Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of cultural assimilation
Mcdonaldization in today's society
Mcdonaldization in today's society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of cultural assimilation
The Pitfalls of Commercialization: Uncontrolled Fabrication of Cultures?
Most societies go through the process of Sociocultural Evolution as they aggrandize and develop. Sociocultural evolution is constituted by the doctrines of cultural and social evolution, deciphering how cultures and societies have transformed over time. It refers to the process by which structural reorganization is affected through time, eventually producing a form or structure which is qualitatively different from the ancestral form. The perpetual adaptation to environmental changes enables societies to improve their way of living by gaining efficiency (through technological innovations) and creativity. This analysis will discuss Ritzer’s (1983) The McDonaldization of Society and Instant Karma: The Commercialization of Asian Indian Culture (Sandhu 2004) – which talks about two distinctive cultural societies that are lost beyond the shuffle of commercialization.
Sociologist George Ritzer (1983) expands the perspicacity of The McDonaldization of Society in which he elucidates that McDonaldization occurs when a culture possesses the idiosyncrasies of a fast-food restaurant. Ritzer (1983) argues that the model of rationalization in contemporary America is no longer a bureaucracy, but rather a fast-food restaurant as a more archetypal paradigm. The author discusses the magnitudes of rationalization that the changing societies pose (efficiency, predictability, calculability, and control over uncertainty) and the irrationality of rationality.
Ritzer (1983) emphasizes the four primary constituents of McDonaldization (efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control). The first component, efficiency, suggests the optimal capacity of the method for accompl...
... middle of paper ...
...tance of such practice and tradition. The biggest concern is the issue behind the ethnic identity confusion from the aftermath of this craze. For the young adults, such cultural practice and tradition are what constitute a huge part of their identity. For those who are just along for the ride, this is just a mere fashion statement, a fad—something temporary. The transition from foreign to fashionable removed Asian Indians from their own culture, customs, and traditions (Sandhu 2004).
Assuredly, such obstacles in changing societies are bound to happen. As we adapt to our environment and culture, we learn ways that can help with innovation and development of societies. Gaining a real perspective and having a control over the situations is going to help eliminate the formation of irrationality of rationality, and establish a solid foundation for ethnic identities.
For this study, researcher classified the cultural identity of the participants as traditional, assimilated, bicultural, or marginalized by how they identified with highly with Indian values, highly with white values, ewally with both, or with none.
...onstrate the nature of the Kathmandu people to always want to remain “in”. Each section has an underlying theme of globalization and the aspiration for connectivity to western ideologies. The most significant and interesting aspects of these readings was the importance consumption has on the well-being of the citizens of Kathmandu. Consumption has to help the economy, but I found it very interesting that Mark Liechty only chose to focus on the deep rooted necessity to stand out but also belong. These readings fail to address in detail how the consumption of the middle class affects the lower and higher groups. I found myself asking; what about the lower and higher classes? The overarching theme threaded together by these chapters is displaying the important role consumption, in relation to social and economic standing, means to the middle-class people of Kathmandu.
Each person has its own point of view on how culture is develop and which aspect is beneficial and enjoy the history behind the culture. On the other hand, we make assumption about cultural identify without analyzing the factual data. Additionally, individual experiences does reflex the life the person has lived and the achievement embody a sense resiliency and failure for a certain period. “A study reveals culture as potentially ephemeral beliefs, beliefs, feelings, and behavior, unique in their details to each individual. No two people can live precisely identical life histories” (Handwerkker, 2002,
In his video, Ritzer identifies four main principles of McDonaldization: predictability, calculability, efficiency, and control.
When Ritzer began writing and talking about the dangers of "McDonaldization," he struck a nerve: some agreed with him, but many others rushed to defend the pop-culture institution. He went on to write a social critique on the subject, applying sociological theories to the culture in a way that lay readers would understand. The McDonaldization of Society (Pine Forge/Sage Publications) was successful enough that he wrote several follow-ups, including The McDonaldization Thesis and Enchanting a Disenchanted World (both Sage Publications).
Culture often means an appreciation of the finer things in life; however, culture brings members of a society together. We have a sense of belonging because we share similar beliefs, values, and attitudes about what’s right and wrong. As a result, culture changes as people adapt to their surroundings. According to Bishop Donald, “let it begin with me and my children and grandchildren” (211). Among other things, culture influences what you eat; how you were raised and will raise your own children? If, when, and whom you will marry; how you make and spend money. Truth is culture is adaptive and always changing over time because
' 'McDonaldization of Society'...is the current exemplar for future developments in rationalization.' Ritzer (2005) introduced Weber's (1958) theory of rationalization in which Weber believed that the modern society is being rationalized. Ritzer (2005) then specified 5 essential components in the theory. Those are efficiency, predictability, calculability, substitution of non-human for human technology, and control over uncertainty. He noted that McDonaldization is not only influencing the operation of the fast food industry in America, but also the other aspects of society, including family, travel and leisure, and even to the rest of the world.
Ritzer, George. The McDonaldization of Society: An Investigation into the Changing Character of Contemporary Social Life, Rev.Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, 1996.
The term“McDonalization” is invented by the sociologist George Ritzer(cited in, p180), indicating the power of the spreading trend of America culture. In the book The McDonaldization of Society, Ritzer argues that fast food restaurants are becoming dominated and have profoundly affected other sectors not only in America but also in the rest of the world. Showing from the statistics, McDonald’s has expanded to over 31,000 restaurants worldwide within the last fifty years (N.E. Dollahite & J. Haun, p180). In the big cities of a country, McDonald’s is everywhere: on the main streets, in the shopping centers, around tourist attractions. McDonald’s is so popular that in China, take a simple example, it’s not surprising to see a 5-year-old child clearly knows the menu of McDonald’s and is addicted to French fries and hamburgers. Many of them even view their trips to McDonald’s as the rewards from their parents for good
McDonalds is one of the world’s leading fast food franchisee. They mainly concentrate on burgers with occasional additions with to suit the host country. They have designed meals targeted at adults to toddlers so as to reach wider range of audien...
RITZER, G (2008) The McDonaldisation of Society (5th edition) London: Sage. (Ch. 3 – Efficiency)
Is Mcdonaldization Inevitable? George Ritzer’s, Mcdonaldization of Society, is a critical analysis of the impact on social structural change on human interaction and identity. According to Ritzer, Mcdonaldization “is the process by which the principles of the fast-food restaurant are coming to dominate more and more sectors of American society as well as rest of the world” (Ritzer, 1). Ritzer focuses on four foundations of Mcdonaldization: efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control. These are the commandments of any rationalized corporation. However, they are not carried out from the point of view of the consumer. Efficiency, for example, may entail the placing of great inconveniences upon a consumer for the sake of efficient management. Calculability may involve hiding certain information from the consumer. Predictability and control may involve a company's ability to predict and control consumer behavior, not the consumer's ability to predict what kind of product or control what kind of service he gets. Ritzer calls such breakdowns "the irrationality of rationalization." Ritzer points out the irrationality of rationality, as all of the supposed benefits of Mcdonaldized systems backfire: waiting in long lines, suspect quality, little or no customer service, little or no customer service, the illusion of large quantities for low prices, and severely limited selection of choice. Throughout Mcdonaldization of Society, Ritzer describes Mcdonaldization as largely negative and often destructive. While Mcdonaldization is rapidly taking over American society and spreading to the rest of the globe, it is not something unjustly imposed on the American people. The consumerist culture of America has groomed the public to seek efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control. These principles grow in importance and value in contemporary America. Even when given the choice to avoid a Mcdonaldized establishment or product, people will flock to it. I agree with Ritzer’s analysis of a Mcdonaldized society, but I feel that Ritzer has failed to provide any real solutions to the Mcdonaldization process. I will support Ritzer’s analysis of the Mcdonaldization process, but also show that it is inevitable and essential in the American society to have a rationalized system. Ritzer stresses that “Mcdonaldization” does not just refer to robotlike assemb...
Mr. Thompson, one of the franchisees who started his own McDonalds career in the 1990s speaking of the founder of McDonald 's corporation, Ray Kroc said: “He opened up the door for so many other people to be able to have entrepreneurial careers with McDonald 's” (Lynch). The fast-food culture was not just a square peg in the square hole of that time, but also a life raft to many. The chain was an avenue for so many people to make a living. One in every eight Americans has worked in a fast food restaurant, especially McDonalds. Franchising was an opportunity for others to succeed together with McDonalds and other fast food chains. McDonalds was not the first fast food chain, but it was the first to go ubiquitously nationwide, and globally American. This was not just because it exploited a new cultural reality, but because of its deep-seated value for humanity and diversity. It didn’t cash in but created the culture
Culture has a power to overcome boundaries and even conquer distances by migrating and interfering in foreign cultures, and doing so it can lead to homogenization- where this main characteristic unifies culture making it global and model for everyone. First, as a definition, globalization implies deep and fast interconnection with global countries all around the world, and technological changes made that interconnection possible and created more support for a homogenizing
Westernization is the process in which regional or local cultures become heavily influenced by western culture and society, which in turn leads to cultural homogeneity. Many countries all over the world are affected by westernization, including India which is a land of very deep cultural roots. This raises the question of how can the process westernization affect the rich Indian culture? With India’s increasing modernization it has been difficult to ward off the effects of westernization. Westernization has the power to bring about many positive as well as negative changes in a society. In the case of India it’s culture it has been negatively affected through the adoption of western centric ideologies, which have led to a rapid loss of rich Indian culture. Some notable effects of westernization in India are its adoption of a parliamentary system, and the acceptance and incorporation of western technologies and clothing into