Unilever's Path to Growth Strategy: Is it Working
1. What are the chief elements of Unilever’s diversification strategy? Is Unilever pursuing a multicountry or a global strategy? What aspects of the strategy do you like? What aspects of the strategy are you skeptical about and why?
2. Did Unilever pay too much to acquire SlimFast? Is there any reason to believe that SlimFast might be a better performer as part of Unilever than it would be a standalone enterprise? Explain. Is SlimFast a good strategic fit, given that there are no other important diet products in Unilever’s product/brand portfolio?
3. What is going on at SlimFast in 2003? Why are sales nose-diving? What can be done to get things turned around? Should the SlimFast business be sold? Was the acquisition a mistake? Why did things look so good at the time of the acquisition and so dismal now?
4. Did Unilever pay too much to acquire Ben & Jerry’s? Is there any reason to believe that Ben & Jerry’s might be a better performer as part of Unilever than it would be a standalone enterprise? What problems will Unilever be likely to encounter with its Ben & Jerry’s acquisition?
5. Did Unilever pay too much to acquire Best Foods? Why or why not? What is your assessment of Best Foods’ recent performance and business portfolio? Is Best Foods a good strategic fit?
6. What is your assessment of the caliber of Unilever’s lineup of businesses and brands as of late 2003? Did the acquisitions of SlimFast, Ben & Jerry’s, and Bestfoods enhance Unilever’s portfolio? Why or why not?
7. How does Unilever’s product/brand portfolio stack up against those of its chief competitors?
8. What issues does Unilever management need to be concerned about? What problems do you see as of late 2003?
Senior Management of PepsiCo is evaluating the potential acquisition of two companies – Carts of Colorado and California Pizza Kitchen – in order to expand the company’s restaurant business. If indeed PepsiCo decides to pursue the acquisition of one or both, they must decide how to align each of these business units in its historically decentralized management approach and how to forge relationships between the acquired business units and existing business units. In their evaluation, Senior Management is faced with the question of whether the necessary capital investment in order to purchase one or both of the businesses can be profitable for each of the acquired business units, but must also take into consideration that the additional business units will not hinder the profitability of the existing business units.
Although Lafley has had success, the underlying problem remains. How will Lafley return P&G to its rightful place in Corporate America? P&G's solution to its problems is through product line extensions, expansion into non-premium brands, as well as acquisitions, licensing, reinforcing market orientation through consumer focus, and outsourcing. This recommendation was based on following items;
• Assessing the external threats that affect the McDonald’s Corporation and the opportunities that are available to the corporation. Providing my opinions on how this corporation should deal with the most serious threat and greatest opportunity.
Upon review, Ben & Jerry’s Homemade should approve the offer from Unilever for $36.00 (cash) per share. In reviewing the offers two questions were presented. The two questions included: the social mission of Ben & Jerry’s surviving a takeover, and maintaining the best interests of the shareholders. To follow, will be the justification for the Unilever offer, alternative offers, and the risks that are involved with a possible takeover.
BR was sold to Delta Foods in 1996 for US $2 billion. At this time, it was one of the largest fast-food chains in the world generating sales of US $6.8 billion. DF purchase of BR brought in a new cultural paradigm. DF is an individualistic, aggressive growth company with brands they believe are strong enough to support entry into new overseas markets without the need for local partnership. The DF strategy is one of direct acquisition and JV’s were not part of their strong suit. DF strategic implementation is based on hiring local managers directly or transferring seasoned managers from their soft drink and snack food divisions. The DF disdain for JVs is clearly reflected by their participation in only those JVs where local partnering was mandatory (e.g. China) to overcome regulatory barriers to entry. JVs had been the predominant strategy for BR which was unlike the DF outlook. Terralumen’s strategy was misaligned and out of sync with the DF strategy. This was unlike the complementarity that existed with BR’s strategy. This misalignment began to affect the JV relationship that had worked well with BR in the initial years. The failure of Terralumen and DF to recognize this fundamental cultural difference between their operational strategy styles i.e. Individualistic and Collectivism leads to their inability to proactively create steps for better alignment in the early period after acquisition, creating uncertainties and difficulties for both corporations. There is a lack of communication and virtually absence of trust between two new partners. DF appeared to be flexing its muscles in the relationship and using a more masculine approach compared to Terralumen’s more feminine approach. Both the corporations are strategically involved in a complex situation where they appear reluctant to address the issues at stake and move ahead together. The DF strategy of
This case examines issues of asset control for Ben & Jerry’s Homemade, Inc., in light of the outstanding takeover offers by Chartwell Investments, Dreyer‘s Grand, Unilever, and Meadowbrook Lane Capital in January 2000.
Kraft Food Group has some areas in which it can grow. The company needs to fix its debt-to-assets and debt-to-equity ratios. The profit margin has been sporadic for the last five years. This is not a good trend for the company. This industry has some very external factors that can devastate the profit margin such as drought and other Asian market trends that can hurt the bottom line for this industry and company. Weather cannot be controlled. This company has a lot of different products which can be good by not putting all of your eggs in one basket approach. This can also lead the company to be stretched and pulled into many directions. The food industry can be a very up and down market because of external forces. Kraft Food Group has some problems with putting chemicals in some of their products that are now prohibited by the government. Kraft Food Group has food scientists, engineers and chemists to combat these chemicals and to develop new products and provide consistent quality of products so they can grow through sales and profits. Kraft Food Group has a high standard of quality and respect from its customers. Kraft Food Group could lose financially by food contamination. This company will continue to grow in the future if they continue to make improvements, make investments, and produce quality
Question 3: It’s clear that, in general, the company’s growth initiatives were sound in terms of generating the growth expected by Wall Street. But which of Starbucks’ initiatives, in retrospect, were sound decisions for the brand and which were inconsistent with brand
As there is a lot of company in the Fast Food Industry, the information below will be only stated the size of the top ten company that is successful in this industry. These ten...
Starbucks case study: background 1971-87; private company 1987-92. (1997). McGraw-Hill Companies. Retrieved March 20, 2007, from the McGraw-Hill Companies website: http://www.mhhe.com/business/management/thompson/11e/case/starbucks-1.html
Therefore, I think the next strategy for future global growth, should be more focus on healthy and organic food option. In addition, the company should use strong marketing tools, from menu boards to national television advertising campaigns, to help customers understand the nutritional choices
Marketing and Sales: Annually, Unilever spends around 7 billion euros in marketing and sales. The reason to do so is to promote customer loyalty and relationships, brand equality and creates competitiveness of brand.
The main symptom and concern is that Scotts’ European sales had increased as expected, but margins had dropped, as well as synergies between the acquired companies were not working as expected. In addition, one of Scotts Europe’s largest customers was threatening to leave due to unacceptable service levels that might cause a domino effect to other large customers.
Question 1: Critically analyze the growth strategy adopted by the Aditya Birla Group. What are your views on the business portfolio adopted by the group? (7 marks)
2. Why do you think Wal-Mart has had a recent number of ethical issues that have been in the news almost constantly?