Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The history of racism in us
Secession us history esssay
The history of racism in us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The history of racism in us
I want to secede. Specifically, I want to secede from all of civilization, and more specifically, from the industrialized world. I want to create upon an unutilized portion of earth to create a safe place to live and grow. I want the freedom to create personal standards of living, to engage in a collective process, to create and use a physical space that is autonomous, and to create a new self-sustaining trade system. I want a community free from violence, laws, sanctions, oppression, imaginary and political borders, and the global market. It would be preferable to achieve this without threat of violence or use of violence, without exchange of money, and without written documents.
Attempting to secede from the US, or any other part of the world, and even from the world as a political whole, would be a great undertaking that would likely be marred with extreme violence. The U.S Constitution, with the Supreme Court's interpretation in 18, does not allow for states, or private citizens to secede from the country. The right and necessity to secede and separate needs to be recognized and acted upon. To do this, ignoring the imminent gunfire, would take an army of legal scholars. Two prominent memories in US history are the secession of the South and the wanted secession of Texas. Neither of these have come to fruition, though there are hundreds of nationalist/separatist/secessionist groups continuing to fight (www.huffingtonpost.com).
There are roughly 195 countries on Earth currently. Each one of these is recognized in a geographical-political way. Only 192 are recognized by the United Nations and just 2 more than that are recognized by the US. Many of the 195 are actually under control of other countries (Rosenburg, 2011). Sin...
... middle of paper ...
...09/colorblindness-new-racism
Rosenburg, M. (2011, March 2). The number of countries in the world. Retrieved from http://geography.about.com/cs/countries/a/numbercountries.htm
Gilbert, J. (2008). Against teh commodification of everything. Cultural Studies, 22(5), Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a901749948~tab=content ~order=page doi: 10.1080/09502380802245811
Moore, J. (n.d.). A primitivist primer. Retrieved from http://www.eco-action.org/dt/primer.html
McQuinn, J. (n.d.). Against organizationalism: anarchism as both theory and critique of organization. Retrieved from http://theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Jason_McQuinn__Against_Organizationalism __Anarchism_as_both_Theory_and_Critique_of_Organization.html
Matt, . (2002, November 07). Anarchism and collective organization. Retrieved from http://www.nefac.net/node/17
Sectionalism and the Breakup of the U.S. Throughout the early 1800's the country was split in many areas over many issues. Some of the more severe clashes between differing groups resulting from such issues as slavery, expansion, and internal improvement. With all of these controversial topics to worry about along with the vast diversity in the nation, causing separation and tensions throughout the country. The most prominent of the previous topics was slavery.
Leading up to Civil War many events transpired that created a disconnect between Americans within the United States. The South believed that slave labor boosted the profitability and sustainability of their economy by allowing for cheap labor that lasted for a long time, while the slaves could also reproduce, creating more cheap labor to come. The North, however, disagreed with the South; they did not want slaves to take American jobs and they also promoted American labor. The North and South each tried to sway the other’s position on the topic of slave labor, but neither would budge. As time passed, certain events lead to the decline of slavery. The south recognized this and threatened to secede from the Union, adding to the disconnect between the two. Secession is defined as: to break away from; but for the South it was leverage to either help them attain what they desired or they could leave the union. Admitting free states, disallowing slavery to expand, and President Lincoln’s election were significant factors that lead to the secession of the southern states in 1860 and 1861.
Some states are currently threatening to leave the country because of the belief that the government has too much power over the people and the laws our country has to follow. In our society, we live by laws set by the government, and if any of them are broken, there is a punishment. These laws are set to make sure that the people of America are following the way things are ran so the country will not collapse. Although these laws are set for the safety of the people, sometimes when the government has that kind of power to make people follow certain things they should not have to follow, many issues arise. In the late 1800’s, many issues emerged between the South and the Union on whether the Southern states had the right to secede from the United States. The Southern states did have the right to secede because of political, economical, and social reasons. These reasons include numerous examples of the Union treating the South unfairly and violating the terms of the U.S constitution.
How Separatist Groups Have Had Little Success at Gaining Autonomy from the Country Which they are Currently a Part Of
Tensions between the North and South had grown steadily since the anti slavery movement in 1830. Several compromises between the North and South regarding slavery had been passed such as the Nebraska-Kansas and the Missouri act; but this did little to relieve the strain. The election of President Lincoln in 1861 proved to be the boiling point for the South, and secession followed. This eventually sparked the civil war; which was viewed differently by the North and the South. The Northern goal was to keep the Union intact while the Southern goal was to separate from the Union. Southern leaders gave convincing arguments to justify secession. Exploring documents from South Carolina’s secession ordinance and a speech from the Georgia assembly speech will explain how the Southern leaders justify the secession from the United States.
What is called "the right of secession" has no existence. It means the right of revolution, which belongs to every people....If the revolution succeeds, history justifies them; if they fail, it condemns them, even while not condemning their motives of action....If South Carolina should rebel,--and secession is rebellion,--and if other states should join her, it would be the duty of the general government to compel them to observe the law....” ("Secession and the Civil War").
I think in all fairness the secession was a big mistake for the South. The southern states economy was based on an agricultural system which relied on slave labor. They felt that the election of Lincoln threatened the power structure in the South. In the beginning Lincoln did not believe in abolition, his thought was that the individual states should regulate slavery. In the North industrial progress dominated the region and in time would make its way to the South which would threaten slavery. If the South seceded there would be conflict, where the fugitive slave act can be put to the test. The Kansas-Nebraska Act made the Northern states angry because slavery would migrate to the western territories. The South believed that
The final step in the preparation for a new government was separation from the old government. This was declared twice in the Declaration of Independence. In the beginning, “That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, driving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” and in the end, “that these united colonies are, and ought to be, free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved. In conclusion, the Declaration of Independence was able to motivate people, give them ambition, and make it simple for Americans to take action.
During the ratification of the Constitution, anti-Federalists proposed a compromise in which the state of New York reserved the “right to withdraw herself from the Union after a certain number of years” if the federal government did not support reforms the state favored. The Federalists immediately rejected the compromise claiming that the Constitution did not permit unilateral state secession. Alexander Hamilton and John Jay made it abundantly clear that the “reservation of a right to withdraw” was ultimately “inconsistent with the Constitution, and was no ratification.”
...ed in the USSR. The republics that were part of the USSR demanded their independence. On August 19, 1991 a group of hard core communists tried to overthrow Gorbachev. At the time he and his wife were on vacation in the Crimea and the KGB put them under house arrest. Meanwhile in Moscow the leaders of the rebellion sent in tanks onto the streets. The president of Russia, Yeltsin demanded that
To all the great people of South Carolina, it is our time to take action. Our own country is ready to take our honorable state down and we will not comply. As the political leaders of our great state, we need your approval to secede from the United States to form a sovereign and just nation for our state. The inauguration of Abraham Lincoln will begin the demise of the Southern lifestyle, such as abolishing slavery. This will additionally have a negative impact on our state because the blacks will become free and steal our jobs. Additionally, the North will become much more powerful than our state and we will not have much power in Congress. The country we helped form has turned their back on us, we have to act. The actions of the North are dangerous to our lifestyle, and our great state will have to be bold and become a prosperous nation that will not oppress its citizens.
...y rule for independence. So to answer the question if seceding would be legal, the answer is unclear. It is not possible to know before there is a majority vote to secede that would result in the House of Commons determining it.
Other than death and paying taxes, few things in life are truly inevitable. Each event occurs in response to another and is connected into a chain that leads to a certain conclusion. In 1776, the southern United States did not feel the need to remove themselves from the Union to which they had willingly joined. But in 1861, it seemed inevitable that the southern lifestyle would not be able to exist in a society intent on destroying it. What provided the catalyst for such a stark turn of events? Slavery—a cornerstone of southern society—existed peacefully inside the Union since the nation’s Declaration in 1776. Thus it was not slavery that fueled the secessionist flames in the Deep South, but contravention on political, economic, and social levels. Secession occurred as a backlash to extensive northern infringement on southern ideals: a backlash that would ultimately lead to the destruction of the entire institution of slavery.
First of all, the land area will shrink. If California secedes from the US and becomes its own country, California will become a small country. However, land area is too small will bring a lot of problems. For example, population overload, housing, transportation, and employment become difficult. The second one is suffering political pressure from other countries. When California has just become an independent country, it will lose the protection from the United States. A newly established country, without its own national army, but with rich materials, perfect modern facilities, such circumstances are vulnerable to other countries to attack and
Frieden, Jeffry A., David A. Lake, and Kenneth A. Schultz. World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2013. Print.