Throughout this essay I hope to analyse theoretical organizational behaviour by drawing on my own experiences from working in groups. The groups I am going to use as part of my examples are all from formal groups. Huczynski and Buchanan (2007, p. 291) gives a good definition of Formal groups in a few bullet-points, where one of them is task-orientation which in my opinion has clearly characterized the groups I am talking about. The groups are not necessarily consisting of like-minded people, but individuals randomly picked by the lecturer/tutor which in many cases leads to different disagreements as the groups try to establish itself and the members of the group try to find their role within the group. Bruce Tuckman came up with a theory in the 1960s to explain how a group goes through several different stages on its way to success, which is known as the Tuckmans Stages of Group Development (Anon 2009, 12manage.com).
As in many of the P&O groups my group didn’t meet up more than we had to, and we delayed it for as long as possible. When I am thinking back to how I felt at the moment and what I now understand after talking to other members of my group, is that we all waited for someone else to take the initiative to set up a meeting. After a while something that has happened in several of the groups I am part of at the University happened. One of the girls decided to take the initiative and arranged a group meeting. Why it was a girl and not a boy, at least in my groups who finally decided to take the initiative is something I am not sure about. I’ve tried to find research that can support the argument that girls are more organized, and therefore more easily can take responsibility for planning a meeting. However, I have not...
... middle of paper ...
...s_tuckman_stages_team_development.html
[Accessed 07.04.2009]
Barker, J. R., 1993. Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (1993), pp. 408-437.
Belbin Associates. Team Role theory. Available from: http://www.belbin.com/rte.asp?id=8
[Accessed 09.04.2009]
David. D.E. and Eric van Dijk., 2008. Leader-Follower Effects in Resource Dilemmas: The Roles of Leadership Selection and Social Responsibility, Group Processes Intergroup Relations 2008, 11, pp.355-369.
Gersick, C.J.G., 1988. Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31 (1).
Guirdham, M., 2002. Interactive Behaviour at Work. 3rd Edition. London: Prentice Hall.
Huczynski A.A. and Buchanan D.A., 2007. Organizational Behaviour. UK: Prentice Hall International.
The core principles of Applied Behavior Analysis were seen in several of this weeks required readings, appearing in all or multiple sources. Their definitions varied in each reading, all providing more clarification upon the previous. The first term, applied, refers to the "commitment to affecting improvements" in the field. (Cooper 16) Baer, Wolf and Risley said that whether or not something is applied is determined "by the interest which society shows in the problems being studied." (Baer 92) Both sets of authors emphasize that importance of the practitioner taking ownership in dictating how important it is to change the designated behavior. Also, the importance the behavior holds in society, because many of them represent the clients
Vroom, V. H. & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
The report is directed at presenting a case study on Organizational behavior that revolves around Scania, the leading manufacturers and marketers of trucks and buses in the world with globally administered operations. Several models and theories of organizational behavior will be highlighted and discussed in this paper.
Tuckman’s theory of development claims, “In the first stage of team development or organization, individuals come together to establish the ground ru...
Larson, C. and LaFasto, F. (1989), Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stewart, G., Manz, C., & Sims, H., (1999). Teamwork and Group Dynamics. New York: Wiley. pp. 70- 125.
Perrin, C. (2010). LEADER VS. MANAGER: WHAT'S THE DISTINCTION? The Catalyst, 39(2), 6-8. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/610477001?accountid=12085Stevenson, W. J., (2012), Operations Management (11th ed). New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
A group can be define as ‘any number of people who (1) interact with one another; (2) are psychologically aware of one another and (3) perceive themselves to be a group’ (Mullins, L, 2007, p.299). Certain task can only be performed by combined effort of a group. Organisation can use groups to carry out projects, which will help to achieve its overall aim. However, for the group to be successful they must understand what is expected of them and have the right skill to complete the task. . (Mullins, L, 2006)
Engleberg, Isa N. and Dianna R. Wynn. Working in Groups. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2012. Print.
Norman Brinker has become known as an entrepreneur, pioneer, visionary and mentor in the restaurant industry. He has been involved in the industry for over 40 years. In the 1950’s Norman Brinker started his career in restaurants as partner in the Jack-in-the-Box restaurant chain. Here Brinker found a new love for the restaurant business.
COGHLAN, D (1994) ‘Managing organizational change through groups and teams,’ Leadership and Organization Development Journal 15(2): 18-23
What drives motivation? How far will one go to achieve their goal? Does it mean compromising their ethical beliefs or will they succeed following their ethical compass? For many, they will do just about anything, include being unethical. No boundary, no barrier, no obstacle will stop them. A great example is Margaret Tate, an Executive Editor in Chief of a book publishing firm from the movie “The Proposal”. The movie depicts various management and observation behavior concepts covered in Organizational Behavior such as communication process model, power and counter power, the MARS Model, and values and ethics.
“Informal groups have a powerful influence on the effectiveness of an organization, and can even subvert its formal groups. But, the informal group’s role is not limited to resistance. The impact of the informal group upon the larger formal group depends on the norms that the informal group sets. So the informal group can make the formal organization more effective, too.” Informal groups can either be a manager’s best friend or worst enemy. Group Development: The Formation of Informal Work Groups Informal work groups are part of any working environment; how they form, the leadership within the group and how these groups communicate, follow the same basic model. “Groups are particularly good at combining talents and providing innovate solutions to possible unfamiliar problems.” “There are five stages of group development. The first is forming,which is where the group first comes together. Everyone is usually polite. Conflict is seldom voiced directly. Individuals will be guarded in their own opinions and reserved.” The second form of developmentis “storming a chaotic vying for leadership and trailing of group operates.” The third is norming as the second stage evolves the rules of engagement for the group becomes established, and the scopes of the group’s task or responsibilities are clear and agreed. Fourth is performing,not all groups reach this point. Everyone knows each other well enough to be able to work together. And the fifth stage is adjourning; this is about the completion and disengagement of the tasks and group members. The formations of informal work groups are employed by an organization to perform specific functions. Informal groups almost always arise ...
Working in groups is challenging at times. Other times it is very rewarding. We are so focused on life that we do not take time to reflect on things as much as we should. Being in a Groups class has opened my eyes to a whole new world. I have begun to question, explore, and even understand how things work. I even get how they work sometimes. Not only is there a process involved in making individual decisions, process is involved in group decisions as well. This paper attempts give insight into my reflection of my group decision process.
Since its emergence as a field of study, there have been some important contributions to public administration. Its goal has always been to improve productivity which then improves workplace performance. All of the contributions have been aimed at completing the work with the highest level of efficiency and at the lowest cost.