The Passion Of The Christ Film Analysis

1094 Words3 Pages

Portrayals of Biblical figures is nothing new, but this seemingly new trend of cinematically filling in Biblical gaps of history - as it were - most certainly is. In particular, Noah, Exodus: Gods and Kings, and Risen have each taken it upon itself to add flair to well documented scripture - as a means to reenact some of the most famous moments in the Bible.

Specifically - and possibly even the most famous Biblical film of the modern era, The Passion of the Christ, realistically depicts the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. No, it’s not the only film to bring the event to life on either the big or small screen, yet it arguably did it the best. And, just a few short weeks ago - Risen picked up where The Passion left off, showing the days in the aftermath of Christ’s death.

Now, we have a film that attempts to depict - albeit in semi-fictitious fashion, the childhood of a young Jesus Christ…

In …show more content…

It’s visually powerful, and depicts the single greatest sacrifice in human history. Still, and to a degree, it only makes sense for filmmakers to attempt to add the same illumination on the other defining moments in the life of Jesus Christ.

The problem is - not every moment is as specifically defined as the crucifixion - leaving the window wide open for plenty of exaggeration.

Thus, novelist Anne Rice attempted to stylistically fill the gaps of Jesus’ younger years, more specifically - his adolescence, using potential conflicts that he may well have actually faced (in her 2005 book, Christ the Lord: Out of Egypt). But, how accurate or inaccurate is The Young Messiah? Well, that’s a question for Bible experts to decide, and - like most things - Google will be happy to lead you to where you need to be if your major hang-up with a film like this is the potential for historical inaccuracies.

Back to the story,

Open Document