Among the most famous breaks in social composure in American history is the 1938 broadcast of The War of the Worlds, a radio program based on the H.G. Wells novel of the same name. Despite at least four announcements made during the program that the performance was a work of fiction, the public panicked as they listened to what they firmly believed to be a factual broadcast of an actual Martian invasion. Almost since the moment the panic occurred, historians have put forward theories incorporating this event into our social history. It is frequently cited as proof of general American anxiety about the pending Second World War. Tension was high, and, according to historian Joanna Bourke, many people listening to The War of the Worlds broadcast thought that the Germans or Japanese had been mistaken for aliens (Bourke, 2006, p.184).
However, one of the challenges with using theoretical models to connect past events in an effort to make sense out of them, i.e. history, is that we can only look at them from our current shared reality, not from the shared reality of the people who experienced the events. Ludwick Fleck wrote,
Truth… is always, or almost always, completely determined within a thought style. One can never say that the same thought is true for A and false for B. If A and B belong to the same thought collective, the thought will be either true or false for both. But if they belong to different thought collectives, it will just not be the same thought! It must either be unclear to, or be understood differently by, one of them. (Erickson, 2005, p. 69)
What all of this means, is that our history serves us and only us. History is not absolutely and finally true; it can and often does lose meaning over time. A generation f...
... middle of paper ...
...t nebulous combination of events and theories is the stock and the historical cannon is the output. This historical cannon can cycle back around and be combined with new theories to make new history, or it can be forgotten. The peer review Carr describes serves as a feedback loop, keeping combinations of theories and events in line with, to use Fleck’s term, contemporary thought collectives. History, like any well functioning system, perpetuates itself. It changes over time, but history, the story we tell ourselves about who we are and how we got here, is as old as humanity itself.
Works Cited
Bourke, J. (2006). Fear: A Cultural History. United States of America: Shoemaker &
Hoard.
Carr, E. H. (1961) What is History?. New York: Vintage Books.
Erickson, M. (2005) Science, Culture and Society: Understanding Science in the 21st
Century. Malden, MA: Polity.
What is history? Many believe that history is what is read in textbooks, or what is seen on the news. If Susan Griffin were asked that question, she would probably argue that history is much more than that. It is about the minds and souls of the people who went through the historical event, not simply what happened. In her essay, Griffin incorporates stories of people from totally different backgrounds, and upbringings, including herself, all to describe their account of one time period. Each person’s history is somehow connected with the next person’s, and each story contr...
What more is the point of learning and understanding human history than obtaining the knowledge and structure between what is right and what is wrong? We continuously believe that we as humans have the ability and intellect to learn from the lessons taught in our past in order to enrich our future. In comparison to the time frame that is human history the one hundred year period of time we discussed in the second halve of this semester is nothing but a slight blimp on the map that we have traversed. Yet, throughout our recent readings we can easily assimilate into the idea that although time may pass, and that we may attempt to learn from our history it is simply in human nature to repeat the mistakes that we have
In his short article “World History as a Way of Thinking” Eric Lane Martin, “…argue[s] that the most important things the field of world history has to offer the researcher, teacher, student, and general public are the conceptual tools required for understanding complex global processes and problems.” Anyone who follows the evening news or shops at Wal-mart, has encountered the processes and problems Martin speaks of. Our modern society puts pressure on a variety of citizens to grapple with and attempt to understand issues on a scale that moves beyond the local and national. History has long been a tool utilized by scholars, politicians and citizens to help them put current day happenings into context. That context has allowed for a deeper understanding of the present day. In an era when the issues cross national and regional boundaries the need for a different scale of history has become apparent. World history has emerged as a relatively new discipline within academia that is attempting to provide the context for large-scale processes and problems. As the field has grown a variety of authors, some historians, some from other fields, have attempted to write a history of the world. With such a daunting task how can we define success? How can we analyze the history that provides a true global perspective on processes and problems we face? By taking Martin’s two key characteristics of world history, one, it is defined by the kinds of questions it asks and two, it is defined by the problem-solving techniques it uses, we can analyze texts purporting to be world history and access their utility in providing context for the global processes and problems we face today.
The study of past events have been a common practice of mankind since the verbal telling of stories by our ancestors. William Cronon, in his article “Why the Past Matters,” asserts that the remembrance of the past “keeps us in place.” Our individual memories and experiences shape how we act in our daily lives. In addition to influencing us at an individual level, our collective history binds us together as a society. Without knowing where we have been or what we have experienced, it is nearly impossible to judge progress or know which courses of action to pursue. The goal of the historian is to analyze and explain past events, of which they rarely have firsthand memory of, and apply the gained knowledge to make connections with current and future events.
...nce historians only have a limited view of all the incidents created by forces and people. Despite this, new interpretations are constantly being formed from new evidence, and this will likely continue for many more years to come.
Robert Morgan claims that history is not just made up of a few heros and villians.“It is natural and perhaps necessary for historians and story-tellers to view the dramatic shifts of history through
demonstrate the complexity of history and the extent to which a variety of factors, including bias
...xpect nor want historians to agree in their interpretations of the past, for then new discoveries would never be made and our knowledge would be limited. It is through this synthesis of knowledge and constant dialogue between historians that the most comprehensive representation of the Progressive Era, and ultimately history in general, is created.
“It [history] is like a river. From any vantage point, a river looks much the same day after day. But actually it is constantly flowing and changing…one day, when the banks are thoroughly weakened and the rains long and heavy, the river floods and bursts its banks, and may take a new course.” (Kay 1948)
History is more than a collection of facts from pastimes, or a one-sided story containing the “right” answer. History contains a narrative; however, this narrative combines historical narratives from different perspectives, in order to create an inclusive history. Unfortunately, this narrative is sometimes hidden by overpowering perspectives, and consequently, prevents other perspectives from being recognized. American history is argued as one of these overpowering perspectives, as it has portrayed history from a white American view point. This argument is not uncommon, nor is it exclusive to the United States. Most of the developed world has and overpowering perspective of history. However, it is important to use the building blocks found in less developed nations to reconstruct history, in order to represent a more inclusive narrative. Dr. Paul Ortiz’s,
...to learn the hidden facts of my past. Before I read this book, history did not make a lot of sense to me. I have always loved history, but it has been a subject that I have struggled with. With Loewen’s explanations, it has been easier to comprehend specific events in our history. This book has provided me with the incredible impact of the truth. I yearn for the reader of my paper to experience similar effects that I have received. I want my reader to have a new appreciation for our past. I desire for my reader to comprehend history. I highly recommend this book to high school students and history teachers. I will never find the correct words to explain the impact this book has had on my personal feelings. Lies My Teacher Told Me provides the knowledge needed to understand how we are where we are today. This book is so much more rewarding than taking a nap in class.
War of the Worlds is an out of the box radio play that changed the world of mass communication forever and allowed the entire nation to see power of imagination and the unique power of radio over its audience. The creators of this nationwide hysteria were Orson Welles and the Mercury group. Orson Welles was a famous American actor, producer, director and radio broadcaster. In an effort to increase the shows audience, Orson Wells catered the idea of a Halloween public scare. The War of the Worlds radio play was a dramatization of H.G. Well’s novel The War of the worlds (1898 novel relating the story of an alien invasion on Earth) and performed as a scary Halloween episode on of the radio show Mercury Theater On The Air. The episode was aired over the Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS) on October 30th, 1938. The first two thirds of the 62-minute broadcast were presented as a series of simulated news bulletins, which suggested to many listeners that an actual alien invasion by Martians was currently in progress. Orson Welles’s scripted act was so convincing that the broadcast caused hysteria throughout the nation as several listeners believed that the nation was actually being invaded by Martians in a seemingly unstoppable attack. Many people were terrified by the news, and they left their homes in panic and fled. The aftermath of the broadcast was so disastrous that even Welles and his team were shocked. This 1938, 62 minute broadcast truly changed the meaning of mass media and everybody came to realize the true potential and power of mass communication.
It’s truly fascinating how there are so many different approaches to history, how so many different types of minds and schools of thought can come together to study the events of the world’s past. There are so many ways to approach what happened in our past, and the groups of historians previously mentioned are only a fraction of the actual number of different ways of researching and thinking that exists as it pertains to the study of history. History is in some ways, always a mystery, and all historians, regardless of schooling, training or biases, seek to accomplish one goal: to understand what occurred before us and why, and to use that knowledge to learn how the world was shaped into the world we live in today.
Knowledge is gained through a myriad of personal experiences through a variety of ways that shapes a person’s understanding. The knowledge we obtain is the culmination of our experiences as we learn what our brain interprets from our senses. Knowledge is the transmission of information that shapes a person’s understanding on a particular topic using a way of knowing. The language used by others to formulate our own ideas and thoughts produce knowledge. The knowledge obtained can either be objective and subjective. The two areas of knowledge, history and arts, are both typically at fault for being inaccurate or bias. The role of history is to study, interpret and analyse the events of the past and relay these findings through language. Language communicates thoughts and ideas through a verbal or written broadcast, thus allowing knowledge to be conveyed. The arts are a broad area of knowledge that communicate knowledge through the manipulation of our sense perceptions that allow us to experience sensations through any of our five senses. The inaccuracies and biases of these areas of knowledge and ways of knowing is due to the pre-set beliefs and values that affect how an artist or a historian chooses to express a particular message to others. Each historian belongs to a school of historiography that holds the belief that an event was due to a specific set of factors and the language used supports this claim. Similarly, artists utilize our sense perceptions to convey a message through a painting. Arts are a broad area of knowledge to i...
History is a story told over time. It is a way of recreating the past so it can be studied in the present and re-interpreted for future generations. Since humans are the sole beneficiaries of history, it is important for us to know what the purpose of history is and how historians include their own perspective concerning historical events. The purpose and perspective of history is vital in order for individuals to realise how it would be almost impossible for us to live out our lives effectively if we had no knowledge of the past. Also, in order to gain a sound knowledge of the past, we have to understand the political, social and cultural aspects of the times we are studying.