The law and practise of International Trade

1664 Words4 Pages

In international trade, almost all documentary credits are expressed to be subject to the UCP published by the International Chamber of Commence. The reason for that is the long periods during which the cargo is in transportation and the location of the seller and the buyer in different countries, problems arose when it comes to payment, since a simultaneous exchange of goods for money is not possible. One of the most prevalent payment tools found in international trade is the Letter of Credit (L/C), also known as Documentary Credit (DC). In Harbottle v National Westminster Bank Ltd case, Judge Kerr LJ described its importance as “the life blood of international commerce”. Furthermore, L/Cs are particularly significant in cross-border transactions, as it is served as a payment method in occasions where the seller and the overseas buyer have no or limited history of cooperation. Therefore, they do not trust each other, as they are not sure of what to expect. Although L/Cs are an essential vehicle for companies to enlarge and grow internationally, international traders often experience difficulties to achieve the high documentary compliance required by many banks. Although the UCP is of almost universal application, it does not have the force of law in the UK, and has to be incorporated into the contract, which forms the basis of the credit. In the present work, a considerable note will be based upon two main issues. Firstly, on how do the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP) 600 deal with the significance in letters of credit issued for international sale contracts with a partial reference to the autonomy principle through Article 5 and secondly, the effects of the UCP600’s attitude which results with t...

... middle of paper ...

...d. The fear comes to the fore when considering the possibility of the bank of not being able to claim reimbursement. If the buyer is insolvent the bank comprehends that, since its applicant has been bankrupt, it will never regain its losses even though it is required to honour the fraudulent documents because of the autonomy principle. Thus, the bank wants to hold in its possession only documents that recognize to be valid and accurate because only in this juncture the bank will have a greater certainty of reimbursement.

Works Cited

• McKendrick Ewan, Goode on, Commercial Law, 2010, ed.4th (Pengin Books 2010)

• Murray Carole & Holloway David & Timson-Hunt Daren, The law and practise of International Trade, 2012, ed.12th (Thomson Reuter UK Ltd 2012)

• Tood Paul, Bills of Lading and Bankers Documentary Credits, 2007, ed.4th (Informa London 2007)

Open Document