Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
nora's struggle in a dolls house
nora's struggle in a dolls house
nora's struggle in a dolls house
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: nora's struggle in a dolls house
Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House seems to convey the idea that real love can only exist between equals. There is much talk of love in A Doll's House however; Ibsen doesn’t show this real love till the end; we are presented throughout the play different forms of love: familial, maternal, paternal, and fraternal during act one and two of the play. A Doll’s House was a very controversial play during its time, it portraits the values of the rigid Victorian way of life that dominated Western Europe at the time. The characters had specific roles and social functions assigned to them. A woman was always seen as a property to men in every way, and she had a duty to her husband that was higher than the duty to herself. My would say true love is when you …show more content…
His thoughts and movements are her thoughts and movements. Torvalds love for Nora is more physically than emotionally. He feels that it is Nora duties to physically provide for her husband and financially. Nora would perform immature acts such as prancing around and calling herself his sparrow or little squirrel in which Torvald would credit her with money. Torvald says to Nora after a request of money, “you can’t deny it, my dear little Nora, she’s sweet little spendthrift, but she uses up a lot of money. One would hardly believe how expensive such little creature are” (884). Torvalds shows that how their relationship is built out of the necessity of money which both most desire than they do each other. However, he worries that she will waste it on candy, pastry or something else of Childish and useless value. Nora's duties, in general, are restricted to caring for the children, doing housework, and working on her needlepoint. When a relationship is being control by one person like Torvald is to Nora; they would go to great lengths to keep that authority. Nora cries out to Torvald, "Your squirrel would run about and do all her tricks if you would be nice, and do as she wants” (909). Nora was belittling by Torvald when she as his wife do not have to little herself just to be herd by her husband. But overall, Nora's most important responsibility is to please Torvald. …show more content…
Love is a powerful emotion that can only be held by those who can share more than wealth but can count that the other would give up everything even their appearance to be with them. The opposite love that Krogstad and Mrs. Linde had was that Krogstad gave up his opportunity to regain his position in society to tie the knot with Mrs. Linde. A Doll’s House was a play to show that many women everywhere were force into a marriage that one person took full control of the other person. People are the carriers and doers of love and when they miss use it for a hurtful outcome torts the other person it builds an incarceration to the
As a result of Henrik Ibsen’s controversial play, A Doll’s House, published in 1879, many critics were outraged that Ibsen’s conclusion challenged gender roles within society. Due to certain exterior pressures, where men were in fear that their “traditional” male dominant marriages were being threatened, Ibsen drafted an alternative ending to appease their concerns. However, his original ending shed light on the idea of a woman becoming self-sufficient in a nineteenth century society. In Ibsen’s well-crafted play, the protagonist, Nora Helmer, is treated inferior in the eyes of her husband, Torvald. Ibsen depicts how gender inequalities amongst the two spouse’s incurred detrimental consequences
Kennedy, X.J. and Dana Gioia, eds. Backpack Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. 4th ed. NewJersey: Pearson, 2012. Print.
“A Doll’s House” was written by Ibsen not only to bring attention to the suppression of women, but to bring attention to the other problematic aspects of marriage in the late 1800’s. Since the play was first performed in 1879 in Copenhagen, there was debate about the way that Ibsen portrayed the nature of the Helmer’s marriage (McFarland-Wilson, Knapp 140). Throughout the entire Western World in the 20th Century, the position of not only women, but the nature of marriage was up in the air. Ibsen was not a feminist; he was a realist, who loved to point out the injustices in society (Kashdan). Ibsen’s character clearly explains why he chose to center his writing on the overall picture of marriage, not just the neglect and unfair treatment that the women received.
Walker, Alice. “Everyday Use.” Backpack Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. 4th ed. Ed. X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. Boston: Pearson, 2006. 69-76. Print.
Kennedy, X.J., and Dana Gioia. Backpack Literature. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson, 2012. 762-875. Print.
Upon reading “A Doll’s House” by Henrik Ibsen, many readers may find the character Nora to be a rather frivolous spending mother of three who is more concerned about putting up a front to make others think her life is perfect, rather than finding herself. At the beginning of the play, this may be true, but as the play unfolds, you see that Nora is not only trying to pay off a secret debt, but also a woman who is merely acting as her husbands “doll” fulfilling whatever he so asks of her. Nora is not only an independent woman who took a risk, but also a woman whose marriage was more along the lines of a father-child relationship.
Lee, Edward Bok El Santo Americano. Backpack Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing 4th Ed.
Kennedy, X. J., and Dana Gioia. Backpack literature: An introduction to fiction, poetry, drama, and writing. Pearson.
Kennedy, X. J., and Dana Gioia. Backpack Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, 2012. Print.
Unlike Robert Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love, Fromm’s theory is derived from a humanistic approach explained through five different types of love: motherly love (one-sided and unequal), brotherly love (loving all), erotic love (intimate but short lived), immature love (overwhelming), and mature love (mutual and caring). Motherly love is a one-sided and unequal or unconditional love commonly given by mother to her younger child which gives the child a sense of stability and security . Brotherly love is a type of love where an individual loves all. Opposite of brotherly love is erotic love which the individual focuses on loving one individual in a sexual way, this is short-lived. This type of love is comparable to the passion, intense romantic or sexual desire that is accompanied by physiological arousal in Sternberg’s theory of love. Immature love is when receiving love or taking love overwhelms the giving of love. Lastly, mature love, is described as love in which both partners share mutual care and responsibility for each other and both individuals are able to love each other freely. Mature love is achieved when both individual’s personalities are capable of giving true, genuine love (Friedman & Schustack, 2013). Mature love is also comparable to consummate love (Myers, 2013) in Sternberg’s theory of love. Fromm’s theory of love does not just emphasize
According to Henrik Ibsen, the institution of marriage was secure. Women did not even have the thought of leaving their husbands and the roles within the marriage were clearly defined. In the play, A Doll’s House, it questions certain perspectives as it relates to traditional attitudes, which is highly debatable and provokes intense criticism. Furthermore, in order to fully explain, one must understand characterization, theme, and the use of symbols throughout the play.
Kennedy, X. J., and Dana Gioia. Backpack literature: an introduction to fiction, poetry, drama, and writing. Fourth ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2011. Print.
In Henrik Ibsen's "A Doll's House", the subject most important to the story is marriage. "Until death do us part" well, not always. Everywhere one looks, divorce is plaguing society. The treasured marriage vows have become nothing but a promise made to be broken. A Doll's House is a prime example of a relationship that didn't work. To keep a marriage alive and well it must hold onto certain qualities: love, communication, trust and loyalty. With these qualities, any marriage is bound to work.
Marriage is a union between two people who communicate and love each other. A love so pure and unconditional that only in death can they part. In a Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen, Nora and Torvald appear to portray the perfect marriage. However, throughout the play flaws within the Helmer marriage are exposed: a lack of communication, love and selflessness. A relationship based on lies and play-acting; A marriage condemned by the weight of public opinion.
A Doll’s House, written by Henrik Ibsen, is attempting to pursue the message that a true happy marriage is a marriage of equal parts between both people. In the beginning of the play, both the Helmers seem happy to be together. Over the course of A Doll’s House, the imbalance and unhappiness of the relationship become more obvious (Shmoop). By the end of the play, Nora Helmer, the wife of Torvald Helmer wants to focus on just herself and realizes that she was never actually in love with her husband, Torvald. Torvald, the husband, is completely blindsided by everything that Nora is feeling and is heartbroken when she leaves him. By the end of the play, the marriage between the Helmers ends.