Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
chemical warfare through out the wars
What Where The Causes Of The Second World War And It Effects
chemical warfare through out the wars
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: chemical warfare through out the wars
Theory of War
The Theory of War is an ideology of what is acceptable in the context of war which covers aspects of war including reasonable cause, treatment of prisoners, what kind of tactics are aloud, and so. All of these are split in to two different categories; with one being the right to go to war, and the conduct of war. Many influences of the Theory of War include many Christian ideals which can reflect religions impact on the world.
Some of the first known ideas that relate to the Theory of War date back to 400 BCE with the Mahabrarata, an Indian epic which doesn't directly establish war theory but lays down some of the principles of war theory in concern with how war should be conducted. In the epic there is a talk amongst a bunch of brothers who contemplate if war is ever justified. As discussion ensued they came to an agreement on certain things that would justify the start of a war an approved war tactics. Criteria that were agreed upon consisted of just cause, chariots only used on chariots, no poison arrows, fair treatment of the wounded, as well as no attacking civilians. With this gives us a sense of ethical conduct in war and responsibility to abided by those rules if we want others to follow them.
Saint Augustine and then much later Thomas Aquinas laid out their contribution to the Theory of War in the Christian perspective which can be found in the Just War Doctrine of the Catholic Church. Saint Augustine a Christian theologian believed that peace should be the first option and war being the last possible option if all other methods are ineffective. In addition to that he stated that if one needs to defend himself, by killing another it does not break the commandment thou shall not murder especially if comm...
... middle of paper ...
... the biggest reasons to label them as unjust is for the way some countries conducted themselves during the war involving the killing of innocent civilians or treatment of POW’s. But to look at a more positive aspect of how the Theory of War has been put into effect is the fact that there was a major decline in the use of chemical weapons after World War 1 as well as the campaign to get rid of nuclear weapons.
Works Cited
Souces
“Just war theory” Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., 09 Nov. 2013. Web. 13 Nov. 2013.
“World War I” Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., 12 Nov. 2013. Web. 13 Nov. 2013.
“World War 2” Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., 12 Nov. 2013. Web. 13 Nov. 2013.
“Korean War” Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., 12 Nov. 2013. Web. 13 Nov. 2013.
"World War II". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2013. Web. 05 Nov. 2013. .
Storey, William Kelleher. First World War : A Concise Global History. Rowman & Littlefield Pub., Inc, 2010. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed March 11, 2012).
The problem is that these few criteria for a just war aren’t easy to apply. According to Wink the criteria themselves is not the problem “but the fact that they have been subordinated to the myth of redemptive violence” (Wink 290). Making the just war theory a way to try and justify wars that are unjustifiable. Leading him to believe we should instead change the just war criteria to violence-reduction criteria, since that is what we are all after in the long run. He believes this will be a good medium for both advocates of nonviolence and the just
Moseley, Alexander. "Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy." Just War Theory. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 10 Feb. 2009. Web. 31 Mar. 2012. .
Before in the introduction, the essay introduced limited war and total war, and there is a difference between the two wars. Limited war is war with restriction such as weapon usage (not using nuclear weapons) and territories involved. A limited war follows the ‘Just War Theory’, while total war is solely meant on pure obliteration of opposing side.
"World war 2: A Brief History ." us-history.com. N.p., 13 3 2012. Web. 3 Apr 2014.
McDonald. “Just War Theory.” Humanities. Boston University. College of General Studies, Boston. 24 February 2014. Lecture.
"World War II Fast Facts." CNN. Cable News Network, 27 Jan. 2014. Web. 24 Jan. 2014.
Even though many credit St. Augustine with founding the just war theory, this view is partially misleading. Augustine synthesized ideas from classical Greco-Roman and Christian philosophy to construct his theory, so credit can also be given to philosophers like Aristotle and Cicero. Since then, it has been modified by many notable thinkers such as St. Thomas Aquinas, Hugo Grotius, and Francisco Suarez (Orend). Technicalities aside, Augustine was a pivotal figure in developing our contemporary understanding of this tradition (Massaro 70).
The just war theory allows for war to be declared in response to a case of substantial aggression; however, this is a vague term. To establi...
War is a universal phenomenon, it is a violent tool people use to accomplish their interests. It is not autonomous, rather policy always determines its character. Normally it starts when diplomacy fails to reach a peaceful end. War is not an end rather than a mean to reach the end, however, it does not end, and it only rests in preparation for better conditions. It is a simple and dynamic act with difficult and unstable factors which make it unpredictable and complex. It is a resistant environment where the simplest act is difficult to perform. In this paper, I will argue why war is a universal phenomenon and what are the implications of my argument to strategists.
detail the ways that war has been perceived and how this impacts the topics of war and
The first concept is Clausewitz’s Trinity of War which is comprised of “…three categories of forces: irrational forces…; non-rational forces…; and reason or rational calculation…” [Bassford, pg 205]. The irrational forces are hostility and violence that originate mainly with the people and are the impetus of a political solution that may result in war. The non-rational forces refer to chance and probability which are primarily...
...f war. It’ll probably be utopian to claim that all of Clausewitz's military thoughts have remained relevant. His vision of war did not include its economic, air, sea, and space dimensions, for example. But his concept of war, his trinity, and his understanding of the relationship between politics and war “will remain valid as long as states, drug lords, warrior clans, and terrorist groups have mind to wage it”. (Echevarria, 1996) I would agree that it is not that Clausewitz provides the best theory of war that ever could be, but only that it is the best available. (Gray, Clausewitz, History, and the Future Strategic World, 2003) Therefore as long as communities wage war in order to preserve their identities as well as pursue their interests, Clausewitz’s theory will remain a useful tool for understanding and analyzing war and violent conflict. (Herberg-Rothe, 2009)
Morality is hard to define, and nearly impossible to agree upon; however, when it comes to war, there is a single “widely accepted moral theory” that reaches beyond borders . Just war theory, a doctrine originally attributed to the Christian theologian Saint Augustine , postulates that certain circumstances can lead to the justification of war, particularly if war is used to prevent even greater atrocities from occurring in the future. In its fundamental charter, the United Nations even articulates that every state has the right to go to war in its charter. In its broadest definition, just war theory declares that war may be justifiable if the states involved have both jus ad bellum, or just cause, and jus in bello, or just conduct in war;