The seventh chapter of Romans remains one of the more controversial sections of Paul’s final letter. This paper will attempt to provide a unique interpretation and of vv14-25 . This section is rhetorically and stylistically challenging, and there is no consensus as to audience, or meaning. It might be seen as offering up a very low anthropology, and a pessimistic view of the human condition. Even the central question of who is thought to be speaking in the majority of the chapter remains a hotly contested question. Nevertheless, in the face of perceived ambiguity, the speaker of Romans Chapter 7 offers an insight into the deep schism of action and thought that is found in each human mind, which can only be escaped through the grace and power of God.
To understand Paul’s thinking in this passage, it is of primary importance that we understand to whom his statements may apply. Based on style and rhetoric, is widely agreed that in verses 7-25, Paul is not speaking as himself . Some argue that Paul is speaking with the voice of an unrepentant gentile, while others think that he is speaking as a gentile Christian. Theories include Paul speaking with the voice of Adam, of himself before coming to Christ, or as a not yet mature Christian. The statement from verse 14, “sold into slavery under sin,” would certainly apply to this person. I will make the claim, however, that the identity of the speaker in these verses doesn’t preclude their applicability to all of humanity. For the sake of argument, let’s move forward with the belief that Paul is referencing the life of a gentile, apart from the law and apart from Christ. This is a person who is in many ways the extreme opposite of a Jew who is obedient to the law. Nonetheless, the statemen...
... middle of paper ...
... thought as discovered by the speaker in Romans 7 is indicative of a larger and detrimental trend in humanity. Jesus proclaimed, “no city or house divided against itself will stand.” Paul would make the same claim of any person working towards righteousness without the grace and power of God. We end with a the hope of an escape, or perhaps to engage a different metaphor, Paul has given us a bridge. In Rom 7:25-8:1, we are offered the work of Jesus Christ as a response to the schism which had thus far been debilitating, and the promise that there is no longer any condemnation for those who embrace the power of God through Christ Jesus.
Works Cited
Cragg, Gerald R. The Epistle to the Romans. Vol. 9, in The Interpreter's Bible. Nashville: Abingdon, 1954.
Stowers, Stanley. A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews, and Gentiles. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.
Roman emperor Julian the Apostate and Christian leader Antony both exhibited many qualities of character during their existence. Both of them led very distinctive lives although shared several ethical values. Book 25 of “The Later Roman Empire” and the book “Early Christian Lives” show concrete evidence of this. In the following essay, I will argue how both leaders’ lives were devoted to their religious beliefs and their mutual cardinal virtues.
Dio, Cassius. "Roman History published in Vol. II of the Loeb Classical Library edition, 1914 ." 10 2006. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/13*.html (accessed 3 1, 2010).
Antony Kamm ~ The Romans: An Introduction Second Edition, Published in 2008, pages 47, 93
In continuance of Romans chapter 5 verse 20, the next sentence of this verse reads as follows: “But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound”, notice, the beginning portion of the sentence as stated just before the comma is implemented, it says, “But where sin abounded. What this means is, that where sin was exceedingly plentiful and beyond measure in the sense of it having dominion, it no longer abound having dominion over the lives of those who were born and shaped in iniquity, but instead are made free from this curse through Jesus Christ. Because of the grace of God, we were justified by faith unto redemption in salvation, praise God, sin is no longer present.
Martin, Malachi. The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church. New York: Putnam, 1981. Print.
The basic structure of Romans is fairly simple. It is called letter-essay style by some, though there is no proof that it was read to any group of people. It is the gospel of God’s righteousness. Sections of Romans are even dedicated to showing the basiscs of christianity like the “Romans road”. This basic knowledge allows ... ...
...o confront the social acceptance of the institution of slavery, or even threaten the order of society. What this does suggest is that Paul wanted to convey the theological principle of unity to the Church by imploring them to perceive all believers as equals in spite of social classifications. When the wide variety of job descriptions, economical standings, education, and geographical placement of Christians today is considered, it is advantageous to heed to Paul’s example of appreciating individual believers as fellow workers in Christ.
Paul then continues on to talk about the way in which the Philippians need to compose themselves and tells them to “stand firm in the one Spirit, striving together as one for the faith of the gospel” (1:27). He says this because at the time the Philippians had a lot of forces that opposed them, just as Christ did when he was here on earth. Rather then becoming boastful or prideful Paul urges the Philippians to be like a servant who gives all the glory to God and not upon
There is perhaps no greater joy in life than finding one’s soul mate. Once found, there is possibly no greater torment than being forced to live without them. This is the conflict that Paul faces from the moment he falls in love with Agnes. His devotion to the church and ultimately God are thrown into the cross hairs with the only possible outcome being one of agonizing humiliation. Grazia Deledda’s The Mother presents the classic dilemma of having to choose between what is morally right and being true to one’s own heart. Paul’s inability to choose one over the other consumes his life and everyone in it.
Virgil. Vergilius Vaticanus. Vollstandige Faksimile-Ausgage im Originalformat von Codex Vaticanus Lat. 3225. Graz: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, 1980. Print.
Heichelheim, Fritz, Cedric A. Yeo, and Allen M. Ward. A History Of The Roman People. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1984.
4)Rosenstein, Nathan Stewart., and Robert Morstein-Marx. A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2006. Print.
Paul’s religion collided with the thought of Jesus being the Son of God, and him being raised from the dead on the third day after his crusification, so this is why Paul thought the persecution of the church was needed. Another reason Paul could not accept Christianity was because it was not clear how Jesus could be the Son of God, and yet have to be crucified on the cross. He thought if Jesus was crucified, then he had a curse placed upon him, and if Jesus was cursed, then how can he be the one true Son of God? Then Paul pondered how could Jesus be raised from the dead if God placed a curse upon him. All of these questions led Paul to persecute the Christian faith and church.
Johnson, S. Lewis. “Studies in the Epistle to the Colossians.” Bibliotheca Sacra 118 (1961): 147.
Swindoll, Charles R. Swindoll’s New Testament Insights: Insights on Romans. Grand Rapides, MI: Zondervan, 2010.