Rottman v commissioners of police for the Metropolis “Extradition search is lawful, lords say common law power is still available” The name of the parties are (appellant) commissioner of the police of the metropolis,(respondent) Mr. Michael Rottman . The judgment has been held in the house of lords. The judges on this were- Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Hutton and Lord Roger of Earlsferry. The barristers and solicitors in this case were, Mr. Perry, on behalf
Regina v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, Ex Parte Rottman UKHL 20 (2002) 2A.C. 692 s.r.n:130355977 Regina v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, Ex Parte Rottman 16 th May 2002. Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Hoffman, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Hutton and Lord Rodger of Earlsferry. Procedural history: On appeal from a Divisional Court of the Queen’s Decision to the House of Lords. The judicial review against the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and the Home
In the case of R (Roberts) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and others [2014] EWCA Civ 69 before the Court of Appeal, Ms Roberts appealed a decision of the Divisional Court [2012] EWHC 1977 (Admin), which dismissed her claim following an incident when she was stopped and searched under section 60 of the CJPOA 1994. Her case was that the powers to search without reasonable suspicion offended Articles 5 and 8 of the ECHR, which protect the right to liberty and respect for privacy. She was
Gotham was one of the most crime-ridden cities in the world. Cities like Metropolis have Superman to protect the citizens, but Gotham doesn’t have anyone. One night everything was calm and quiet. There were cars driving around and people walking home. Then a mysterious woman slowly walked out of a shady store. It looked like she was in no rush, but as soon as she crossed the street, the store emerged in flames. She then started running to a dark blue car, which had been riddled with bullet holes
occupier would be too wide if they were responsible for the damage caused to the Haynes v Harwood(1935) The Defendant left a horse in a van in a crowded street , a boy on the street threw a rock at the horse which led him to bolt out of the van. The police officer tried saving a woman and a kid and was injured in the process. The defendant owed a duty of care and he had created a source of danger for the public by leaving an unattended horse in a busy street.
Human Rights are commonly recognized as being those rights and freedoms which are essential to the all human beings. In 1215 the Magna Carta introduced the concept of human rights of habeas corpus and trial by jury. They are influenced in maintaining a fair and civilized society. The concept of Human Rights belong to each and every individual regardless of race, nationality, sex, political opinion, socio-economic group or any other status. Human Rights are an essential factor for the full development
Nevertheless, some commentators have stated that the EqA is comprehensive enough since it has extended the duty to, service providers, public functions, and associations in a bid to enhance an organised and methodical approach by eliminating the hurdles in workplaces through taking positive steps. The Code of Practice Services, Public Function, and Association, Chapter 7 strongly supports this stand. It further emphasises that the duty extends beyond ‘just avoiding discrimination”. Therefore, as
decolonization as a violent phenomenon replacing a set of men by another. It executes the strategy in which, “The last shall be the first and first last” (Fanon 28). The settler inaugurates and perpetuates his illicit statute on the colony with violence; police and army are the two wings to ascertain it. It is to be noted that the famous Battle of Plassey (... ... middle of paper ... ... Earth. Trans. Constance Farrington. London: Penguin, 1967. Print. Gopal, Priyamvada. The Indian English Novel: Nation
INTRODUCTION The law of tort concerns what are known as ‘wrongs’ where cases can be brought by a claimant or a plaintiff against a defendant if they thought that they have been ‘wronged’ in any way. The law of tort then intends to remedy these wrongs rather than punish an offender who is responsible for a crime. Tortious actions are thus normally brought by private individuals against other individuals rather than being brought by the State in criminal proceedings. Ben jumped in order to avoid being
The Human Rights Act of 1998 came into power in October 2000, and it represent an honourable epitome of ethical and moral ideologies. As for any idealistic expectations, one must query the effectiveness of the Human Rights Act of 1998 at meeting all its aims in the context of aiding, safeguarding and supporting those in need of assistances from the Social Services in the UK. The objective of this essay is to appraise at the HRA 1998, in terms of its enactment, application, practicability, and commitment
The Exploitation of Puerto Rico by the United States Puerto Rico has had a long history of dependency. Puerto Rico was first colonized by Spain until the Spanish American war, which resulted in the colonization by the United States in 1898. While Spain was in the process of devising an agreement with Puerto Rico that would grant the island autonomy, the invasion of the United States ended any plans that would grant this reprise (Figueroa, 11/19/98). The U.S. decided to partake in this colonial expansion
Law and Medicine The general principle is valid consent must be obtained before medical treatment can commence. In Allen v New Mount Sinai Hospital [1980], J linden stated ‘consent is not a mere formality; it is an important individual right to have control over one’s body, even where medical treatment is involved.’[1] In Schloendorff v society of New York Hospital [1914][2], Cardozo J made a statement “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be