The term six sigma (6σ) began as an operational appraisal or a measure of quality. Utilizing six sigma, procedure objectives are established in parts per million (PPM) in every part of the manufacturing procedure. From the time when its source, six sigma has now progressed into a procedure for enhancing organizational proficiency and efficiency by concentrating on productivity, price decrease, and improved quality. Six Sigma is a fixated and quantifiable management discipline that utilizes a disciplined, data-driven approach to work to remove imperfections across every business area, together with management, service delivery, design, production and customer satisfaction, stressing breakthrough improvement for improved bottom line results.
Six Sigma has its origins back with the labors of (Port, 2004). Their programs for Zero Defects and Total Quality Management in Japan, lead to the adoption of the six sigma philosophy by Motorola. Motorola was able to achieve a 200-fold improvement in production quality and saved a reported $2.2 billion using this tool. General Electric has likewise turned out to be the great advocate of six sigma where it asserts broad accomplishments. GE utilized six sigma throughout the control of Jack Welch, where he assembled it the largest organizational scheme in GE's history and obtained worldwide acknowledgement. Other users comprise Texas Instruments and Allied Signal. Allied grabbed six sigma to an even higher level by encompassing it not just in production but by constructing it a structure of management. Other current users consist of JP Morgan Chase, Sun Microsystems, American Express, and Lloyds TSB. Currently, six sigma is named as an organizational practice that uses processes as an in...
... middle of paper ...
...e of organizational philosophies and successful measurement tools.
Works Cited
Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., Williams, T. A., Camm, J. D., & Cochran, J. J. (2012). Statistics for business and economics (12th ed.). [CourseSmart version]. Retrieved from http://euo.coursesmart.com/9991285290751/?CSTenantKey=euo&spid=
DMAIC: The five phases of processing improvement. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.dmaictools.com/
Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, Ltd. (1988). Improving product quality by preventing defects. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
Port, O. (2004, August 29). Deming and Juran: The kings of quality. Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2004-08-29/deming-and-juran-the-kings-of-quality
Shaeffer, R. H., & Thompson, H. A. (1992, January/February). Successful change programs begin with results. Harvard Business Review, 70, 80-89.
Rouda, R. H., & Kusy, M. E., Jr. (1996, May 4). MANAGING CHANGE WITH LARGE-SCALE, REAL-TIME INTERVENTIONS. Tappi Journal. Retrieved from http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~rouda/T5_LSRTOD.html
There are many people that benefit from Lean Six Sigma which include mainly customers, suppliers, employees, and also stockholders. Lean Six Sigma is a way for businesses to improve, to reduce waste and to become more successful. In the future, more and more organizations will adopt or practice some of the Lean, Six Sigma, or both in order to stay competitive in today’s market. In some cases, blending both Lean and Six Sigma can be costly and difficult; however the end result can create an organization that focuses on quality, accuracy, and speed to meet the goal which is profitability.
1) Six Sigma should not be viewed as a quality program that is commissioned to reduce defects but as a methodology that helps companies better meet the needs of their business. KM shares this goal.
As you can see from the figure the lean six sigma is customer driven, targets variation, focuses
Spector, B. (2013). Implementing organizational change: theory into practice. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ
Sitnikov, C. (2012). Six sigma as a strategic tool for companies. Young Economists Journal / Revista Tinerilor Economisti, 94-102.
In his book, Leading Change, Dr. John P. Kotter communicates why organizations fail or succeed based on ten years of conducting research on more than 100 companies to see what contributed to their successful transformations and what hindered those transformations. “In October 2001 Business Week magazine reported a survey they conducted of 504 enterprises that rated Professor Kotter the number one “leading guru” in America.” The two significant aspects I took from this book were the reasons why change initiatives fail and an eight-stage process to lead the organization through a successful transformation.
Lean Six Sigma is a methodology that creates processes within an organization to cut waste and improve the company’s performance. However, studies have shown that over the past decade applying Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma can create problems for companies financially and potential problems for employees. Companies should take great care before implementing a Lean Six Sigma solution because in some instances, going lean can do more harm than good both financially for the organization as well as destroying employee loyalty and moral.
Kotter, J. P., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2008). Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review, 86(7/8), 130-139.
According to what we have learned in class, six sigma, statistically, is interpreted as having no more than 3.4 defects per million. However, they dump 10-12 dough balls per week, while 5-6 is more reasonable, which illustrates the quality mismanagement. So, the food cost there is way higher when it accounts for 38%, while industry ideal is 30%. In order to streamline the entire process of making pizza, it is an imperative for Pizza My Heart to exhaustively put six sigma in action.
The Six Sigma approach was designed by Motorola in 1986. The primary objective of the concept was to develop a tool for tallying the process defects and, as the result, improving business operations. The foundations of the approach are the customer needs, statistical analysis of data and facts, and timely execution. The method promises numerous benefits such as increasing performance and profitability of an organization, improving product or service quality and employee morale, decreasing costs, the growth of market share, the higher level of satisfying customer needs, etc. (Meredith & Shafer, 2013). The primary advantage
Kotter, JP 1995, Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. In Harvard Business Review on Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Hughes, M 2006, 'Strategic change', in M Hughes (ed.), Change management: a critical perspective, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London, pp. 52-63.
Kotter, J. P. (2007). ‘Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail’. Harvard Business Review, January: 96-103.
Padhi, N (2008). The eight elements of TQM. Retrieved February 2, 2008, from Six Sigma Web site: http://www.isixsigma.com/library/content/c021230a.asp