officers returned three hours later with a paper that they said was a search warrant and forced their way into her house. During the search they found obscene materials that they could use to arrest her for having in her home. The items were found in the basement during an illegal search and seizure conducted in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and therefore should not admissible in court.
Loving v. Virginia (388 U.S. 1)
2066 Words | 5 PagesHall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Forensic Evidence Admissibility For or Against in the Bloodsworth v. State Case
1944 Words | 4 PagesBLOODSWORTH v. STATE, 76 Md. App. 23 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland July 8, 1988).
More about United States versus Jones
Eeoc V. Consolidated Service System Summary
685 Words | 2 PagesFlorida versus Jardines
592 Words | 2 PagesThe Case Of The US V. Jones Case Is Judicial Review?
1110 Words | 3 PagesUnited States vs Martha Stewart
1199 Words | 3 PagesThe President Needs the Line-item Veto
3295 Words | 7 PagesAmerican Civil Liberties: Do Americans Have Enough Protections for Civil Liberties, or Not?
1449 Words | 3 PagesSection 7 of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
1891 Words | 4 PagesFlag-Burning is No Crime
1153 Words | 3 PagesThe Judicial Process and Batson Case
2726 Words | 6 Pages4th Amendment Violations
1605 Words | 4 PagesIs Flag Burning Protected by the First Amendment?
2205 Words | 5 PagesMapp v. Ohio
569 Words | 2 PagesLoving v. Virginia (388 U.S. 1)
2066 Words | 5 PagesForensic Evidence Admissibility For or Against in the Bloodsworth v. State Case
1944 Words | 4 PagesSociological Analysis of Divorce
1157 Words | 3 Pages