Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of organizational communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of organizational communication
A toxic handler is one who helps those who are struggling with organizational change to cope with different nuisances associated with the change (Palmer, Dunford, & Akin, 2009). Change that is not communicated well is abrupt and untimely or has unrealistic expectations create toxic feelings in employees that must be handled. A characteristic of a toxic handler is a capacity for empathy and a willingness to act to try to address pain and suffering in others caused by organizational change (Palmer et al., 2009).
In the article chosen, Savannah was a project manger charged with implementing a new program to change the existing promotion system that was based on seniority instead of performance (Frost, 2006). Although she had the support of top management, other managers were angry about the change and began to attack the efforts of Savannah and her team (Frost, 2006). Top management initiated the change and Savannah and her team was to implement it (Frost, 2006). Her team had a hard time because all of the anger concerning the change was directed at them and not top management (Fro...
When Jim Kilts showed up at Gillette in 2001, the first outsider to run the Boston-based company in more than 70 years, he found a business with great brands losing market share. Its acquisitions of Duracell and Braun were not delivering. Sales and earnings were flat, the company had missed its earnings estimates for 15 straight quarters, the stock had plummeted, and Wall Street had lost patience. Yet two-thirds of the top managers were getting top ratings. People were being rewarded for effort; performance, under Mr. Kilts regime, became the new measure.
Harold could have also attended the meetings and taken an initiative to ensure that all employees were happy. Roberts should have focused on his own strengths as a leader and could have identified his areas where he was better than Rankle. This way he would have never thought of changing the job. Roberts could have communicated his concerns regarding Rankle with his supervisor and teammates. Rankle should have taken permission and discuss with others about his new ideas. Base on this case study, it is very clear that effective communication is the key factor in the success of any
The surprising factor to achieve greatness. These disciplined people are leaders of a company who can reach heights with the paradoxical combination of professional will and personal humility. They are modest and give others credit freely with calm determination and bring ambition in the company. The key point of the author is not about importance of assembling a right team by getting the right people onboard in the bus. The author wants right people on the right seat and wrong people off the bus. And then giving out a proper strategic direction to these people to follow. However, the author says that people often attempts to accomplish things in the opposite order.
During a conversation with MacDuffy, the man who interviews the narrator says: “‘It 's not your fault. You new guys don 't know the score. Just like the union says, it 's the wise guys in the office. They 're the ones who make scabs out of you (197)”. Here he is discussing how management manipulates the lower workers without their knowledge. Additionally though, it bears a striking parallel to the letters Bledsoe gave the narrator, as both have a stronger controlling force controlling another group without their knowledge. This is significant as it is a clear example of the influence of powerful people; using a tactic to prevent the common people from rebelling and breaking the current status
Supervisors such as these promote themselves through visible short-range demonstrations of accomplishments, but are unconcerned with staff development or morale (Reed, 2004, p. 67). Toxic leaders affect the atmosphere of an agency by creating a demotivational environment while attendin...
...was no longer to be a matter of status and deference, but of function and quality of performance. And decisions were to be made by the involved collective, respecting the dignity and legitimate interests of all participants.
If Beverly knew about this management styles before heading into the job at Gridlock Meadows she might have been more prepared for what was about to come. This paper might have come off a little bias but remember that each management style has its positive aspects as well as negative ones. The key is recognizing the management style and how to work with each one you may encounter.
Several employees have witnessed varied offensive conduct by Mazey but have kept opinions to themselves until recently (Yemen & Clawson, 2007). Senior management at Hudson is aware of his behavior via 360o reviews; however, Mazey’s ability to produce revenue secured his promotion to vice president (Yemen & Clawson, 2007). Mazey acquiesces to upper management and believes employees of lower stature should do the same for him, while also accepting his unprofessional, degrading and condescending habits (Yemen & Clawson, 2007).
Case study number two is a four-page article written by Marian L. Houser and Astrid Sheil, and it’s titled “How Do You Get Anything Done Around Here?” The article focuses on the concept of real organizational experiences, but primarily Kate Elliot’s experience and dissatisfaction with her job at Donaldson Family Foods, Inc. Kate’s a hard-working, educated woman who is initially impressed with the Donaldson Food, Inc., especially at the opportunity that she has to become the national brand manager. As time goes on, and her first project’s assigned, Kate notices countless negatives within the organization, including how the company remains a low-growth business, its employees’ lack of competitiveness and hurry, and the SMART group’s “Black Hole,” a term referring to the grinding halt that’s applied to all initiatives, ideas, and proposals. In this case, Kate’s cooking bag project faces the dueling black hole. Throughout my paper, I will relate and apply Kate’s experience to organizational culture and socialization, how the conflict is handled, both verbal and nonverbal communication, and possible suggestions for Kate.
An astounding 17% of professionals that were surveyed admitted to being aware of a disruptive behavior within the workplace that resulted in a specific adverse client outcome. O’Daniel & Rosenstine, 2008 (as cited in Arnold & Boggs, 2011).
During this meeting, there were twenty people listed on her roster. Out of the twenty members, only twelve was present. No one took notes at this meeting. I asked her do they normally take notes, and she said no, she writes down the agenda and they go off of that, but she leaves the floor open to have open discussions. On the day visited, a professional with expertise in toxic stress spoke with the group. The group responded well to the information that she was sharing with them. There were open ended questions being asked and the floor was always open to stop the speaker and ask questions. According to Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Toxic stress is a term used by psychologists and developmental neurobiologists to describe the kinds of experiences, particularly in childhood that can affect brain architecture and brain chemistry. They typically are experiences that are bad for an individual during development such as severe abuse. Toxic stress has been defined also in terms of violence; other sorts of experience that a child can have that can be very powerful in a negative way on the brain. The speaker incorporated the activity Ms. TG had the group doing previously with the blocks into her presentation. By the time her presentation was done I noticed that people were asking her questions and she was now sitting amongst the group. There was one individual; he did not seem to care about what was being discussed. While
Elite Engineering has been unable to successfully implement change because they haven’t been able to get the employees to see the need for the change and to believe in the change. “It must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things.” (Kotter & Schlesinger, 2008) Change is often met with resistance. When it comes down to it many people fear change. At Elite Engineering, the engineers were happy with the way things were being run. They enjoyed the billable work they were doing and did not want to take the time to collaborate with others, as it would take away time from their billable work. The engineers saw the billable work they were doing as a way to ensure they received their bonus at the end of the year. However, they were failing to see that the litigation business was going to begin to shrink and in order for them to remain competitive, changes needed to be made. Kotter and Schlesinger state that there are for common reasons that people resist change. The four reasons are the desire not to lose something of value, a misunderstanding of the change and its implications, a belief that the change does not make sense for the organization, and a low tolerance for change. (Kotter & Schlesinger, 2008) At Elite Engineering, I think upper management was unsuccessful at implementing change because the employees didn’t want to lose their bonuses (something of value to them), they misunderstood the change, and they didn’t feel that the change made sense for the organization.
This case study demonstrates a young woman leader, Toby Johnson, who used to serve in the military as a pilot and attended Harvard Business School, joined PepsiCo’s Leadership Development Program (LDP), and was working in the management team at the Williamsport plant. She determined to forge ahead, and led the plant to achieve the Level 3 CI and also won the Doolin Award, which the Williamsport plant had never achieved before. The problem that Johnson encounters currently is that if the plant should continue to forge ahead and achieve the ultimate Level 4 CI, which will cost huge amount of money and efforts with the risk of her sudden leave of plant.
The top management executives that are selecting future candidates for promotions are visiting each branch and doing an investigation to see who may be suited for a promotion for the San Antonio office. Some of the ways they are looking for future candidates is interviewing other coworkers and seeing how their relationships and work ethics are. The four candidates
Paul Evans should not have been allowed to report information to Gable before reporting to Gary because Gary was the head of the project team while Gable was a management support. This fissure in leadership contributed to communication breakdown. Evans knew from experience that Gable was increasingly manipulative and he needed to manipulate results prior ...