“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” (Olen, 304). Throughout history, torture has been used by governments to extract information from prisoners of war to protect the people of the nation (Gushee). The definition of torture provided by U.N. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) regards both extreme physical and mental pain perpetrated on a civilian by a government official or agent (UUSC). There have been plenty of arguments regarding whether or not it is acceptable to torture, if so, under what circumstances does it become adequate. A debate about this issue should not even occur because torture should never be acceptable under any conditions. Torture is never acceptable because of reasons of principle, consequential reasons, and violation of international law (“Why is torture wrong?”).
The first reason of principle why torture should never be acceptable is because torture treats the victims as pawns by dehumanizing the victims and by violating their rights and human dignity. To make torture easy and simple, torturers dehumanize their victim. A human being’s body is an essential part for his or her life; however, the people who torture do not consider a victim’s life as important. Most likely, the first thing a torturer might do is hurt the victim’s physical body by getting him or her weak and then obtain the information he or she knows (“Why is torture wrong?”). Photographs of prisoners in Abu Ghraib prove that victims are being treated worse than animals. One memorable picture of the horrific scene was of electrical wires being attached to a stool where a prisoner was standing (Gates)....
... middle of paper ...
....
“Is torture a necessary evil?” in-debate.com. 2011. In Debate. Web. 14 November 2013.
“Is torture ever justified?” economist.com. 20 September 2007. The Economist Newspaper
Limited. Web. 14 November 2013.
“Is torture ever justified?” teacher.scholastic.com. 2013. Scholastic. Web. 14 November 2013.
“Prohibition of Torture in International Law.” phrtoolkits.org. 2010. Physicians for Human
Rights. Web. 14 November 2013.
Swanson, Emily. “Torture Poll: Most Americans Say Torture Is Justifiable At Times.”
huffingtonpost.com. 14 December 2012. TheHuffintonPost.com. Web. 14 November
2013.
“Torture and Human Rights: A Guide.” Uusc.org. N/A.
“Why is torture wrong?” bbc.co.uk. 2013. The BBC. Web. 14 November 2013.
Wolverton, Joe. “Supreme Court Bombshell: No Right to Remain Silent.” thenewamerican.com.
23 June 2013. Joomla!. Web. 14 November 2013.
Web. The Web. The Web. 14 Nov. 2013. The "LIFE AND TIMES.
Web. The Web. The Web. 22 Nov. 2010. Cohen, Judy, and John Richardson.
The Web. The Web. 22 March 2014. Lizza, Ryan. The.
In his essay “The Case for Torture,” printed in The Norton Reader 13th Edition, Michael Levin argues that torture is justified and necessary under extreme circumstance. He believes that if a person accepts torture to be justified under extreme cases, then the person automatically accepts torture. Levin presents weak argument and he mostly relies on hypothetical scenarios. There is not concrete evidence that torture solves problems and stop crime but rather the contrary. Under international law, torture is illegal and all the United Nation members have to abide by those rules. The use of torture does not keep people safe, but rather the opposite. Torture has a profound effect on democracy. As the use of torture becomes normal in society, the right of the citizen will suffer greatly.
Interrogational torture is one of the many tough ethical questions that people debate about in the United States. Is it right or is it wrong? Many believe that the United States does not practice intense interrogational acts such as torture. Many people have fought to abolish any form of torture while many fight to keep some forms of it to help keep the peace. Whether you believe in it or not, torture is and will always be an ethical dilemma that comes up.
Web. The Web. The Web. 6 June 2015. http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/--100617 Martin, Claire and Siegel, Masada.
Applebaum believes that torture should not be used as a means of gaining information from suspects. Applebaum's opinion is supported through details that the practice has not been proven optimally successful. After debating the topic, I have deliberated on agreeing with Applebaum's stance towards the torture policy. I personally agree with the thought to discontinue the practice of torture as a means of acquiring intel. I find it unacceptable that under the Bush Administration, the President decided prisoners to be considered exceptions to the Geneva Convention. As far as moral and ethical consideration, I do not believe that it is anyone's right to harm anyone else, especially if the tactic is not proven successful. After concluding an interview with Academic, Darius Rejali, Applebaum inserted that he had “recently trolled through French archives, found no clear examples of how torture helped the French in Algeria -- and they lost that war anyway.” There are alternative...
They have fought for years to abolish torture, but others still fight to use some forms of torture while they attempt keeping the peace. Whether you believe in using torture or not, it still is and will always be an ethical issue. Torture as defined by Jocelyn Pollock is “the deliberate infliction of violence and, through violence, severe mental and/or physical suffering upon individuals” (Pollock, 2014). Christopher Tindale is quoted by Bob Brecher in Torture and the Ticking Bomb, and his description of torture is “any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from that person or a third person information or confession, punishing that person for an act committed or suspected to have been committed, or intimidation or dehumanizing that person or other persons” (Brecher,
Though torture and enhanced interrogation are similar in that they both force information from captured individuals, they are basically different due to motives as well as extreme measures used. Enhanced interrogation is used by the United States for certain interrogation methods including “walling, facial hold, facial slap, cramped confinement, wall standing, stress positions, sleep deprivation, and water boarding” (Quigley 3). This method of interrogation is protected against international criminal prosecution. However, torture is known as the practice of inflicting “cruel, inhumane, degrading infliction of severe pain” (Beehner 1) and is “often used to punish, to obtain information or a confession, to take revenge on a person or persons or create terror and fear” (Quiroga 7). Like enhanced interrogation, torture can be used to retrieve information. However, the motive of using torture is not always to save lives. Although enhanced interrogation us...
The ongoing debate between torture and enhanced interrogation techniques is, has been and always will be a hot controversial topic. Whether between different political views, cultures, world leaders or the citizens and society in general, the issue will always be of great importance. Some believe the two are the same, while others feel they differ. Either way, the methods and effectiveness are the major points for concern.
Web. The Web. The Web. 28 Feb. 2014. Hoggart, Simon.
Around the world and around the clock, human rights violations seem to never cease. In particular, torture violations are still rampant all over the world. One regime, the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, establishes a strong elaboration of norms against torture. Despite its efforts, many countries still outright reject its policies against torture while other countries openly accept them, but surreptitiously still violate them. The US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia all have failed to end torture despite accepting the provisions of the Convention.
Torture is the process of inflicting pain upon other people in order to force them to say something against their own will. The word “torture” comes from the Latin word “torquere,” which means to twist. Torture can not only be psychologically but mentally painful. Before the Enlightenment, it was perfectly legal to torture individuals but nowadays, it is illegal to torture anyone under any circumstances. In this essay, I will demonstrate why torture should never acceptable, not matter the condition.
Web. The Web. The Web. 23 November 2011. Doherty, Kathleen.
Web. The Web. The Web. 19 February 2014. Rowan Cris.