Polarization Introduction: PART ONE: POLARIZATION Method 1: Two polarized disks were put into a grooved holder with their polarization axes lined up, and a bright red light emitting diode (LED) was placed on one side, and a light sensor was placed on the other side. Light intensity was measured as a function of the plastic rotating polarizer angle from 0 to 180 degrees. Science Workshop was used to measure the intensity for every 5-degree rotation (Fig 1). Method 2: The mineral calcite
Polarization Polarization is a tendency to reason only in terms of extremes or opposites. The most common type of polarization is group polarization. Group polarization in general refers to the notion that judgments made by a group tend to be more extreme than judgments made by individual members. The concept of group polarization developed from a notion of the “risky shift.” It was originally thought that after group discussion, individuals would make riskier decisions than before. However, researchers
Use of Polarization in Goodbye, Mr. Chips Opposites attract. James Hilton uses this fact in Goodbye, Mr. Chips to create tension in the story; however, he makes greater use of this polarization to develop the character of Chips. Mr. Chips and Katherine Bridges may be viewed not only as opposites but also as arguments. Hilton uses thesis in the form of young Chips and antithesis in the form of Katherine Bridges to arrive at synthesis, the personality and character of the mature schoolmaster
beliefs in general, group polarization and competition, which requires a mutual exclusivity of goal attainment, will lead to more "showdown" situations in which the goal of good government gives way to political posturing and power-mongering. In this paper I will analyze recent political behavior in terms of two factors: Group behavior with an emphasis on polarization, and competition. However, one should keep in mind that these two factors are interrelated. Group polarization tends to exacerbate inter-group
which will give us the answer is, Polarization. These brands, movie & celebrity (sadly it IS a movie and sadly he IS a celebrity) have a huge amount of positive and negative buzz. E.g. According to a HBR study, 33% of people Love McDonald’s and 29% hate it. Similarly, 30% love Starbucks and 23% hate it. What is important to note here is that the difference between brand lovers and brand haters is not much and they are almost comparable. This phenomenon is Polarization. A metric, Brand Dispersion has
Science fiction movies have taken a leap with the use of its new technology: 3D. With the help of 3-D camera systems, projectors, sound effects, and shutter glasses, film makers have been able to improve science fiction movies, captivating audiences of all ages. It was not until 2004 when 3-D technology regained its popularity after having a thwarted emergence during the 1920s. The first 3-D movie was produced in 1922. Although Avatar is considered the best 3-D film ever made, several movie critics
mandates the nation’s present educational ideals and social norms. In addition, the models used by sociologists to describe the American city demonstrates that even the structure of the American city encourages the nation to be racially polarized; polarization that inevitably leads to violence. With obvious constraints, the following exposition points only to a limited portion of the possible roots of the existing superiority views; clearly there are numerous other origins that can be found within the
Abstarct: In this paper we get an overview of the dielectric resonator antenna which replaced the simple form of antennas that were being used for the past ten years. These dielectric antenna have been of a great importance to the research work in antenna field as these have a great dielectric constant and higher Q factor than the other isotropic or directive antennas. Earlier these antennas were considered to be energy storage devices but in this paper we have made use of the DRA antennas as radiators
the gates as a means of creating community, they find that gates can actually promote divisiveness, as residents argue about gate policy and homeowner's association policies. More ominously, Blakely and Snyder argue that gates lead to increasing polarization, us-vs-them attitude of citizens, leaving cities deprived. Among the deprived and polarized are children. They are usually denied a variety of culture as many gated communitites tend not to be richly diverse in class or ethnic standing. This deficiency
parallels the cuckoo in taking over ownership of the Heights, thereby dispossessing the rightful heir, Hareton. Heathcliff destroys the natural familial emotional bonds that previously existed in the Earnshaw household. His presence results in a polarization within the family, at first Mr. Earnshaw and the Catherine become his allies, whereas Hindley becomes his enemy. The role of the usurper leads to Heathcliff's suffering at the hands of Hindley and it is the treatment handed out by Hindley to Heathcliff
Reading Moby-Dick as Ethnic Allegory At a time when images of the white settler conquering the "savage" frontier were prevalent in antebellum America, depictions of racial polarization and, alternately, co-existence among different ethnic groups had already begun to find expression in various artistic mediums, from painting to literature. Today more than ever, such works continue to elicit critical re-examinations where race relations, colonization, and literary representation are concerned
Why The Reveal Of Constantine's Sexuality Is A Massive Win For The Arrowverse With the return of Legends of Tomorrow, we were treated to the return of John Constantine to the Arrowverse for the first time since his appearance in the Arrow Season 4 episode, ‘Haunted’. Now, he’s back and fans are finally getting the story behind his sexuality: he’s bi like his comic book counterpart. This comes with the storyline involving Mallus and Nora Darhk (John Noble and Courtney Ford, respectively) that sees
decried increasing political polarization in the United States, especially as demonstrated by the stark, divisive contrasts in recent election results. Online space is also found to be divided into left and right clusters in recent studies. This study tests the relationships between social media, social network service network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Questions/Expectations: The overarching question: does social media facilitate or attenuate polarization? The investigators identify
According to Oxford Reference, Social Polarization is the splitting of a society into two distinct groups that are different ends of a spectrum. On August 2016, Facebook fired all the human editors for Trending and replaced them with an algorithm that promotes stories based entirely on what Facebook users are talking about according to Ars Technica. This was in response to criticisms that its Trending feature was surfacing news stories that were biased against conservatives. However within 72 hours
Recent scholarly work demonstrates divisions among scholars on the causes and consequences of political polarization (Abramowitz, 2017; Levendusky and Malhotra 2016; Kernell 2016; Brunell, Grofman, and Merrill 2016). However, the polarization literature highlights an ongoing debate as to whether the mass public is polarized as political elites are (Abramowitz and Saunders 2008; Fiorina, Abrams and Pope 2004). The reality is that the mass public, taken as a whole, is not polarized contrary to perceptions
Polarization can be described as “An intense commitment to a candidate, a culture, or an ideology that sets people in one group definitively apart from people in another rival group” (Kernell & Smith 494). Two distinct political parties without any overlapping policies may make it easier for the voter to identify with a party. However, party polarization has a hidden cost which is only evident when politicians of these parties are elected to office. Party polarization leads to an inefficient government
processes we carry out via the Internet have very real consequences. For instance, social media can trigger deindividuation, a phenomenon that can lead us to use the Internet in deviant ways. In addition, social media platforms encourage group polarization, which can further divide groups with contrasting views. Nevertheless, social media has greatly contributed to the self-esteem, social identity, and productivity of many individuals due to the ease and convenience of organizing and joining groups
morals are different. Polarization isn’t inherently a problem in of itself, but the affects that it has on the way we govern ourselves could be problematic. There will never be a time when everyone thinks the same way and accepts other people’s ideas as their own. The root cause of political polarization cannot be tied down to one idea; the way we take the world influences the polarization far more than most people think. In America the main root causes of political polarization can be narrowed down
all discussions of polarization in political science consider it in the context of political parties and the democratic system of the government. When polarization occurs in a two-party system, moderate voices often lose power and influence. Political polarization confers to cases in which an individual's position on a given issue, policy, or person is more likely to be defined by their identification with a particular political party, such as a Democrat or Republican. Polarization as a state refers
Polarization is the trend in which two parties usurp complete power within a political system, then pushing that power in two opposite ends of the spectrum. Sorting, a type of political polarization, can account for the trends in congressional polarization, but scholars often disagree about whether direct polarization or sorting affects Congress. While either of these polarization methods decreased moderates in Congress, these trends differ immensely from public polarization. Congressional polarization