The Stroop Effect: Revisited Through Nonarbitrary Key Press Modality

996 Words2 Pages

Fourteen undergraduate students from Middle Tennessee State University participated in exchange for extra credit points in their psychology research methods course. There were 7 females and 7 males. The participants ranged from ages 18 to 30 years (M=20.64, SD=2.98). All the participants had normal vision and were representative of the campus’ general population.
Materials
The experiment was conducted using a Macintosh G4 computer with a standard keyboard, and a 17 in. Viewsonic display screen (screen resolution 1024x768). The “MatLab” software was used to implement the experiment and record participant responses.
The stimuli for this experiment were colored squares, and color names (BLUE, YELLOW, GREEN, and RED). The squares and words would appear in the middle of the screen against a black background. The colored squares were 3in. by 3in., and the color names appeared in 88 point Helvetica font. In the White Ink Color (WIC) condition the color names were only presented in white ink; for example, the word RED would be shown but the ink color would be white. In the Color Only condition (CO) only the colored squares were presented. In the Ink Color and Color Name Congruence (ICCNC) condition the congruent ink color and color name was presented, for example: the word RED would be shown to the participant in red ink. In the Ink Color and Color Name Incongruence (ICCNI) condition were presented where the ink color and the color name were not congruent; for example, the word RED would be shown to the participant in blue ink.
Procedure
Each participant completed the conditions individually in a well lit room. The independent variable was the ‘stimulus type’ and was varied across three levels creating three unique conditions: Color ...

... middle of paper ...

...base.
Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1998). Stroop-type interference: Congruity effects in color naming with typewritten responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 978- 992. Retrieved April 4, 2014, from the PsycARTICLES database.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203. Retrieved April 4, 2014, from the PsycArticles database.
Salo, R., Henik, A., & Robertson, L. C. (2001). Interpreting Stroop interference: An analysis of differences between task versions. Neuropsychology, 15(4), 462-471. Retrieved April 24, 2014, from the PsycArticles database.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643- 662. Retrieved March 27, 2014, from the PsycARTICLES database.

More about The Stroop Effect: Revisited Through Nonarbitrary Key Press Modality

Open Document