Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The basic characteristics of Taylor's management theory
The basic characteristics of Taylor's management theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In this 21st century, management has been observed as both art and science (Reh, 2010). It is an art as it helps people to be more innovative, creative, and effective on doing their job, compare with the previous time when people would have been doing their job without applying the knowledge of management. Likewise, management can be considered as a science in how managers will be able to manage people and help them to involve further and to be more effective. The term of manager here refers to the person who responsible for planning and directing the work of a group of individuals, monitoring their work, and taking corrective action when it necessary (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg & Coulter, 2008). Taylor‘s four principles has been used in many managerial from the past decades and it is proven that Taylor’s principles has given progress in the managerial work, business, and education (Wren, 1994). However, Taylor’s principles which have been used in the past decade are being questioned if rather it is still practicable and suitable in this era or not (Carrol & Gillen, 1987, P. 38). While the purpose of this essay is to see if the Taylor’s four principles are still being applied in this 21st century and it can be successfully used even in a non-profit motivated company or organization such as government service. Interview and research have been done and it clarifies that Taylor’s principle are still being used in this particular era even though it is a non-profit organization such as government.
Mr. U has been working in Ministry of Foreign Affair Republic of Indonesia which is a non-profit organization government service. He is the head of section in Consulate General of Indonesian Republic in xxx. He is categorized as a middle-level...
... middle of paper ...
.... and Fleet, D. (2004). The ongoing legacy of R.L. Katz: An updated typology of management skills, Management Decision, 42(10), 1297-1308.
Reh, F. (2010). Management 101. Retrieved 15 August, 2010, from http://management.about.com/cs/generalmanagement/a/Management101.htm
Robbins, S., Begman, R., Stagg, I., & Coulterm M. (2008). Management, (5th ed.). Australia: Pearson Education Australia.
Rodrigues, C. (2001). Fayol’s 14 Principles then and now: A framework for managing today’s organizations effectively, Management Decesion, 39(10), 880-889.
Schachter, H. (2007). Does Frederic Taylor’s ghost still haunt the halls of government? A look at the concept of governmental efficiency in our time, The Concept of Governmental Efficiency, 67(5), 800-810.
Wren, D. (1994). The advent of scientific management, The Evolution of management thought, Wiley, New York, 105-131.
Division of work, discipline, span of control, order and equity are just a few of the 14 principles of management that Fayol constructed from his analysis. He stressed that the nu...
Kinicki, Angelo, and Brian K. Williams. Management: A Practical Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2013. Print.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter. M. (2014). Management (12th ed.). Retrieved from: Colorado Technical University eBook Collection database.
Rodrigues, C. (2001), “Fayol’s 14 Principles of Management then and now: a framework for managing today’s organisations effectively”, Monclair State University, New Jersey.
Wren. (2005). The History of Management Thought (5th ed.). Danvers, MA: Wiley & Sons. (Original work published 1976)
Wrege, C. D. and R. G. Greenwood (1991). Frederick W. Taylor, the father of scientific management: myth and reality: Irwin Professional Pub.
The evolution of management though the decades can be divided into two major sections. One of the sections is the classical approach. Under the classical approach efficiency and productivity became a critical concern of the managers at the turn of the 20th century. One of the approaches from the classical time period were systematic management which placed more emphasis on internal operations because managers were concerned with meeting the growth in demand brought on by the Industrial revolution. As a result managers became more concerned with physical things than towards the people therefore systematic management failed to lead to production efficiency. This became apparent to an engineer named Frederick Taylor who was the father of Scientific Management. Scientific Management was identified by four principles for which management should develop the best way to do a job, determine the optimum work pace, train people to do the job properly, and reward successful performance by using an incentive pay system. Scientifi...
Robbins, S.P., & Coulter, M. (2009). Management (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
There are several theories that examine an organization and it’s approach to managing work in an effort to develop efficiency and increase production. Two classical approaches to management are Taylor’s scientific management theory and Weber's bureaucratic management theory. Both men are considered pioneers of in the study of management.
Stephen P. Robbins and David A.Decenzo, Fundamentals of management: essential concepts and applications (USA: pearson prentice hall, 2003), PP.13-14.
Scientific Management theory arose from the need to increase productivity in the U.S.A. especially, where skilled labor was in short supply at the beginning of the twentieth century. The only way to expand productivity was to raise the efficiency of workers.
Robbins, S, DeCenzo, D, Coulter, M, Woods, M 2011, Management the essentials, Pearson Education, New South Wales.
the study of time and action; b) the management on assignment; c) the theory of organization. (8)Taylor’s theory created a revolution in the subject of management because it was the first scientific method in field of management science. (1)After that, management became a truly scientific knowledge and it expanded and modified by later generations. Therefore, Taylor is “known as the father of scientific management”. (2) Taylor put forward a perspective which was “study the character, the nature and the performance of each workman” and moreover, to “train and help and teach this workman”. (3) In the following paragraphs, will exploring the relevant and irrelevant hypotaxis between Scientific Management and organizations.
Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol are both considered classical contributors to management theory. Both were developing and expression their viewpoints at similar time period with the aim of “raising standard of management in industry” (Brodie,1967, p7) in a period were very few publications and theories on management. While both theories were developed with the same influencing factors such as war, social struggles and industrial revolution (Urwick. 1951, p7) each developed quite different management theories. Frederick Taylor is considered the Father of Scientific management and he developed scientific principles of management, focusing on the individual,...
Management plays a significant role in how business operates. The diversity of approaches to the theoretical and practical background of management has come up with several versions of what is meant by such key words as management and organization. The academia views expressed in relation to management theories take a different role than that prescribed to managers. There has not been any concrete definition of management even though the classic definition of Henri fayol still remains in contention to be the preferred choice after eighty years. In the context of what is required I would like to elaborate on the following journals.