Theodor Mommsen’s (1817-1903) influence on generations of scholars is both uncanny and profound. During the course of his life, Mommsen published over 1,500 works, many of which are considered the bedrock of entire fields of study. Although much of Mommsen’s work has been superseded by subsequent scholars, Mommsen laid the foundation for all modern scholarship in Roman history and Roman law. Among the great scholars of the 19th century, Mommsen is perhaps the most influential of them all.
Mommsen was born in Schleswig, the son of a Lutheran pastor. Mommsen was instilled with the value of education, attending the Gymnasium at Altona from 1834 to 1838. His father exhibited an “Enlightened rationalism,” and was not fundamentalist. Yet, Mommsen demanded ever more rational explanations, and ultimately abandoned Christian belief in 1837. Mommsen’s writings seem to equate pre-Christian antiquity to light and rationalism, and Christianity with darkness and emotionalism. Several historians have suggested that Mommsen replaced his lost Christianity with a commitment to philology. Perry even argues that Mommsen turned to the ancient Romans for guidance, in place of religion. Following Altona, Mommsen studied jurisprudence at the University of Kiel from 1838 to 1843. Here, Mommsen was influenced by Burchardi, a pupil of Friedrich Karl von Savigny (1779 – 1861), “one of the founders of the historical school of jurisprudence,” which stressed the close interrelationship between law and history. Mommsen also came into contact with Otto Jahn (1813 – 1869), who emphasized the study of ancient language and its interrelationship with ancient institutions and life.
Upon graduation, Mommsen took an appointment at a school for young girls, ...
... middle of paper ...
...0-121.
Sanders, Henry A. “The Works of Theodore Mommsen.” The Classical Journal 13, no. 3 (Dec. 1917): 177-185.
Saunders, Dero A. and John H. Collins. Introduction to The History of Rome, by Theodor Mommsen, 1-17. New York: Dover Publications, 2013.
Tucker, Avizier. Our Knowledge of the Past: A Philosophy of Historiography. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Walsh, P.G. Review of Theodor Mommsen. Otto Jahn: Briefwechsel, 1842-1868, by Lothar Wickert. The Classical Review, New Series 13, no. 2 (1963): 238-239.
Wickert, Lothar. “Mommsen, Theodor.” Britannica Biographies (March 2012): 1-2. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f5h&AN=32418398&site=ehost-live [accessed December 4, 2013].
Wiedemann, Thomas. Review of Theodor Mommsen und das 19 Jahrhundert, by Alfred Heuss. The Classical Review, New Series 48, no. 1 (1998): 161-163.
P Bradley. Ancient Rome, using evidence. (2000) [United Kingdom] Cambridge University Press. Pgs 516-519, 534-535, &555-557
...es are manipulated for his argument. Goldhagen’s controversial and stimulating study encourages research to continue and in 2013 Jewish leaders pressured Pope Francis to open the Vatican archives from 1939-1947. The opening of these archives will instigate more investigations in this field and until these archives are opened the historical record will not be clarified. The importance of these archives illustrates the interesting nature of historical literature. The study of history focuses predominantly around primary materials, however these materials do not provide a definitive depiction of the past. Historians analyze primary sources to deduce an interpretation of the past. The discrepancies between historian’s interpretations form historiographical debate. It would be interesting to examine the extent to which historians are perhaps just academic storytellers.
Livius, Titus. The Early History of Rome. Trans. Aubrey De Sélincourt. London: Penguin Group, 2002. N. pag. Print.
Meech, Sanford Brown and Hope Emily Allen, eds. The Book of Margery Kempe. EETS 212. London: Oxford University Press, 1940.
Livy’s The Rise of Rome serves as the ultimate catalogue of Roman history, elaborating on the accomplishments of each king and set of consuls through the ages of its vast empire. In the first five books, Livy lays the groundwork for the history of Rome and sets forth a model for all of Rome to follow. For him, the “special and salutary benefit of the study of history is to behold evidence of every sort of behaviour set forth as on a splendid memorial; from it you may select for yourself and for your country what to emulate, from it what to avoid, whether basely begun or basely concluded.” (Livy 4). Livy, however, denies the general populace the right to make the same sort of conclusions that he made in constructing his histories. His biased representation of Romulus and Tarquin Superbus, two icons of Roman history, give the readers a definite model of what a Roman should be, instead of allowing them to come to their own conclusion.
4)Rosenstein, Nathan Stewart., and Robert Morstein-Marx. A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2006. Print.
Spielvogel, Jackson J. “Chapter 21: Reaction, Revolution, and Romanticism, 1815-1850.” In Western Civilization Volume II: Since 1500, 632-664. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth, 2009. Print.
Beardsley, Monroe, ed. The early European Philosophers From Descartes to Nietzsche. second. New Yorkcity, New York: random house, inc, 1960. 56. Print.
Stedman, Edmund Clarence. Scribner's Monthly, Vol. XX, May-Oct. 1880, pp. 107-124. Reprinted in Nineteenth-Century Literature Criticism, Vol. 16. GALILEO. .
"Morton, Thomas - Introduction." Literary Criticism (1400-1800). Ed. Thomas J. Schoenberg. Vol. 72. Gale Cengage, 2002. eNotes.com. 2006. 21 Feb, 2011
Howatson, M.C., ed. The Oxford Companion to Classical Literature. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989. Print.
ABSTRACT: There have been many interpretations of Bildung in the history of German philosophy, from the Medieval mystics to the secularization of the Enlightenment. Wilhelm von Humboldt's work at the end of the 18th century is a good example. He placed the idea of Bildung at the center of his work because it was rooted in a dynamic, transforming idea of the natural and human worlds while also being oriented toward a model of balance and perfection. Von Humboldt's interpretation of modernity is characterized by a strong emphasis on change as well as the need to find criteria for guiding such a transformation that has no intrinsic or predetermined end. Love of classical antiquity was not merely nostalgia for a lost world, a normative current that placed the idea of perfection and balance foremost in order to achieve the ideal of Humanitas in an attempt to overcome the unilaterally of modernity.
---. "8- Family History in the Roman North-West." The Roman Family in the Empire: Rome, Italy, and Beyond. Ed. Michele George. Oxford, England: Oxford UP, 2005. 231-54. Questia School. Web. 5 May 2014.
In more detail, the questions that will arise in this paper are as follows; what were the most significant changes that happened from the classical
ABSTRACT: Historical research was one of Jean-Paul Sartre's major concerns. Sartre's biographical studies and thought indicate that history is not only a field in which you gather facts, events, and processes, but it is a worthy challenge which includes a grave personal responsibility: my responsibility to the dead lives that preceded me. Sartre's writings suggest that accepting this responsibility can be a source of wisdom. Few historians, however, view history as transcending the orderly presenting and elucidating of facts, events, and processes. I contend that Sartre's writings suggest a personally enhancing commitment. A lucid and honest response to the challenges and demands of history and the dead lives that preceded my own existence is an engagement that requires courage, wisdom, and thought. The consequences of this commitment for teaching history is discussed.