The Texas anti-abortion law has taken the country’s attention by storm. It is an issue on many different woman’s minds, especially those who live in the state of Texas. The new laws are forcing many woman to have to cross state lines in order to receive an abortion and medical care. This includes woman who needs abortions due to preexisting medical conditions and those who are carrying fetuses which are diseased and are expected not to be born as healthy babies. The Texas Governor Rick Perry and Senator Ted Cruz are leading the fight for the abortion laws to become permanent, laws that are considered the strictest abortion laws that this country has ever seen.
In October 2013, a Judge quickly ruled the law unconstitutional under the United States Constitution and blocked it. It was found that the new law placed a heavy burden on women who wished to end their pregnancies for whatever reason (Tomlinson). This block was later overturned and the majority of the law was reinstated. “District Judge Lee Yeakel wrote that the regulations violated the rights of abortion doctors to do what they think is best for their patients and their health, and would unreasonably restrict a woman's access to abortion clinics (Tomlinson).” New regulations requires doctors to have admitting privileges at hospitals within 30 miles distance of the approved abortion clinics. “Yeakel also partially blocked new restrictions on pregnancy-ending drugs, saying they "may not be enforced against any physician who determines, in appropriate medical judgment, to perform a medication-abortion using the off-label protocol for the preservation of the life or health of the mother (Rauf).” The goal of the Texas legislature is to completely abolish abortion within thei...
... middle of paper ...
...erences
Eckholm, Erik. "In Reversal, Court Allows Texas Laws on Abortion." 31 October 2013. www.nytimes.com. Online Article. 6 November 2013.
Hagle, Will. "Laws Forcing Women To Cross State Lines For Abortions." 11 November 2013. www.opposingviews.com. 2013. 11 November 2013.
Martin, Brittney. "Some Texas Abortion Clinics Shutdown After New Law." 24 September 2013. www.dallasnews.com. 2013. 6 November 2013.
Mildenberg, Esme E. Deprez and David. "Texas Abortion Clinics Need Million Dollar Fixes to Stay Open." 15 July 2013. www.bloomberg.com. Online Article. 6 November 2013.
Rauf, David Saleh. "Federal Judge Rules on Texas Abortion Law." 28 October 2013. www.chron.com. Online Article. 6 November 2013.
Tomlinson, Chris. "Federal Judge Declares Texas Anti-Abortion Law Unconstitutional." 28 October 2013. www.talkingpointsmemo.com. Online Article. 6 November 2013.
The laws surrounding Abortion, particularly the efforts to ban abortion and overturn Roe Vs. Wade are one of the most significant social problems we are facing in 2017. Roe v. wade is a landmark decision that was made by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion back in 1973. Abortion has been a prevalent social problem throughout history and continues to be very much a part of the social and political debate today. In fact, abortion has been one of the biggest controversies of all time. Both sides of the argument, pro-choice and pro-life, have many valid points to back their opinion and that is partly why this continues to be such a big debate. The other part is that it is very much a political issue. I stand firmly on the
Pfeifer, Michael Pearce. "Abandoning Error: Self-Correction by the Supreme Court." Abortion and the Constitution: Reversing Roe v. Wade Through the Courts. Horan, Grant, Cunningham, eds. Washington,D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1987.
Abortion is a controversial topic in today’s society as many opinions from different social groups on whether it should be legal or not create the big question: should the government be able to take away a woman’s reproductive right if it is to protect a fetus? In the United States particularly, much of the debate since the 1970s has focused on the Supreme Court case Roe v Wade, in which the court proclaimed women's’ rights to abortion but declared that the states could limit and regulate the procedure. That means that currently, the state of California allows abortions, but many groups against abortion, mostly called “pro-lifers,” still try to fight against it and want it banned. Women have a right to their own body and should
In 1973, in what has become a landmark ruling for women’s rights, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a woman’s right to an abortion. Ever since, individual states have adopted, altered, and/or mutilated the edict to fit their agendas – Texas included. However, the decision made by the justices in Roe v. Wade didn’t set clear cut, inarguable demarcation lines, which has allowed the fiery debate to consume the nation. Rather than establishing a legal ruling of what life is, or is not, the Supreme Court has remained silent on the issue.
The facts of this case show that Roe, who at the time was a single woman, decided to challenge the State of Texas’s abortions laws. The law in that state stated that it was a felony to obtain or attempt an abortion except on medical advice to save the life of the mother (Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S. Ct. 705, 1973). At the time many illegal abortions were being performed in back alleys and in very unsanitary conditions. Therefore, some states began to loosen up on abortion restrictions, in which some women found it easy to travel to another state where the abortion laws were less restrictive and they could find a doctor was willing to endorse the medical requirement for an abortion. Unfortunately, less fortunate or poor women could seldom travel outside their own state to get the treatment, which started to raise questions of fairness. Also, many of the laws were vague; therefore many doctors really didn’t know whether they were committing ...
Whether you believe in legalized abortion or not, the Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade has definitely changed the way most American women treat unwanted pregnancies. It will be interesting to see what changes may occur from the next “Roe” case.
On the side of those who not only advocate the bill but created it there is a very complicated idealism rooted in religion, state rights, and morality. As chairwoman Jane Nelson has said herself, “We [state government] have every right to exclude abortion providers and their affiliates from this program” (Aaronson, 2013). This view comes from a stand mixed with the role different parts of government play and the moral view of what abortion truly is; a simple medical procedure or an act of murder. Despite their goals to remove abortion and abortion providers from the medical providers of Texas, they do feel that they also “have a responsibility to ensure that [the women of Texas] have alternatives in their community” (Aaronson, 2013) and claim this is where the focus of their legal battles will be heading towards. For the argument of women’s health, many of those for the new bill believe that it will improve health care for women across the state, as they believe “the ideal world is one without abortion,” (Wissert, 2013) and I think most agree. Those for the bill conclude that this is the way to create a saf...
On January 22, 1973 the court issued its opinion with a 7-2 majority voting to strike down the Texas law. State laws outlawing abortion were set aside by the court, permitting abortions during the first three months of pregnancy and setting standards for regulations after that time to safeguard the women's health. The Supreme Court declared all but the least restrictive state statues unconstitutional. Noting that early abortions had become safer than childbirth and reasoning that the word "person" in the constitution "does not include the unborn." The Court
The debate of abortion continues to be a controversial problem in society and has been around for many decades. According to Jone Lewis, “In the United States, abortion laws began to appear in the 1820’s, forbidding abortion after the fourth month of pregnancy” (1). This indicates that the abortion controversy has been debated far back into American history. Beginning in the 1900’s, legalized abortion became a major controversy. In 1965, all fifty states in the United States banned abortion; however, that was only the beginning of the controversy that still rages today (Lewis 1). After abortion was officially banned in the United States, groups such as the National Abortion Rights Action League worked hard on a plan to once again legalize abortion in the United States (Lewis 1). It wasn’t until 1970 when the case of Roe (for abortion) v. Wade (against abortion) was brought...
"Jane ROE, Et Al., Appellants, v. Henry WADE." LII. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Dec. 2013.
Controversy and arguments that were setbacks in the ongoing battle for women’s rights, specifically the right to an abortion, were put to slight a rest with the landmark verdict of Roe v. Wade. The revolution in reproductive rights caused by Roe v. Wade evolved from a spark in the hearts of women everywhere. When women claimed their rights as humans, that was when the face of women’s equality in all aspects started to change. The case of Roe v. Wade was the official legalization of a woman’s constitutional right to get an abortion in the United States, but the aftermath of any case is what makes or breaks the future laws and regulations. Through all of the restrictions, regulations, and loopholes, Roe v. Wade’s verdict stuck and continued to
Rationale for banning abortions late in pregnancy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 744-747, 1998. Guttmacher Institute. State Policies on Later-Term Abortions. State Policies in Brief.
To be able to get an abortion, there are many restrictions that apply. Every state may different but similar restrictions when the law was formed in 1973. Even with the restrictions, many women were still choosing abortions. “The mandatory restrictions include: waiting periods typically from 24-48 hours before women receive the procedure; counseling stressing the disadvantages of abortions; requirements that minors notify their parents or receive their consent before obtaining an abortion; and prohibitions on providing abortions at public facilities,” (Glazer 1). Some women either could
Carr, Jessica. "Project 6 - Blog Roll." Project 6. Abortion Inhumane, 19 Apr. 2012. Web. 19 Mar. 2013.