Social Stratification According to Marx and Weber

1156 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Marxist social stratification

Social stratification is the hierarchical arrangement of individuals into divisions of power and wealth within a society. Social stratification relates to the socio-economic concept of class, consisting of the upper class, middle class, and lower class. Each class may be further subdivided into smaller classes through the main indicator is occupation. This is the most practical and most effective means of encompassing the wide variety of economic and social elements that go to make up a person’s class through their education, status, income and power. Evidence shows that wealth is distributed unequally and that incomes vary from small to huge. The old idea of Britain’s class structure was comprised as a triangular shape; with increasing amount of people at the bottom towards the base as a majority of people were unskilled manual workers which provided a strong industrial based manufacturing sector. This model implied a hierarchy showing people who had high levels of income, status and power at the top. However, there has been a dramatic shift in Britain’s industrial structure as people have now gone onto tertiary or service sector jobs. Therefore, I am going to discuss why Britain’s class structure has become fragmented evaluating the statement ‘Social class is a thing of the past. It no longer exists’ from all four theories Marxism, Max Weber, functionalism and postmodernism.

The functionalist view of social stratification is being inevitable and also to perform a positive function for society. Their argument for this is that an unequal distribution of rewards and privileges found in the class system allows for its most talented members to be attracted from society and put in the most important roles (Davis and Moore). Howe...

... middle of paper ...

...What Should Be Done About Growing Inequality?. [online] Available at: http://business.time.com/2012/11/01/what-should-be-done-about-growing-inequality/ [Accessed: 2 Apr 2014].
Sparknotes.com. 2014. SparkNotes: Social Stratification and Inequality: Theories of Stratification. [online] Available at: http://www.sparknotes.com/sociology/social-stratification-and-inequality/section4.rhtml [Accessed: 2 Apr 2014].
The Independent. 2013. Labour says the working class no longer exists, so why do 60 per cent of us claim to belong to it?. [online] Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/labour-says-the-working-class-no-longer-exists-so-why-do-60-per-cent-of-us-claim-to-belong-to-it-8452739.html [Accessed: 2 Apr 2014].
Writework.com. 2007. The Death of Class? - WriteWork. [online] Available at: http://www.writework.com/essay/death-class [Accessed: 2 Apr 2014].

Show More
Related

  • Social Stratification in 'Manifesto of the Communist Party' by Karl Marx and Max Weber's 'Class, Status and Party'

    478 Words  | 1 Pages

    Social Stratification in 'Manifesto of the Communist Party' by Karl Marx and Max Weber's 'Class, Status and Party'

    Read More

  • Wealth Inequality in the US with Sociological Viewpoints

    1100 Words  | 3 Pages

    Functionalism argues that inequality is important and necessary because it “motivates people to fill different position in society that are needed for the survival of the whole of society.” [8] The rewards, i.e. wealth, prestige, and power and the resulting wealth gap ar...

    Read More

  • Cross-Class Unity During the Blitz: A Non-Existent Component of the Myth of the Blitz

    1675 Words  | 4 Pages

    Before World War II, Britain was strictly divided into classes: the upper class, the middle class, and the lower working class. Once born into a class, it was almost impossible to leave; people were bound to classes for life. The structure was stern and rigid. George Orwell even called England (and by extension Britain) “the most class-ridden country under the sun.” Classes tolerated each other, but the “upper and middle class people were brought up to believe the lower classes dirty and inferior,” creating an environment of stark inequality (The Class System). The small upper class held the majority of the wealth and employed much of the large lower class as servants, paying them menial wages. The middle class, who consisted of doctors, shopkeepers, lawyers, and people in similar professions, remained sandwiched in the center. On September 7, 1940 the blitz began and bombs started to rain down on London. However, the force of the bombs did little to blast away the walls that separated and distinguished the classes.

    Read More

  • Class and Poverty in Australia

    1827 Words  | 4 Pages

    Tahlin, M. (1993), `Class Inequality and Post-industrial Employment' in GostaEsping, A. ed., Changing Class: Stratification and Mobility in Post-industrial Societies, London, SAGE.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Social Classes in America vs. 1984

    1164 Words  | 3 Pages

    If you have ever read the book 1984 by George Orwell, then an interesting topic may have crossed your mind. The way the classes of people break down can be quite similar, and very different at times. In the United States, we have classes like the lower class, the working class, and the middle class. In 1984, there were such classes as the Proles, the Outer Party, and the Inner Party. The way the classes are broken down in 1984 reminds me a little bit of my old history class. When I studied medieval times and the classes back then were broken down into the nobles, the bourgeois, and the serfs.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Tingle's The Vexation Of Class

    796 Words  | 2 Pages

    The working class stays working and the middle class stays being middle. Author Nick Tingle, wrote “The vexation of class”, he argues that the working class and the middle class are separated educationally based on culture and the commonplace. Tingle uses his own personal experiences and Ethos, to effectively prove his point about the difference in class based on culture ; although, Tingle also falls short by adding unnecessary information throughout the article that weakens his belief entirely.

    Read More

  • Class in Australia Today

    1062 Words  | 3 Pages

    Connell & Irving (1992) identify ‘class structure’ in Australia with the ‘ruling class’ owning property/business, and the ‘working class’ in the way of labourers whom ‘act together in resistance to the capitalists’. This is relevant today in Australia with the privileged having majority of the power and wealth. Moreover, exploitation of the ‘working class’ continue to maintain less power within the workplace & less wealth. Connell & Irving offer an uncomplicated view of class structure, (1992: p 40):

    Read More

  • Class Inequality By Davis And Moore

    1011 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore article “Some principles of stratification” informs us how important inequality is. People need to be in different social positions to balance out and make the society function. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels article, “The class struggle,” on the other side, begins with the two social classes; along with how unfair and corrupted the system is benefiting, and damaging the rest of the people. By inheritance and effort, people will always be in different social statuses, but changes will only happen when people unite to make the difference.

    Read More

  • Social Inequality in the United States

    692 Words  | 2 Pages

    Functionalist argue that stratification is "necessary and beneficial" to a society to ensure the highest qualified individuals will fill the best societal positions. Inequality in the distribution of desirables exist as a device for ensuring that the most important positions are filled by the most qualified people. Certain jobs are more important than others, and those jobs require special skill and talent. The cycle of unequal opportunity is intensifying, and the United States beneficiaries often slander those who are the most systemati...

    Read More

  • Understanding Immigration: Stratification and Prejudice in USA

    840 Words  | 2 Pages

    First, the chapters cover stratification. According to study.com “Social stratification refers to a system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. In the United States, it is perfectly clear that some groups have greater status, power, and wealth than other groups.” According to the textbook “Stratification is unequal distribution of valued

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Wright And Marxism

    310 Words  | 1 Pages

    The ever evolving meaning of class in todays’ society is loaded with many adverse senses and invites moral disapproval, also known as ‘exploitation’, where profit is extracted from resources which ultimately reinforces the ongoing inequality among the minority of Australians. This is evident in both Marx and Wrights theories as they are equally carried out in diverse ways. Analytical Marxism approaches the issue of class by focusing on the scientific explanation, whereas, Wrights theory of class values pragmatic research and is open to having his ideas and concepts modified , unlike Marx. In the Marxist theory, he reflects how our physical and emotional life can be affected by our feelings towards work and expenses . He similarly states that

    Read More

  • What is wrong about Donald Black's theory of law?

    1247 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Black?s definition, stratification is ?the vertical aspect of social life?, ?any uneven distribution of the material conditions of existence? (Black 11), in other words the discrimination of wealth. Stratification can be measured in quantity, delineated in style and viewed from two perspectives, as a ?magnitude of difference in wealth? (Black 11) and as the level to which the setting is stratified. Moreover, stratification explains not only law, its quantity and style, but also other aspects of social life. The relationship Black is mostly interested in is the positive correlation between stratification and law, meaning the more law, the more stratified the setting is. When utilizing this proposition by inserting other variables of social ...

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Karl Marx And Max Weber

    1333 Words  | 3 Pages

    Karl Marx and Max Weber are two of the most significant and influential theorists and sociologists of the 19th century. Both examined very similar ideas but had very different conclusions and are now famously known as ‘The Founding Fathers of Sociology’. One of the Crucial contributions to sociology is both sociologists views and findings on class and equality. Karl Marx found that class was categorised by the means of production. Almost half a century later Max Weber contrasted, class was based on three things Power, Wealth, And Prestige.

    Read More

  • E.P Thompson's The making of the English Working Class

    1113 Words  | 3 Pages

    However his book also received much criticism, as Kaye and McClelland point that his ‘own theory of how class formation is determined remains highly ambiguous.’ This suggests that perhaps Thompson did not go into specific detail on how class was formed and when, which remains a highly debated topic. The fact that Thompson argues ‘thus the working- class presence was, in 1832, the most significant factor in British political life’, is argued by the Marxist historian Anderson, that class was not specifically made in the 1830’s due to its decline, but was perhaps made in the 1880’s. The fact that he insinuates that the English working class was not ‘made’ by the ...

    Read More

  • How Poverty Affects Academic Performance

    2579 Words  | 6 Pages

    Kerbo, H. R. (2012). Social stratification and inequality: class conflict in historical, comparative, and global perspective (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Read More

More about Social Stratification According to Marx and Weber

Open Document