The Stagnation and Regression of the American Ethos

764 Words2 Pages

“Conduct and action,” wrote Roger Tawney, “…are a proof that the gift [of salvation] has been accorded.” Such was the classic 16th and 17th century Puritan mentality. Wealth and material abundance were a sign not of hard work, but of God’s grace, and mediocrity a sign of pending damnation. Success and riches were not only admired, they were idolized. Puritans equated wealth with merit, regardless of true character. Few examples of the utter stagnation of humanity are so accurate and descriptive as F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby.” The American ethos in the 1920s had not evolved in the least, as is especially clear in Fitzgerald’s tale through Nick’s interactions with Tom and Daisy, Myrtle Wilson, and even the great Jay Gatsby.

Nick Carraway’s proven susceptibility to the mesmerizing effects of money and those in possession of it make him a prime example of the tendency to liken material success to character. He does this extensively with Tom and Daisy Buchanan, who are able to disguise their flaws with tangible wealth. While sitting with in their home, Nick notices that their eyes are “impersonal in the absence of desire,” (12), and even tells Daisy that their conversations make him feel “uncivilized,” (12), meaning that those without glamorous homes and flashy clothes are vulnerable and uncivilized. However, the course of events show how vulnerable and uncivilized both Tom and Daisy are despite their riches. Everyone tolerates Tom, described as having a “cruel body,” (7) and known to injure and cheat on women, purely because he is wealthy. Daisy is similar; she too cheats on her husband and even cold-heartedly abandons the woman she just killed, yet for the entire beginning of the book, she is a charming and m...

... middle of paper ...

...acter defects, and Gatsby is able to dump his past and gain favor from the majority of both East and West Egg.

Many things should change over the course of over 300 years, yet Nick’s contact with Tom, Daisy, and Myrtle show that the 300+ years between the Puritans and the 1920s brought no advancement in the American ethos concerning the superficial and shallow treatment of those lucky enough to be born into money and exaggerate its worth. Gatsby, however, proves that it is far more serious than stagnation, the 20s show regression, making money even more powerful by giving it the ability to conceal everything else. Fitzgerald uses Nick to relay his utter disappointment in humanity and even shows Nick “waking up” from the delusion that wealth is related to worth, perhaps in hope that reality would do the same.

Works Cited

"The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald

Open Document