Talking Therapy

519 Words2 Pages

Verbal and non-verbal components commonly used in talking therapies can enhance the therapeutic value of dialogue. The theory and practice that underpins these components will be explored and critically debated in relation to metaphors and their meaning.

Encouraging clients to become autonomous and self directed through an enhancement of responsibility for their therapy progression, is an approach that was first introduced by Carl Rogers in 1951 (Hough 2007). This Person-Centred approach permits the therapist to take a nondirective role, allowing clients to become their own person and fulfil their unique potential in therapy sessions (Nelson-Jones 2006). Based on developing client independence this approach attempts to remove therapists’ interpretation of behaviours associated with psychodynamic therapies (Burnard 2005), thus promoting growth and personal goal development.

When used in therapeutic contexts metaphors can be both a powerful and sensitive form of language designed to bring about perceptual and/or behavioural change (Hutchings 1998). However, as a verbal component of the Person-Centred approach metaphors can enhance or inhibit a client’s progress. Through use of these verbal illustrations truths can be explored and understood by clients without the ‘glare’ of realism, removing stigmatisation and allowing clients to become more acute to their own perceptions (Hutchings 1998). It is at this time, where clients feel therapists are non-judgmental, goals and responsibilities are most likely to be instigated (Mallinson et al 1996).

However, when utilising a person-centred approach in therapeutic dialogue it becomes the client’s choice as to whether their thoughts and emotions linked with metaphor are explored (Nelson-Jones 2006). This can result in clients being unable to resolve issues or events of importance within their lives; here it may be beneficial for the therapist to take on a psychodynamic approach to interpret meanings and conceptualise chosen metaphors. Kirkin (2007) explored the relationship between metaphors and truth telling, he stated that this type of word illusion could be used to obscure the truth and disguise feelings. He also suggested that interpretation of metaphors was individual and although often perceived powerful by clients, key principles were not always understood by the therapist (Kirkin 2007).

It can therefore be suggested that the use of metaphor within Person-Centred approaches to therapy allow freedom and independence in problem solving and goal setting.

Open Document