Ultrasonic Condition Monitoring Technique and Microstructure

1249 Words3 Pages

In Conventional ultrasonic non-destructive condition monitoring the testing personnel utilize his testing experience to interpret defects while analyzing the ultrasonic echo. Due to the coarse material structure, the ultrasonic wave attenuate more so sometimes it gives false impression of defect and provides unreliable results. The conventional inspection method is too subjective and highly relies on the effectiveness of testing personnel so the inspection reliability is low. To overcome these limitations a multi-interrogation ultrasonic technique and correlation of several parameters such as attenuation, acoustic velocity and grain size with material features is suggested in this paper.
1 Introduction

Non Destructive Testing (NDT) is the testing of materials, for surface or internal flaws or metallurgical condition, without rendering it unfit for service.
There are various NDT methods of inspecting the internal defects of complex surface parts, e.g. radiograph, eddy flow, ultrasonics, etc. Amongst these testing techniques, ultrasonic testing has an important role due to its strong penetration, good direction, high sensitivity, overall comparative low cost, and being harmless to the human body and the material of the parts.
Ultrasonic [1, 2, 3, 4] is a highly effective non destructive condition monitoring method which can detect even incipient faults. So Mean Time between Failure (MTBF) increases due to proactiveness and reduce Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) by improving trouble shooting capabilities. Ultrasonic nondestructive testing methods [5] play an important role in the physical characterization of engineering materials and in the assessment of their quality and serviceability in structures. In a wide range of different NDT me...

... middle of paper ...

...s, NDT and E International (2008).
[10]. Bohren Craig F., Huffman Donald R.: Absorption and scattering of light by small particles, Wiley, 2007.
[11]. Lavender J. D.: Ultrasonic Testing of Steel Castings, Steel Castings Research and Trade Association, England, 1976.
[12]. Napolitano R.E.: Measurement of ASTM Grain Size Number, Material science and engineering, Lowa State University.
[13]. Hyun Lee Joon: Nondestructive Characterization of Metal Matrix Composite by Ultrasonic Measurement, Peragmon (1995).
[14].http://www.ndted.org/EducationResources/ CommunityCollege/Ultrasonics/Physics/attenuation.htm. Community College, n.d. Online.
[15]. Anson L. W., Chivers R. C. and Puttick. E.: On the Feasibility of Detecting Pre-Cracking Fatigue Damage in Metal-Matrix Composites by Ultrasonic Techniques, Elsevier Science Limited: Composites Science and Technology (1995).

More about Ultrasonic Condition Monitoring Technique and Microstructure

Open Document