Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
aspect of self-directed learning
aspects of self directed learning
aspect of self-directed learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: aspect of self-directed learning
Self-directed learning has been a central part of the Ohio’s Science & Engineering Talent Expansion Program (OSTEP) and the Pre-Freshman and Cooperative Education (PREFACE) Program. Through various activities and assignment, students are challenged to become actively involved in their own learning. For example, an independent research project allowed the students to design their own experiments and report their findings. In this way, the students did not learn their knowledge from books or from professors. Rather, they gathered knowledge on their own, which might help improving retention. Reading through the literature on this type of learning, it becomes clear that many people believe that self-directed learning is a better approach than the traditional, teacher-directed learning. However, this approach is not necessarily a good fit for everybody. Self-directed learning is better for students who are willing to take initiative and are interested in the subject, while traditional learning is better for people who are not interested in learning a subject.
In the traditional approach to teaching, the teachers are sole source of knowledge. They decide what the learners need to know and communicate that knowledge from books and from their own experience. In addition, they tell the learner how to learn the materials, and decide on a way to test the learners’ understanding of the subject. The responsibility of the learner is to absorb all of these materials and then demonstrate their understanding in the manner indicated by the teachers. The learners are motivated externally, for example, by grades and other rewards. In addition, the approach assumes that the learners have less experience or that their experiences are less important th...
... middle of paper ...
...s teacher-directed. What and how the learners study depends mostly on the teachers. The approach works well for novices and people who are not interested in the subject. The approach of self-directed learning, on the contrary, revolves around the learners. It is best for people who are interested and are willing to take charge of their education. Rather than deciding which approach is better in general, the teachers and the students should decide which approach is the most beneficial in their particular situation.
Works Cited
Merriam, Sharan B. "Andragogy and Self-Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory." New
Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 2001.89: 3-14. Wiley Online Library. Web. 24 July
2011. .
"Self-directed Learning by Malcolm Knowles." 1975. PDF file.
...simply reuses the same approach and methodology each year, his class is likely to become boring and ineffective. In order to properly educate students, a teacher must always be looking for ways to improve his course—methods of making the knowledge seem more interesting and relevant to students. Originality and innovation not only maintain students’ attention, but also help keep teachers interested. Any subject matter will seem boring if an instructor teaches it the same way for twenty years. In order to maximize the effectiveness of their teaching, educators constantly must be in search of new methods of presenting content. Complacency, after all, is the first step on the road to ineffective instruction. Teachers, like their students, must always remain motivated by the desire to improve. Without this desire, the process of education becomes stagnant and empty.
General categories of self-regulated learning based on the results obtained from several studies on self-regulated learning. These three categories are:
Autonomy is defined as the ability to make your own decisions without being influenced by anyone else. (Longman Dictionary, contemporary English)
...tion from the 1970s to the 1990s, its concept is as old as the hills. Self-directed learning refers to "a process in which an individual takes the initiative, with or without the help of others," to determine one’s learning needs, create learning goals, find resources for learning, implement strategies, and evaluate outcomes (Knowles, 1975). An estimated 70 percent of adult learning is self-directed learning (Cross 1981).
Brockett, R., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning. London and New York: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www-distance.syr.edu/sdlindex.html
‘Practical experience … shows that direct teaching is fruitless. A teacher who tries to do this usually accomplishes nothing but empty verbalism, a parrot like repetition of words by the child, simulating knowledge of the corresponding concepts but actually covering up a vacuum.’ (Vygotsky. 1962:83)
Self-directed learning is not a new concept. In fact, much has been written about it. Unfortunately, however, it is a notion that has a variety of interpretations and applications in the corporate training arena. Typical, narrow interpretations involve simply giving learners some sort of choice in their learning. For example, allowing learners to select one or more courses from a curriculum, or, in cases of structured on-the-job training, allowing employees to choose what pre-designed modules (e.g., a video tape, workbook, special reading, etc.) to complete. In terms of e-learning, the fact that learners can determine which modules or scenarios to review is also frequently touted as self-directed learning. The fact that the learner has a choice and makes a decision to select this or that module does not constitute true self-directed learning.
In recent years, educators, fieldwork supervisors, and managers have focused on self-directed learning rather than traditional learning where an “expert” tells an individual what to do, reads off lecture slides, and controls every aspect of the classroom. Self-directed learning is knowledge that is gained when the individual takes initiative. They identify what needs to be done, formulates goals to accomplish a given task, identify resources that may foster their learning experience, chooses and implements appropriate learning strategies, ask themselves was their goals meet, and reflects on the overall experience to gain a better understanding on what worked and what didn’t. By transforming the way individuals learn, experts hope future workers
This perspective represents a change in the thinking about the teaching-learning process; a change between an approach that favours what works to the majority of the students and that incorporates something “different” or additional ‘for those
The teacher talks, while the students exclusively listen. During activities, students work alone, and collaboration is discouraged. When education is teacher-centered, the classroom remains orderly. Students are quiet, and the teacher retains full control of the classroom and its activities. Here, the students learn on their own, they learn to be independent and make their own decisions and the teacher directs all classroom activities, they don’t have to worry that students will miss an important topic. When students work alone, they don’t learn to collaborate with other students, and communication skills may suffer. Teacher-centered curriculum and its instruction can get boring for students due to the fact that it doesn’t allow students to express themselves, ask questions and direct their own learning. This is a one-to-many system and only the teacher decides the objective of learning of the subject, the pedagogy, the evaluation methods, and the result of the study. This method is used in many autonomous autocratic higher education
Laberge (2003) says that teaching is the process of imparting skills, knowledge, attitudes and values. It can also be considered as a cyclical process of instilling, transmitting or constructing knowledge. It basically involves several kinds of skills, classroom management, selecting and adapting suitable materials, evaluating and assessing students. It is somehow interrelated with developing good learning process. Encarta (2009) defines learning as the acquisition of knowledge or skills. It is involves in acquiring new competences. In order to achieve good teaching and learning developmental process, both teachers and students play vital role throughout the lesson. One of the major concerns in ensuring successful classroom is the suitable approach or appropriate methodologies used in class by teachers. As we all know, learners have their own learning style. In order to assess learners well, a good and suitable teaching approach is important so that the learning objectives are achievable.
The nature of teacher and learner interactions of this approach stems from the foundation that every person teaches one another and that everything in life teaches. The formal teacher of the educational event is the facilitator of knowledge and conversation, yet is not the only authority on the topic. Everyone carries knowledge and can learn from one another through sharing authority. As Halverson states, “teachers dealing with youth and adults need to be clarifiers of the faith, lifting up dilemmas, encouraging thought, and being open to many viewpoints” (31). Rather than having a hierarchical and set method of teaching, this approach to conveying a message opens conversation and allows people to feel validated and supported. The learner is more important than the content.
The main objective of teaching at any level of education is to bring the fundamental change in the learner (Tebasal&Kahssay 2011). To facilitate the transmission of knowledge to learners. The teachers should apply the appropriate teaching method that will be suitable and specific at the level of secondary schools. Many teaching practitioners employ learner centred method until today, questions about effectiveness of teaching methods on student learning have consistent raised considerable interest.
In this course I experienced an important change in my beliefs about teaching; I came to understand that there are many different theories and methods that can be tailored to suit the teacher and the needs of the student. The readings, especially those from Lyons, G., Ford, M., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2011), Groundwater-Smith, S., Ewing, R., & Le Cornu, R. (2007), and Whitton, D., Barker, K., Nosworthy, M., Sinclair, C., Nanlohy, P. (2010), have helped me to understand this in particular. In composing my essay about teaching methods and other themes, my learning was solidified, my knowledge deepened by my research and my writing skills honed.
Individuals are assumed to learn better when they discover things by themselves and when they control the pace of learning (Leidner & Jarvenpaa, 1995). Therefore, it is natural to expect that self-directed, interactive learning would improve learning outcome.