Shelly versus Shelley: Critiques of the Romantic Ego

1463 Words3 Pages

Both Percy and Mary Shelley had written a different interpretation of the Prometheus myth; with Percy’s Prometheus Unbound and Mary’s Frankenstein. Both of these works had examples that showed how the characters projected themselves into other beings. It could be interpreted that Mary had the intention to criticize the way a strong feeling of wishing something that is beyond the laws of the natural world to happen is without regard for the consequences that could occur as a result. These outcomes cannot be planned or controlled. Despite the outward appearance or aspect of the emphases on knowledge and creation—traits that are often considered virtues—Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Percy Shelley’s Prometheus Unbound revealed the ways in which humans, in their desire for these virtues, can triumph over the unpredictability of nature. The visually descriptive and figurative language that each author utilized helped to show the advantage of the power of narrative as a means of expressing the characters’ egos which drove them to overreach for the dominance over nature and relate to real people.
In Frankenstein, Frankenstein was preoccupied with the idea of creating life from nothing. On page 50, he expressed his wonderment, “I succeeded in discovering the cause of generation and life; nay, more, I became myself capable of bestowing animation upon lifeless matter.” He had succeeded in understanding the reasons for which life functions but he placed more importance on the discovery that he could cause it on his own. The events that take place in the novel follow as the consequences of Frankenstein’s longing for validation of his own self-worth. That desire filled his mind to a point where it haunted him. Mary Shelley consistently sho...

... middle of paper ...

...ppearances and the sublime because even though they weren’t the main focus, they were important to the stories. The main characters’ egos were the driving forces of their actions and influenced what happened to the other characters.

Works Cited

Romantic Critique http://legacy.owensboro.kctcs.edu/crunyon/CE/Frankenstein/Name/Prometheus/RomanCrit.htm When worlds elide: classics, politics, and culture
By: Bassi, Karen.
Lexington Books
2010

Romantic dharma: the emergence of Buddhism into nineteenth-century Europe
By: Lussier, Mark.
Palgrave Macmillan
2011

The "One" in Prometheus Unbound
John Rieder
Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900
Vol. 25, No. 4, Nineteenth Century (autumn, 1985), pp. 775-800
Published by: Rice University

Romantic Critique (Romantic Critique)
http://legacy.owensboro.kctcs.edu/crunyon/CE/Frankenstein/Name/Prometheus/RomanCrit.htm

Open Document