Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Japanese society and culture
Myths of Japanese culture and traditions
Japanese society and culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Japanese society and culture
Toyota's HRM practices in the UK Abstract This report examines Toyota's HRM practices in Japan and looks at how changes were made when setting up the European plant in the UK. Toyota were faced by the pressure to remain internationally consistent with their HRM practices, which include, employee commitment, employee integration with the organization, flexibility and adaptability and lastly quality. However there were local cultural forces which also needed to be taken into account. Introduction The HRM strategy in Japanese companies is supported by the six pillars of Japanese employment practice lifetime employment, company welfare, quality consciousness, enterprise unions, consensus management and seniority-based reward systems. Toyota is at the heart of global manufacturing, a company that has grown over 70 years to become the world's third largest vehicle manufacturer. (Toyota worldwide 2006) Toyota is the seventh largest company in the world and the third largest manufacturer of automobiles, with production facilities in 26 nations around the world employing more than a quarter of a million people. The decision to manufacture in Europe was based on a corporate policy of building vehicles where the customers are and The United Kingdom was chosen for many reasons including its history of vehicle manufacture, the large domestic automobile market, its components supply base and its excellent links with the rest of Europe. The vehicle manufacturing plant is located at Burnaston in Derbyshire, the engine manufacturing plant is located at Deeside in North Wales.(Toyota Manufacturing UK 2006 ) the company has, since production began in 1992, grown to its current size with 5,500 members are employed. As ... ... middle of paper ... ...ions, consensus management and seniority-based reward systems all suitably adapted to the local context, of course, this would force the adoption of Japanese practices such as Kanban(JIT) and Kaizen (continuous improvement), that call for flexible utilization of resourceful humans. Legge, (2004) Toyota was forced into adapting its strategies to different marketplaces as well as altering its management style. For example in Toyota UK the organisational structure corresponds to the traditional Toyota system which encourages team working and communication between workers this was done through training, sharing of information and knowledge between teams and team members. The fact that Toyota dealt with trade unions, shows departure from traditional Japanese organisational behaviour represented innovative adaptations on the part of the company to operating in the UK.
Taiichi Ohno was born in China and grew up in Japan during a very turbulent time. Born a few years after the Russo-Japanese War and two years before the First World War, his leadership helped Toyota become a world leading car manufacturer at a time when Asian brands had difficulty competing against European and American manufacturers (Grips, 2006). To make matters worse for Toyota and other Japanese companies, Japan had been severely bombed during World War II. This left Japan’s industry and workforce weakened and uncompetitive. In addition, as one of the losing axis countries, Japan had lost territory to the Soviet Union and China and was forced to pay billions of Yen (¥) in damages to the victor nations, including the United States and the Philippines (Washington Post, 2014). Although the United States initially helped Japan financially in order to keep them out of the Soviet Union’s sphere of influence, ultimately, Japan was responsible for its own reconstruction and reindustrialization.
As stated before Japan has a strong team value system. And also they have a professional order in their businesses. Corporate position is a very strong aspect of Japanese organization also. Executives are spoken to by title and not name (Anderson School UCLA, http, 1999). Primary to Japanese business is the concept of actual status in society (Anderson School UCLA, http, 1999). Several aspects of status can be a hinder or help to progressing in Japan. Persons in Japanese corporations who are lower on the scale respect higher officers based on exact position within the company (Anderson School UCLA, http, 1999).
As a whole, human resources has undergone an enormous transformation in the United Kingdom and the United States (Popescu, 2016). It no longer plays an administrative role, it is now a strategic partner in any organization. The United States are leading the pack on global human resources and now other countries, such as Japan, are jumping on the
The main issue in case study 4-7 focuses on what the Japan company Nippon Cash Machines and their recent US merger National Office Machines should do to their Japanese sales force who has always followed a salary based payment plan and lifetime job security because they are quickly loosing market share in a highly competitive market. Therefore, the main statement for the case is as follows:
This case depicts about the success stories of the collaboration in the automobile industry by the Japanese and US firm though they were obviously competitors. One significant success story emerging from the alliance involves Ford probe and Mazda MX-6. There were swapping of resources and capabilities between the two firms. Mazda designers design the basic platform, engine and drive train for the cars. Mazda then design the outside of the MX-6 and Ford does same for the probe. Finally both cars are assembled at a factory owned by the two firms. Ford escort was another successful offspring of the alliance where again the Mazda engineers designed the car and Ford made it. But the alliance was not without spots. Mazda Navaho one of the offspring of the alliance which was basically build upon the on of the Ford popular product Ford explorer and build by the Ford makers. Ford made an opposite step by denying to provide the Japanese partners Navaho production to continue production of its own product line. The partner Mazda in addition fell into financial distress and Ford got the effective management control of Mazda and took some bold steps which eventually went against the collaboration.
For over fifty years, Toyota has established over 50 bases in 26 different countries and regions. Their automobiles have found their way into over 170 countries across the entire globe. In addition, Toyota has design and R&D bases in nine locations overseas, with this they prove that they have achieved consistent globalization as well as localization. The most important part in any Toyota base is the quality assurance. They don’t stamp their product with “Made in the USA” or “Made in Japan”, but instead opt for one label for all: “Made by TOYOTA.” This shows that the product is made in the “Toyota Way.” To achieve this, the company minimized support that comes from Japan to let each of their foreign locations become self-reliant. For example, a Toyota plant recently began production in Texas has made maximum use of its sibling’s experience in Kentucky which has been cultivated over the past 20 years. Toyota believes that in order to reach their goals is through educating people. Multiple Global Production Centers have been built within Motomachi Plant in Toyota City, in United States, the United Kingdom, and Thailand to carry our corresponding activities in the Asia-Pacific, European, and North American regions. To promote the “Toyota Way”, the Toyota Institute established an internal human resources development organization in North America, Europe, Asia, Africa and Oceania. As you can see the pros of the globalization of Toyota are endless. This company alone has created millions of jobs across the world. Winners are not only the workers, but also the buyers, without globalization Toyota automobiles would only be available in Japan. Many people, including me, see globalization of this kind as a beneficial and advantageous result. Toyota companies have not only created jobs for thousands if not millions of people, but their
HRM in any company is a weighty issue that needs much attention where business performance is linked to a HR strategy (Caldwell 2008; Ulrich et al. 2008). In the recent past, competition has become stiff, such that organizations need to come up with other means to compete in the extremely dynamic market world. Thus, companies have shifted their emphasis to Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) where they enhance and empower their personnel in order to increase the productivity and the services offered into the market (Mello 2006). This goes against the traditional ways of increasing the means of competition where organizations place emphasis on tangible resources. In the past, organizations competed in terms of machinery and acquisitions. This has changed greatly due to the changing customer tastes and the diversity of the market in the present (Delery & Doty 1996; Lengnick-Hall et al. 2009).
In this paper we have chosen to explore Procter and Gamble (P&G), a multinational corporation which has lead the way in creating one of the best human resource management systems to date. By using P&G, we are seeking to provide an example of how current multinational companies make decisions to manage their human resources (HR) activities, in search of effective management of their HR costs and in search of professional HR management.
Not all organisations have sole objective of achieving competitive advantage and RBV approach can be introspective without much consideration of socio-political and economical environment (McKenna and Beech, 2008). As this suggests that each corporate environment and requisite strategy are “unique, complex and dynamic” therefore, HRM practices and their implementation in organisation will also be “unique, complex and dynamic” (Buller and McEvoy, 2012, p.53).
The internationalisation of the organizations has made the International human resource management function (HRM) complex. The IHRM has many functions that are the same as that of HRM. However, due to the internationalisation of the companies these IHRM functions must be accommodated to manoeuvre on the large scale while keeping in view, the more complicated and diverse business goals of the respective MNC (Dowling et al., 2009).This essay gives an insight into different roles of the IHRM in the multi-national companies (MNCs) and how these roles differ between the MNCs. Although IHRM performs significant activities in the (MNCs), the jobs performed by IHRM vary in different MNCs depending upon the strategy and structure of the respective MNC that is the degree of integration and centralisation. Also, the IHRM’s role differs between the MNCs on the basis of the size, nature of the business and the institutional and cultural context of the MNC. First, the essay briefly describes the terms that would be relevant to the essay. Second, it
The role of today’s Human Resource Manager (HRM) is much more involved than in the past. Human Resources (HR) has ordinarily been referred to as Personnel. Formerly, the manager in this field, whether it was referred to Personnel or HR, held a narrow margin of responsibilities. Today’s HRM has the unique role of looking out for the interests of both the employee and employer. Technology, globalization and outsourcing have added a challenging twist to HRM responsibilities. Adding further to this unique challenge is the fact that many industrial and skilled labor workers as well as professionals and others belong to labor unions.
Toyota Motor Corporation is one of the largest automakers in the world. At its annual conference in Tokyo on May 8, 2008, the company announced that activities through March 2008 generated a sales figure of $252.7 billion, a new record for the company. However, the company is lowering expectations for the coming year due to a stronger yen, a slowing American economy, and the rising cost of raw materials (Rowley, 2008). If Toyota is to continue increasing its revenue, it must examine its business practice and determine on a course of action to maximize its profit.
Values, notions, ideas and ways of being (Bodley, 1999). The HRM has develop over short long past. After this, multinational sector has gone for lot of progress, surrounded by the areas as like Strategic Human Resource Management and International Human Resource Management. In additional to that, the increasing levels of globalization and internationalization of multinational sector, the development of new promote it likes China, Europe India, Nigiriya ect..
(5) Liker, Jeffrey K. The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004. Print.
Organizations must operate within structures that allow them to perform at their best within their given environments. According to theorists T. Burns and G.M Stalker (1961), organizations require structures that will allow them to adapt and react to changes in the environment (Mechanistic vs Organic Structures, 2009). Toyota Company’s corporate structure is spelt out as one where the management team and employees conduct operations and make decisions through a system of checks and balances.