Sustainable development, when applied to the development of a system, creates complexity for the stakeholders involved in and affected by that development. To delve this complexity, solid definitions must be proposed for development and sustainable development in order for a framework to be established through which these complexities can be understood. Furthermore, these definitions are necessary evils for explorations of the intricacies of sustainable development due to the various paradigms used to define “development” and “sustainable development.” One definition of development, and the one that will be utilized within this report, is the, “utilizing resources to advance the complexity of a whole society.” From this, a definition of sustainable development can be expressed as, “a modus operandi for development which ensures that the cost to environment and to any individual human being from development is equally compensated.” This definition allows for a unification of the drive to develop with those who lose from any form of development; thus, it can be renamed “ideal development.” As is beautifully exemplified in the case of the Ecuadorian tribe the Huaorani, socio-political and economic factors allow for them to feel the benefit of sustainable development, but at the cost of the environment. Nevertheless, the problem still remains of what “modus operandi” should be adopted for dealing with development. As will become clear from an analysis of how the Huaorani tribe interacted with oil conglomerates, the utilitarian solution is the most viable solution because it ensures that the society conducting the development, and thus the large population of people encapsulated within that society, reap the benefits that created inter...
... middle of paper ...
...want to choose harvesting the oil instead of this plan because the state would be able to directly benefit economically and not be tied to private sector investments. Thus, the state’s push to harvest the oil would most likely destroy the biodiversity of the planet, thus making sustainable development, as previously defined, difficult to acquire due to economic pressures.
From this analysis, it can be concluded that selling the land allows for sustainable development from the perspective of the tribes and Ecuador as a whole, but does not allow for sustainable development in relation to the environment. Furthermore, this analysis highlights the pivotal role of money in determining sustainable development in that money, as is exemplified here, has the ability to transcend ethical dilemmas through the opportunities it opens up for those who are receiving it.
1. Definition: Sustainable development can be defined in many ways though the latest definition taken from the Bruntland report, defining sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It contains two key concepts; (1) the concept of needs, in particular the essential needs of the world’s poor, to which overriding priority should be given and (2) the idea of limitations imposed by the state
Sustainable Development Sustainable development was defined in the Bruntland Report in 1983 as “development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” (Dresner, 31) This is a satisfactory definition for most people, however, when it comes down to the policies of sustainable development, the definition given proves dangerously vague. Interpretations that stem from it can range from ‘do not touch any of the earth’s
As the idea of sustainable development has become increasingly more topical in the political arena, the question still remains as to whether our modern capitalist economies can preserve their most basic principle of maximising profits, whilst still protecting the environment. It is therefore the purpose of this essay to examine this. Can compromises be reached that enable us to protect and conserve the environment without hindering development. Since the disbandment of the Soviet Union the dominant
Linking Culture with Sustainable Development 2.1 The discourse of cultural sustainability Cultural sustainability is a fusion terms between culture and sustainable development, a phrase recently coined to depict the role of culture in promoting sustainability. The core concept itself is still a subject of ongoing debates, many leading decision makers notably those working outside the circle of cultural heritage are still unable to grasp the connection between culture and development, or simply underestimate
TOPIC: How important of Sustainable Community Development Sustainable community development is development that mantaining everythings in long time from this generation to other generations in the future. Sustainability is important for environmental, social, and economic reasons. Sustainability practices can be integrated into an existing community, but are typically easier to plan and carry out during community development. A sustainable community resembles a living system in which human, natural
Sustainable Development’s definition states that development should meet the need of the present without compromising the futures generations ability to meet their own needs, this idea of development was adopted within the 1987’s Brundtland Commission, when people became aware of the limitation of growth in the 1970’s, this report fixated on providing humans with their needs and interest while reallocating resources to other poorer countries to help them in growing economically, therefore sustainable
Sustainable development defined by Sustainable Development Measurement index (N.d.) as “sustainable development refers to social, economic, and environmental development that meets the needs of current society without compromising or limiting future development and growth” (Cantor, 2001). In short, the theoretical approach on sustainability contains three essential elements, which are social, economic and environmental development. In order to achieve sustainable development, nations are needed to
Sustainable Development in Business EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report is aimed at analyzing and studying the advancement and the operation strategies for sustainable development. Information was gathered, using business articles, on the strategies and techniques required for sustainable development. Sustainable development is not only important and essential for environmental protection and socially well-being, but also for certain economic goals a business may want to achieve. Much
influence to many countries. At this time, sustainable development of globalization comes to people’s minds. Human beings hope sustainable development would make globalization work well for all countries and all people, reduce the loss, and avoid the bad impact. From this survey, we will know the definition of sustainable development and the reasons why we should support sustainable development. What is sustainable development? In fact, sustainable development has several characteristics: balance natural
The discourse of sustainable development has deepened the consideration of rights through its attention to the rights of future generations and present especially for socially marginalized people. It also significantly puts their focus on nonhuman dimensions of the natural world by acknowledging the value and capacity. Sustainable development has proposed the issues in various aspects of society and universe as a whole and aims to create sustainable lifestyle in long term. In this paper, I will demonstrate
Introduction: Sustainable Development is becoming the new “it” word in today’s society. Companies, governments, organizations, NGO’s and individuals all around the world today boast about how they are part of the global Sustainable development movement. That is why it is necessary to understand what Sustainable Development really represents, its definitions and key concepts, real life examples and its future. For the purpose of this paper the most widely acknowledged and used theory of Sustainable Development
Sustainable development (SD) is an open concept and therefore lacks clarity. Society has different interpretations of the approaches to sustainable development, based on unique circumstances. The ladder of sustainable development places the approaches into four different categories, ranging from ecocentrism (focus on the importance of the environment) to anthropocentrism (focus on economic growth). The ladder of sustainable development was developed by Susan Baker in 1997. The purpose of the ladder
Introduction The concept of living within the ecological boundaries of the Earth means that we have to use natural resources in a sustainable way, this means that these resources should not be used to the point where their threshold is exceeded and they become depleted. Although this is the case, we also have to look at this from a social point of view. We cannot live within our ecological boundaries if the world’s population is living under the social foundation. In other words, we need to use the
Introduction Sustainable development has been defined as development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Sustainable development calls for concerted efforts towards building an inclusive, sustainable and resilient future for people and planet. The sustainable development goals (SDGs), otherwise known as the global goals, are a universal call to action to end poverty, protect the planet and ensure that all people enjoy
Sustainability development has three components: environment, society, and economy. If you consider the three to be overlapping circles of the same size, the area of overlap in the center is human well-being. As the environment, society, and economy become more aligned, the area of overlap increases, and so does human well-being. Therefore, education for sustainable development (ESD) is the use of education as a tool to achieve sustainability. Simply put, ESD is a way to make the world a safer