Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
how does shakespeare use sanity in hamlet
madness vs sanity in hamlet
summary of the sanity of hamlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: how does shakespeare use sanity in hamlet
Sanity in William Shakespeare's Hamlet
Hamlet is a play about a man who has had a father killed by his uncle,
after this act of treachery the uncle then marries Hamlet’s mother.
Hamlet is sane in this play because prior to going “insane” he informs
us he is going to. If Hamlet were truly insane he would not be able
to tell others that he is going to act insane as of a certain point in
time. Hamlet would try to deny insanity, not pride himself in the
fact that he is insane. Hamlet uses insanity as a way to express
himself, almost as if he thought people would think it was normal for
him to these things because he was insane. Hamlet is sane in the play
because he can think and act normally, he acts normal towards key
characters in the play, he is totally aware of what is going on around
him, he acted nothing like Ophelia, and he is able to still get what
he wants in the end.
Hamlet thinks and acts thoroughly in the play, if he were insane he
would not be able to think situations through. Hamlet thinks clearly
in thought when acting out thoughts in the play, certain factors that
would benefit him. An insane person would not think things through,
they would just act on emotions. Hamlet contemplates over killing his
uncle in a confessional, if Hamlet were insane he would not be able to
think so logically over the fact that in “forgiveness of his sins
Claudius would go to heaven” (3. 3. 74). Hamlet was still sociably
accepted, people still loved him, and usually one is taken away from
society when declared insane. Because he could act thoroughly he
could still somewhat win over an audience, he would act crazy towards
the ge...
... middle of paper ...
... do not understand ourselves (Lewis).
Hamlet understood himself so he achieved his goal and was not insane
by killing the king, he did it all for justice and even for the people
for Claudius killing off a better king, King Hamlet, he did it for the
people that could not understand themselves and in turn not able to
take down a corrupt monarchy.
Through thinking and acting normally, being sane towards certain
characters, knowing how to react in unusual situations, being
different from Ophelia, and achieving what he wanted in the end Hamlet
is truly a sane person. It was all to avenge the death of Hamlet’s
father, he may have staved off the final outcome, but only because he
thought things through when others out of being insane from these
traumatic events would not be sane enough to be capable of doing the
same.
that they had seen a ghost during the night watch. Hamlet was shocked at the
“I plead guilty by reason of insanity,” is Hamlet’s plea if he was sitting in a modern courtroom. In Hamlet by William Shakespeare, it is evident that Hamlet himself is indeed out of his mind. The reader understands the reason for his anger and frustration, but how he “fixes” the situation is beyond a sane mind. To be fair, his madness deals more with emotional instability referred to as melancholy or madness than a person who is incoherent. Hamlet’s madness becomes clear in his actions and thoughts, in his erratic relationship with Ophelia, and in the murder of Polonius.
be insane. There are many clues to suggest Hamlet is insane but infact he is
Is Hamlet sane or insane that is the question. There are many sections in the play which show portray him as being insane but there are such as the when he hears of his fathers death. On the other hand Shakespeare illustrates Hamlet as a sane person when ever he is with a non guilty party. Hamlet is clearly sane though because he acknowledges that he is putting on an act whenever he is acting crazy.
Throughout William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet undergoes a transformation from sane to insane while fighting madness to avenge his father’s death. The material that Shakespeare appropriated in writing Hamlet is the story of a Danish prince whose uncle murders the prince’s father, marries his mother, and claims the throne. The prince pretends to be feeble-minded to throw his uncle off guard, then manages to kill his uncle in revenge. Shakespeare changed the emphasis of this story entirely, making his Hamlet a philosophically minded prince who delays taking action because his knowledge of his uncle’s crime is so uncertain.
Hamlet: Hamlet's Sanity & nbsp; & nbsp; “Great wits are sure to madness near allied, and thin partitions do. their bounds divide.” Though John Dryden's quote was not made in regard to William Shakespeare's Hamlet, it relates very well to the argument of whether or not Hamlet went insane. When a character such as Hamlet is under scrutiny, it can sometimes be difficult to determine what state he is in at. particular moments in the play.
In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the title character is insane. He kills a person, sends two more to their doom, plans another’s death, and is both suddenly active and haltingly inactive at various points in Shakespeare’s play. Yes, in certain circumstances all of these may be enacted by a person of sane character, but any examination of the play will show that Hamlet is not a sane character.
...on the matter, that Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet is most certainly of sound mind. He appears insane merely as an act to throw his would-be enemies off his trail and suffers the same pangs of despair any sane person would in his situation. Branagh has clearly put significant effort into the part, and his portrayal is evident of nothing less.
...th him in case he is biased. A madman would not have had the foresight, reason, or possibly even care, to think in this very organized fashion. Even when questioning whether ?to be or not to be (3.1.64)? Hamlet is sane in his thinking. He measures the ?pros and cons? of his situation, and although at this point he appears mad to most everyone, he is most definitely sane in thought.
Shakespeare's tragic hero, Hamlet, and his sanity can arguably be discussed. Many portions of the play supports his loss of control in his actions, while other parts uphold his ability of dramatic art. The issue can be discussed both ways and altogether provide significant support to either theory. There are indications from Hamlet throughout the play of his mind's well being.
Hamlet, knowing that he will get into difficulty, needs to feign madness for the purpose of carrying out his mission. He rehearses his pretended madnesss first with Ophelia, for even if he should fail there in his act of simulation, that failure will not cause him any real harm. The manifestations of insanity that Hamlet will show become predictable - a sure sign that it is a simulated and not a real insanity.
Hamlet is a play written by William Shakespeare in 1601. The play follows a young prince named Hamlet. Who returns home from school and discovers that his father has died, his uncle has married his mother, and ends up meeting the ghost of his father. The play has been a success since its release, having been performed in a run since its first production. Hamlet’s main enemy in this play is shown as the Uncle, who Hamlet learns from his father’s ghost early on killed his father. Hamlet’s worst enemy according to some scholars, is himself. Hamlet seems to do nothing but get stuck in his head for almost the entire play until he’s finally faced with his own mortality and therefore must act or defy his father’s wishes. When Hamlet
Hamlet throughout the play seems insane but in reality it is only an act to achieve his goal of killing his father's murderer. Hamlet chooses to go mad so he has an advantage over his opponent and since he is the Prince of Denmark certain behavior is unacceptable, so by faking madness he is able to get away with inappropriate sayings and actions. We can see this when he talks to Claudius, Polonius, Ophelia and his mother. When Hamlet talks to Horatio in the first act he says how he is going to "feign madness" and that:
Intelligence is often mistaken for brilliance, and conversely genius is mistaken for madness. Some of the greatest minds have been misconstrued in there time, and it is not until their whole life is taken into observance from the outside looking in, that their genius is realized and appreciated. Websters dictionary defines madness as "the act of being foolish or illogical." Ironically this form of thought has prompted some of the greatest advancements in government, science, and technology. It was the thought that every common man and woman should be included in his or her respective governments that prompted Democracy, a form of government unheard of before the signing of the Magna Carta. It was scientists and inventors thinking outside of the lines that inspired the cure for Small Pox and the invention of the computer. It can clearly be seen that serious thought is often the by-product of irrational thinking, this is also true for literature. It is while in madness, both feigned as well as sincere, that the characters in William Shakespeare's Hamlet are able to practice true mental clarity and express themselves in a manner free of treachery and falsehood.
Madness is a condition that is difficult to distinguish between true and false. As in the encounter of the ghost of Hamlet 's father with Hamlet, Hamlet is asked to avenge his father 's death. To accomplish this task in a less apparent manner, Hamlet decides to feign madness. In the long run, Hamlet truly does go insane. Consequently, his behavior thereafter is frequently unfathomable. William Shakespeare, the writer of the tragic play, Hamlet, leaves Hamlet 's sanity up to interpretation. Throughout Shakespeare 's Hamlet, Hamlet 's questionable madness is explored through his real madness, feigned actions, and the reactions of others towards his madness.