educated, traveler nobleman, Edward de Vere. In his works, William Shakespeare seems to understand a life including royalty
Edward de Vere, also referred to as the Earl of Oxford, is widely considered the most probable candidate for the authorship. De Vere was a poet and known as the patron of writers, keeping his own troupe of actors and was known as the "Italian Earl" after his travels. He was mostly lost to history until the 1920s, “when J. Thomas Looney claimed the earl was the real Shakespeare; an increasing number of books have been published surrounding this theory” (“Edward de Vere - Biography”). Since J. Thomas
5th ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 1999. Mowat, Barbara A. and Werstine, Paul, ed. A Midsummer Night’s Dream The New Folger Library. New York: Washington Square Press, 1993. Shakespeare Oxford Society. 27 Jun. 2001. <http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com> Van Duyn, Barbara. Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. 5 Aug. 2000. http://www.calvin.edu/academic/engl/346/proj/barb/ All Shakespeare. Allstudyguides.com. <http://www.allshakespeare.com/index.php>
Many alternative candidates have been presented, such as Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford. However, these people do not have strong or valid arguments to support their theories. Based on biographical evidence, Shakespeare, not Edward de Vere, most likely wrote Shakespearean works. The arguments for other candidates like de Vere are not strong enough to show that Shakespeare did not write Shakespearean works. The argument for Edward de Vere does sound plausible at first. Many connections have been
William Shakespeare is regarded as one of the most talented and famous playwrights of all time. But there is research being conducted to try to prove that he did not write or produce his own plays or poetry. Many historians and English writing experts believe that he used someone else’s ideas, wrote them down and produced them. Many people believe that he even stole plays from other people. From what we know about him—which is not a lot—he was not highly educated which leads people to believe that
then who did. Many scholars have discussed this over the years, and as many as 58 potential candidates have been picked to have been the real Shakespeare. Many subgroups developed out of the anti-Stratfordians like the Oxfordians, that believed Edward de Vere was the real Shakespeare, and the Baconians, who supported Francis Bacon. Although there are many theories about this subject, not one of them can be said to be the right one without proof. There are many obstacles facing Shakspere that challenge
The Authorship Debate. Shakespeare Resource Center. February 5, 2012 http://www.bardweb.net/debates.html. “Oxford Authorship Argument.” Absolute Shakespeare. 2000-2005. The Oxford arguments: Why Shakespeare could not have authored his works. http://absoluteshakespeare.com/trivia/authorship/authorship_oxford_arguments.htm Earl Staelin. The Case for Edward DeVere, The 17th Earl Of Oxford As Shakespeare. November 8, 2002. http://www.free-books.org/shakespeare/EdwardDeVere-17EarlOxford.htm
SHAKESPEARE: MAN OR MYTH? Who was the real Shakespeare? The son of a Stratford glovemaker? Or was he a forgotten nobleman, the 17th Earl of Oxford? It is the greatest detective story there ever was. As more clues are being found, more and more people are doubting the fact that he ever wrote all his plays or even existed. The big question people are asking is why the man who told so much about who we are tell us so little about himself? That is one of the many reasons why I think he never existed
Many people have heard of the name William Shakespeare, or at least read some of his great literary works. However, there are some people who believe that the great William Shakespeare did not write everything that was acclaimed to him. This theory is the basis for the Authorship question, the question of whether or not William Shakespeare wrote all of his literature or did someone else write it under his name. The authorship question has garnered a lot of attention over the years and many a writer
According to Volker Multhopp in his essay “Why I am not a Stratfordian,” “This man achieved the absolute pinnacle of English literature in an era when class was paramount, yet his own origin was absolutely ordinary-- middle class” (1). According to the Oxford Society in the “Shakespeare Authorship FAQ,” “Nothing about the Stratford man rings true: his character, his background, his education, his family, his friends, his behavior towards his debtors and his neighbors, his recorded conversation and his
people believe that they have found the real author. According to this quote, “An English schoolmaster, J. Thomas Looney went looking for Shakespeare, After years of searching through old documents, Looney came up with a man names Edward De Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford , who lived from 1550-1604,” (Austin Para. 8), It is strong evidence. It means that Looney may found the real author who authored the plays. This also shows that William Shakespeare may not be the author at all. According to this quote
in this case they are wrong. The real author of the Shakespeare is Edward de Vere. The evidence is in the education, mysterious behavior, information saying Shakespeare wasn’t the real author, Shakespeare being the undercover name, and the clues that Oxford is the real author. Most people just want to jump to the conclusion that Shakespeare couldn’t have written the plays. All because he didn’t go to a good school like “Oxford” (“Shakespeare really Talented”). This is evidence that shows he couldn’t
1856 there have been 17 different proposed substitutes for Shakespeare including the Earl of Oxford, Sir Francis Bacon, Christopher Marlowe, the Earl of Derby, the Earl of Rutland, Sir Walter Raleigh and even Queen Elizabeth I herself. Assuming that Shakespeare of Stratford did not write the plays, Charlton Ogburn, author and scholar, believes that a well educated man by the name of Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford fits the description as the author. The author who wrote Richard III, and Hamlet
both William Shakespeare of Stratford and Edward de Vere wrote plays and sonnets under the pen name “Shakespeare,” but he did have the capability to write some of these plays. The most commonly referred-to person that people believe wrote the Shakespearean plays is Edward de Vere (De Vere). Although he could have written a few of these plays, the fact remains that he died almost 20 years before Shakespeare’s last plays were finished and published. Edward de Vere’s education was far superior to that
Bacon and Edward de Vere are the two men that the Oxfordian’s argue wrote the plays. This quote lists some of the possible authors for these plays. The most likely of these men to have written these plays was Edward de Vere. In the plays, there are a lot of biblical allusions and references that Shakespeare uses. A hand annotated bible was found that belongs to Edward de Vere. Most of the passages that are referenced or alluded to in the plays were highlighted in the bible. Although de Vere died before
Folio of Shakespear was released in 1623. The first play was written around 1589-1591. This puts Bacon within the time period to be responsible for the plays. Unlike Shakespeare or Edward de vere. Shakespeare died in 1616 and the highly edited folio was released 7 years after the death of Shakespeare. Similarly Edward de Vere died in 1604 and was not around to do the extensive editing that had taken place by the time of the first folio. If it was edited by others who were not in charge of the plays I
William Shakespeare as the sole author of his proclaimed literary works. Bevington began by initially disproving one of the most popular theoretical alternative authors, The Earl Of Oxford. Many Anti-stratfordians claim that he was the true author of the writing, however the author of this third article proves that as false since The Earl died in 1604, before some of the more famous plays were written including Macbeth, Antony and Cleopatra, and Henry VIII. He continues to abolish the anti-stratfordian
Since the 19th century, the mysterious circumstances surrounding the authorship of William Shakespeare of his many poem and plays has made many scholars and people as the same question: did Shakespeare write his works? Though Shakespeare is known as a poet, playwright, and considered widely as the greatest writer in the English language, Shakespeare’s background is very unclear. In addition, the lack of evidence indicating he was even a writer, cause skeptics to believe William Shakespeare of Stratford-Upon-Avon
The Bard of Avon is a title that was attributed to the world-renowned poet, William Shakespeare, due to the vast array of theatrical works and plays he has written. However, there is a trail of controversy that follows the path of William Shakespeare. Many historians proclaim that William Shakespeare worked as a front-man for an upperclass member of the royal court who desired to keep his identity undisclosed. One famous play that William Shakespeare has been given credit for, Macbeth, also has a
Is Shakespeare REALLY Shakespeare? Scholars think that he was not a real man and another person just used his name to put on the writings. According to some researchers, Shakespeare was not a writer, he was actually an illiterate actor by the name of William Shaxper who was born in Stratford-upon-Avon. Shaxper grew up in an illiterate house and there is no record that he ever traveled outside of England. Despite this information, some historians believe that Shakespeare was the real author but evidence