Analysis Of Discourse On Inequality By Hobbes Rousseau

1967 Words4 Pages

In the novel “A Discourse on Inequality” by Jean- Jacques Rousseau there are a number of things Rousseau talks about. I will analyze the foundations of inequality among men, and class inequality by speculating about human beings in the state of nature. Rousseau explains class inequality by speculating about human beings in the state of nature. His argument is based on a number of things from the differences between savage man and natural man. Moreover, Hobbes argues about different things with Rousseau. In the first part of the book Rousseau starts off with stating the reconstruction of natural man. Breaking it down to dealing with man’s both physical and mental characteristics. Part Two discusses the examination of inequality and the …show more content…

Rousseau mentions, what is the true object of discourse in this instance. For example, he talks about the foundations of society and how it all started with man itself. In part one Rousseau starts us off with examining natural man. If you strip a man of artificial faculties such as supernatural gifts, you can see that an animal that is less strong and agile than others. Natural man’s only tool is his body, which is stronger than ours. Rousseau says that on a one-on-one contest, savage man would easily beat civil man. Other Philosophers such as, Hobbes, Putendorf, and Cumberland say that Savage man is naturally intrepid. Which meaning savage man is fearless and adventurous than natural man. There are many differences between savage man and natural man. One of the differences between them that make up the inequality of human nature is self- preservation. Self- Preservation is the protection of oneself from harm or death which is something savage man has over natural man. It is savage man’s major care because he sleeps so much and thinks so little. Being naked and without shelter is not a disadvantage for him. We also have to take into account the metaphysical and moral side of man. Man contributes to his own operation because he is a free agent, but is otherwise similar to the animals. The key distinction of man is the faculty of perfectibility. It is the source of …show more content…

Shows how mankind arrives at a state of instituted inequality. The development Rousseau describes happens by chance he uses the factor of Revolution. Revolution in the context of this book means a great upheaval or violent change. Rousseau states that even though nature was the main source of inequality he now comes to realization that there are other environmental factors that lead to change. The change he talks both spread of mankind throughout the world, and the development of various social and economic structures. He goes more into context of how man’s interaction with his natural environment explains much of his later development. Rousseau goes back into time and talks about the First Revolution involved men beginning to use tools and build shelters. On the other-hand the development of technology led to changes in human psychology and behavior. Rousseau finally answers our question on inequality and states that conjugal love, co-operation, and particularly the creation of gender roles that make women subservient to men represent the beginning of inequality. In Rousseau beginning story he states that leisure is the driving force stage. Something that was initially a novel pleasure is now necessary. This is the beginning of man's decline: relationships with other people become motivated by forces other than pity, and become situations in

Open Document