Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
personality differences in the workplace
effect of personality on work performance
personality differences in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: personality differences in the workplace
4).
Discussed below are different researchers’ arguments and explanations on how personality predicts employee performance. This essay will explore both negative and positive ways in which personality can predict the performance, as well as explaining what personality is. Past research has “demonstrated that personality constructs are associated with work performance, with some traits like conscientiousness predicting success around jobs. Other linked with specific occupations e.g. extraversion correlates with success in sales and management as well as training performance supporting”, (Barrick et al., 2002, 87: p.43).
Different people describe the word ‘personality’ differently. Martin et al. (2010,p.610) describes personality as a “particular pattern of behavior and thinking that prevails across time and situations, and differentiates one person from another”. According to Mullins and Christy (2013,p.136), they explain that Personality may be perceived as “consisting of stable characteristics that explains why an individual behaves a certain way. Independence, conscientiousness, agreeableness and self-control are all examples of personality characteristics”. Mullins and Christy (2013, p.136) further explain that we can only identify and understand a person’s personality from listening, watching and observing them. For instance, an independent person may show independence characteristic by demonstrating a strong sense of self-sufficiency. It would be expected that this individual would not be dependable on other people around him and if this is established, it can support the characteristic being a consistent part of the person’s behavior. Individuals are therefore generally consistent in the way they respond to situations. At...
... middle of paper ...
...n, J. (2000). Personality and job performance: Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.85, 869-879.
Judge, T. A., Locke E.A., (1993). Effect of dysfunctional thought processes on a subjective well-being and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 475-490.
Judge, T. A., Higgins, C.A., Thoresen, C.J., & Barrick, M. R.(1999). The big five personality traits, general metal ability and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621-652.
Luthans, F. and Youssef, C.M. ‘Emerging Positive Organizational Behavior’, Journal of management, vol.5 no.3 June 2007 pp. 321-49.
Martin, G.N, Carson, N.R, Buskist, W. (2010). Psychology. (4th ed). Harlow: Allyn & Bacon
Mullins, L.J. & Christy. (2013). Management and Organization Behavior. (10th ed). Harlow: Pearson.
Robertson, L. ‘Undue Diligence’, People Management, no.22, November 2001, pp. 42-3.
Psychologists defined personality as that make people uniquely themselves, to be all-inclusive characteristics, helped people appreciate the challenging environment of each individual Cervone & Pervin (2013). Beginning with, individuals that are unnatural by unconscious traits, push or pull into instant awareness. For example, the things people do to others that normally parents would do to their children without identifying whether they are encouraged by their aspiration to bear a resemblance to their parents. Following, ego forces people that are peculiar that provide a sense of personality or self. For example, we often strive to maintain a logic of comprehensive knowledge and reliability in one behavior. Next, biologically a person with a distinctive physiological, temperamental,
One of the big facets of Holland’s theory is that individuals who’s personality patterns and work environment are congruent will have a better career outlook and success. As well, individuals who’s work and personality types that are different may not have such a harmonious career experience. Additionally, individuals who’s personality patterns, their multiple personality factors, that are similar will have consistency and may be easier searc...
During hiring process, employers use a wide variety of tests to choose the best candidate for their company. These tests are used to eliminate candidates that are not fit for the company. The personality test, is one of many that is being used in many organizations as a means of making a hiring decision. It has been studied that personality traits predict success in job performance. Having the ability to judge the candidate before hiring can ultimately forecast how fit the employee is for the company. Personality tests uses conscientiousness, openness, extraversion, agreeableness, and emotionally stable as predictors of job performance. Companies want to know what type of personality traits you have before hiring, for the reason that bad hiring
In an attempt to hire the best possible candidate and to properly analyze current workers, many companies have used some form of personality testing to attempt to better know their employees. Personality testing has shown the employers are desperately trying to fit the perfect person into the perfect position. Some of the "master chefs" of the selection business are paying special attention to the new chemistry between personality tests, competency requirements, and behavioural interviewing. But is the process of personality testing truly accurate? This paper will go into detail about how personality testing came to pass and how it evolved into the present environment. Furthermore, it will elaborate two major arguments as to why personality testing is not an adequate method of the hiring process and, mainly, how these arguments are addressed and dealt with by the creators of the tests.
To prepare for this paper, I took personality and academic tests. I listened to lectures, and researched papers. The purpose of this paper is to get to know myself and familiarize myself with the jobs that suit me. “There are no good or bad personalities. There are positive and negative traits of each personality. Positive traits carried to the extreme become negative traits.” (McConnell)
Personality refers to a dynamic and complex set of unique psychological characteristics that every individual has instilled in them. Personality can thus be known as the consistency in an individual’s ways of being – that is, the way they think, act, react and perceive things. (Personality and Spirituality; n.d.). Many theories have been established to understand how personality develops. Examples of these theories include Erik Erikson’s Life Approach theory, Skinners Behaviourist theory and Maslow’s Humanistic Needs theory.
Personality does not have a specific definition, however its popular definition is ‘a dynamic organisation, inside the person, of a psychophysical systems that create the person’s characteristic patterns of behaviour, thoughts, and feelings’ by Allport (1961, as cited in Maltby, Day, & Macaskill, 2013, p. 5). Personality is important in many areas of life as it can be used to predict behaviour (Maltby et al., 2013). Thus, psychologists are interested to seek to explain the motivation basis of behaviour, development of personality, personality disorders and how it influences psychology research. One of the most comprehensive theories to personality is the psychoanalysis approach, which was first founded by Sigmund Freud (Maltby et al., 2013).
An individual’s behaviour may differ depending on the circumstances they are in though there are definite signs of repetitive behaviour when placed in majority of the situations. These characteristics are known as traits which make up the personality of each person (Engler, 2014). Personality theorists do not have a mutual agreement on how the term personality should be used. They each have their definition of personality thus providing a large number of diverse personality theories (Engler, 2014). For example, Eysenck (1970) defined personality as a relatively permanent and consistent composition of an individual’s disposition that in turn establishes how the person adjusts to their
Murnoe, S. (2014). "How Personality Affect Work Behavior". Available: http://smallbusiness.chron.com/personality-affects-wor-behavior-45940-html. Last accessed 18th February, 2014.
Allport defines personality as ‘the dynamic organisation within the individual of those psychological systems that determine his unique adjustment to his environment’ (Allport, 1937). An individual’s unique personality traits and attributes are a powerful indicator of how he/she will interact with the work environment. The difference between average and outstanding employees can often be solely personality related. As the employee is the most valuable asset to the company, ‘selecting the right employee during the process is critical’ (Carbery and Cross, 2013, pp. 41-53)
Understanding that not everyone has the same values or personalities in the work place is very important when in a manager’s position. There are some people in the world that can differentiate away from work personalities and at work personalities. Personality traits are particular tendencies to feel, think, and act in certain ways that can be used to describe the personality of every individual. Understanding the personalities of managers helps to understand their behavior and approach on managing their employees.
Mak, S., & Vearing, A. (2007). Big Five Personality and Effort-Reward Imbalance Factors in Employees’ Depressive Symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(7), 1744-1755. Retrieved from
The distinctive characteristics and qualities of any one person is one way to define personality. According to Feist & Feist (2009) personality is described as a pattern of relatively permanent traits and unique characteristics that give both consistency and individuality to a person’s behavior. These traits are the precursor of behavior as per individuality, and that of behavior that is consistent throughout life. Although a person can argue the fact that traits is a disposition of genetic predisposition of certain characteristics, the pattern in which these are characterized are different. Each person’s anatomy, intelligence, and temperament are differently and each owns a unique personality, different from parents, grandparents, and any other individual on this planet. Personality theorists’ however may not concur.
Personality traits can be manifested as strengths or weaknesses depending on the situation, and personality tests can help individuals maximize strengths and minimize weaknesses within the organizational structure. Organizational behavior is critical to organizational effectiveness, and these tests can also point individuals toward certain careers or organizations that are good fits. Pearson Education’s MyManagementLab (2016) contains a series of personality tests and the following discussion analyzes the results of these tests as they apply to my personality and my career. The writing contains illustrations of my personality traits in action. The text also highlights areas of improvement that will enable me to be a better employee, co-worker,
One of the most prominent trends in organization today is the use of team to accomplish the work, which have assigned to an individual. Every team is made up of specific individuals and they are specialized in certain area of interest. If one of the specifications is missing It can be reflected on their performance. It indicates that, every individual is important for the organization. An individual’s performance within an organization and its relationship with its subordinates and coworkers is highly influenced by the Big Five personality traits. My Big five test results depicted that I am traditional/conventional individual with significantly high percentile of conscientiousness and agreeableness. I also have lower neuroticism and slightly