The use of horses for human consumption dates back to the earliest use of animals for human consumption. Horses are used for food in many counties but are also considered inhumane in other countries. In the United States specifically, horsemeat is not the norm for consumed meat. There seems to be a problem that has arisen. It is suspected that horses being slaughtered at horse slaughtering factories are not the most up to date, pain free for the horse, and human as people suspect them to be like beef kill floors. There are many pros and cons to horse slaughter that accompany the pressure groups on each side of horse slaughter. Another big controversy with horse slaughter is the argument of legalizing horse slaughter and what those details will entail in the law. There are numerous pros for horse slaughter and to legalize these factories. One reason being wild horses cause damage to property and eat crops and forages saved by the people for domestic animals. According to the On Fate of Wild Horses, Stars and Indians Spar article by The New …show more content…
According to an article by NBCNEWS, “LONDON -- When officials in Ireland made a routine check on a few hamburgers, what they found made them nervous: One burger was actually nearly one-third horse (Fraud). Also stated in this article, horsemeat has been found circulating in the following countries: U.K., France, Germany, Sweden and Norway. This is causing a lot of trust issues with people because people aren’t quite sure if the meat they are eating is truly beef as advertised or if horse and pig accompany it. Wikipedia announced, “Willy Setten, a Dutch meat wholesaler, was arrested for selling 300 tonnes pounds of horsemeat as beef” (France-Presse). This conviction proves a big point and should give some answers on how horsemeat is mistakenly sold and advertised as
Breeders are against slaughter but they maybe the ones causing the problem. Race horse breeders breed multiply foals a year but not all race will and those rejects either find a home or go to slaughter but even champion race horses aren't safe as said in the article Thoroughbreds Washed Up in Racing Often Land at Slaughterhouse “Five Star General will be sold on this day and shoved into a pen with two dozen other horses. Then he'll be loaded into a trailer and shipped 1,500 miles to a small plant just outside Fort Worth, Texas. He will be slaughtered there, racing dreams packaged and shipped overseas. His processed remains will be exported to Belgium or France, where the meat will be prepared in a kitchen. This is horse racing's dirty little secret--the one those in the industry traditionally have ignored and outsiders barely hear about” (Mease). Breeders over breed and end up with to many foals. Not all foals are granted a home the left over to to slaughter and so do old race horses their to much money to keep
Furthermore the increase in in documented crime from those communities has been shown to be as high as 130% and a 63% increase with the amount of criminals being booked by the police, and a town in Canada also experiences a 70% in crease in crimes reported. While the slaughter plants were in those towns they were not helping stimulate the economy because the plant was foreign owned and didn’t have to pay tarries to export the meat to their countries. It is estimated that during the time horse slaughter was going on in the United States about five million dollars of federal money was spent just on three slaughter plants. When going through taxes records of a now closed horse slaughter plant it was found that the plant only had to pay five dollars in tax while they had made a gross income of 12,000,000. While the economic impact is important to know about that doesn’t mean that the
In a review the website writes that “Slaughterhouse is the first book in which workers in the meat industry speak publicly about what is actually taking place in America’s slaughterhouses.” This particular book shined light to the graphic and very disturbing facts that factory farms are providing all types of products at the expense of the lives of innocent animals. The book is able to bring forth evidence and enticing information that is hard to miss by the reader because at one point or another, this matter was meant to come to light. The review goes further in illustrating “Eisnitz 's investigation with a single complaint from a United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) worker alleging that cattle there are having their heads skinned while fully conscious. This single complaint becomes a full-scale, groundbreaking investigation.” Slowly but steadily, Eisnitz was able to figure the puzzle out and attract the attention of individuals and organizations who are particularly found of advocating for animal rights. The book itself had testimonies from workers who would deliberately beat, “strangle, boil, or dismember animals alive. Today’s slaughter line does not stop for anything: Not for injured workers, not for contaminated meat, and least of all, not for sick or disabled animals.” This is the driving force of individuals who have no other
Temple Grandin once said, “I think using animals for food is an ethical thing to do, but we 've got to do it right. We 've got to give those animals a decent life and we 've got to give them a painless death. We owe the animal respect” (Quotes). This quote is one of the countless quotes by Temple Grandin; after her many years of work in slaughter houses and with animals. Everything that happens to animals by humans must be done in a humane and safe way. Farmers are working every single day to make sure all animal slaughtering is done in the most humane matter. In the United States slaughtering practices have strict regulations and many experts like Temple Grandin are advocating for the animals.
Cone, Tracie. "USDA, McDonald's suspend slaughterhouse buys." USA TODAY. USA TODAY, 22 Aug 2012. Web. 23 Feb 2014.
This was passed through a rider inserted by Senator Burns. The bill forces the Bureau of Land Management “to sell "without limitation" every captured horse that is 10 or older or has proved unadoptable” (Murr, 51). Howard Crystal, a lawyer for the Humane Society adds that " [the bill] consigns thousands of horses to death," prompting horse advocates for a more humane solution to the overcrowding of horses in current government management. Also, to manage the excess horses, the BLM also has debated whether to induce euthanasia on the horses. However, due to backlash to animal activist communities, the BLM are inconclusive on using lethal
The choice of eating meat or not has been a debated issue for a continued number of years. There have long since been two sides: the proponents and opponents of meat consumption. More and more debates of its value and effect on the world have risen. Many claim it is wrong, while others think of it as a needed pleasure.
Horses that get slaughtered are often someone’s pet. It often doesn’t matter whether the horses are young or old. They are slaughtered for their meat, their mane, or their hooves to make glue. Its understandable that some of these items are needed in everyday life, but there slaughterhouses are very inhumane! These horses have talent. “Some have been in races, some have been in shows, some have been pets, some are young and others are old. Almost all horses qualify for the slaughterhouse(“Keep American Horses Safe From Slaughter”). This is animal cruelty! This cruelty needs to stop! Do you currently have a horse? Have you ever owned a horse? Do you want a horse? If you’ve answered any of these questions with a yes then you already know that one of those well trained horses that are being slaughtered could be yours, or your daughter’s or son’s new horse. These horses deserved to be loved and cared for, definitely not put to ...
...h and safety laws have been disregarded in the slaughterhouses, causing a number of deaths. Also, there is a great deal of corruption in the slaughterhouses where workers are being threatened or lied to, especially about their injuries. I couldn’t imagine a factory not providing any type of reimbursement if anybody got hurt on the job.
Kanter, James. “E.U. animal-welfare plan may limit trade; A new law could protect test animals but could block more meat imports.” International Herald Tribune. 27. April 2010: 1. eLibrary. Web. 05 May 2010.
Cruelty toward animals, huge economic problems, and major health concerns are just three reasons why factory farming should be banned worldwide. Many people argue that factory farming is the only way to meet growing demands for food in the world today. However, factory farming is just not necessary, especially when it comes down to killing innocent animals in order to feed people. A way to put an end to the factory farming system is by buying our food from smaller, sustainable farms. These businesses still aim to profit from their labor, but that’s not their only objective. (The Issues: Factory Farming, n.d.) They simply will not sacrifice the health of the land or the quality of food simply to make a few extra dollars.
Bibliography: The Week UK. (2014). Horsemeat scandal hits Tesco profits. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.theweek.co.uk/business/53417/horsemeat-scandal-hits-tesco-profits [Accessed: 1 Apr 2014].
Meat has been a staple food in the diet of mankind since the early ages of civilization. In the article “Is Any Meat Good to Eat?” by Sarah Boesveld, she interviews author Jonathan Safran to share his opinion on eating meat and factory farming. He believes that “...if [people] just ate according to the values they already have, then factory farming would disappear.” Whether or not people realize the sources from which meat in modern day society comes from, they cannot deny the fact that meat is delectable. Sadly, many people who are aware of where their meat comes from will argue that it is unethical to eat meat that is grown purely to satisfy the hunger of people. The ethics of eating meat should not be considered because of the extreme importance of meat in our diet.
Is it morally permissible to eat meat? Much argument has arisen in the current society on whether it is morally permissible to eat meat. Many virtuous fruitarians and the other meat eating societies have been arguing about the ethics of eating meat (which results from killing animals). The important part of the dispute is based on the animal welfare, nutrition value from meat, convenience, and affordability of meat-based foods compared to vegetable-based foods and other factors like environmental moral code, culture, and religion. All these points are important in justifying whether humans are morally right when choosing to eat meat. This paper will argue that it is morally impermissible to eat meat by focusing on the treatment of animals, the environmental argument, animal rights, pain, morals, religion, and the law.
It is despicable as a human being to believe that animals have no rights. Today, eagerness to meet the high demand for meat, dairy, and eggs in a record amount of time is the cause of deplorable conditions and animal cruelty. Whistleblowers have helped in making public the inhumane treatment of these animals. Proving that there is a need to direct attention to the animal welfare. On the contrary, the animal agriculture industry is making an effort to protect themselves from whistleblowers. They have passed Ag-Gag-Laws to suppress whistleblowers and investigators from making public the deplorable conditions and routine cruelty that animals endure. They pretend like animal cruelty does not exist. The reality is that it makes no sense for the industry to deny abusive conditions. Then pass a law that punishes those who expose animal cruelty. Their intention is to keep their atrocious practices secret from the public. Animal welfare is not a priority for the industry and with such laws animals will continue to be victims of harm. In this paper, I will discuss how the moral theories of