The Stranger and The Guest

1889 Words4 Pages

French author and playwright Albert Camus once said, “He who despairs over an event is a coward, but he who holds hope for the human condition is a fool.” In the The Stranger and The Guest this philosophy is expanded on by demonstrating how those who do not conform to society are isolated, and portrayed as a threat to society because of their unique beliefs. The most prominent similarity among Daru and Meursault is that they are not able to accept the abstract morals of society, and prefer isolation. For them, relating to the physical world is much easier because it concrete, rather than ambiguous like the moral ideals held by society. Resulting from this objection to societal beliefs they become indifferent and detached which, in-turn allows both protagonists to ignore the rules of society and by doing so expose its innate flaws. In The Guest, Daru regularly observes his physical surroundings, especially the sun and the snow at the barren, isolated place he calls home. Daru discusses the burning of the sun “the earth shriveled up little by little, literally scorched every stone bursting into dust under one’s foot” (Guest 304). Despite the crippling drought, followed by snow, Daru does not complain, but instead is content with the landscape. As the schoolmaster he is like “a monk in his remote schoolhouse, nonetheless satisfied with the little he had and with the rough life” (Guest 304). Despite the, “cruel to live in, even without men – who didn’t help matters anyway” (Guest 304) location where Daru lives he enjoys the quiet solitude that comes with being the schoolmaster, in a sense it liberates him from ills society. Although he lives in such unforgiving conditions the land is all he knows, everything else is foreign to him. ... ... middle of paper ... ... inability to make a decision lands him in the middle. His unwillingness to pick a side does not affect his moral compass however, he believes that regardless of what the Arab did he deserves the right to choose and be free from societies laws because they are flawed. Meursault and Daru are both “strangers” because they are not able to understand the other characters, which are each indirectly associated with an aspect of society. Camus uses the actions and words of seemingly unimportant characters to allude to the shortcomings of society. In both texts the protagonists view the other characters in the story from an outsider view, allowing for a new perspective in which society and its problems can be assessed. By making the protagonists detached from society, the underlying issues within society can be explored from an objective viewpoint.

Open Document